Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 25;23:512. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04538-8

Table 2.

Prediction of RNA editing sites in P. granatum mitogenome

Type RNA-editing Number Percentage
hydrophilic-hydrophilic CAC (H) = > TAC (Y) 6
CAT (H) = > TAT (Y) 16
CGC (R) = > TGC (C) 6
CGT (R) = > TGT (C) 29
total 57 12.23%
hydrophilic-hydrophobic ACA (T) = > ATA (I) 5
ACC (T) = > ATC (I) 1
ACG (T) = > ATG (M) 5
ACT (T) = > ATT (I) 4
CGG (R) = > TGG (W) 32
TCA (S) = > TTA (L) 71
TCC (S) = > TTC (F) 30
TCG (S) = > TTG (L) 38
TCT (S) = > TTT (F) 38
total 224 48.07%
hydrophilic-stop CAA (Q) = > TAA (X) 3
CGA (R) = > TGA (X) 2
total 5 1.07%
hydrophobic-hydrophilic CCA (P) = > TCA (S) 6
CCC (P) = > TCC (S) 8
CCG (P) = > TCG (S) 3
CCT (P) = > TCT (S) 17
total 34 7.30%
hydrophobic-hydrophobic CCA (P) = > CTA (L) 36
CCC (P) = > CTC (L) 12
CCC (P) = > TTC (F) 8
CCG (P) = > CTG (L) 29
CCT (P) = > CTT (L) 23
CCT (P) = > TTT (F) 10
CTC (L) = > TTC (F) 8
CTT (L) = > TTT (F) 12
GCA (A) = > GTA (V) 1
GCG (A) = > GTG (V) 5
GCT (A) = > GTT (V) 2
total 146 31.33%
All 466 100%
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure