Table 10.

Simulation results of BBPSO, DLSBBPSO, ETBBPSO, PBBPSO, TBBPSO and PBSO, $f_{28}$ to $f_{29}$.

Function	Data type	BBPSO	DLSBBPSO	ETBBPSO	PBBPSO	TBBPSO	PBSO
28	Mean	5.000E+02	5.000E+02	5.000E+02	5.000E+02	5.000E+02	5.000E+02
	STD	5.926E−04	4.503E−04	4.921E−04	3.790E−04	3.394E−04	6.068E−04
	Best	6.060E−02	2.048E+00	6.230E+02	2.932E+01	2.250E+02	1.552E−01
	Worst	5.915E+04	5.297E+04	1.256E+05	5.966E+04	1.359E+05	9.351E+04
	Rank	2	5	3	6	4	1
29	Mean	4.552E+03	4.388E+03	4.217E+03	4.330E+03	4.500E+03	4.005E+03
	STD	9.481E+02	6.939E+02	7.639E+02	7.328E+02	8.772E+02	7.758E+02
	Best	6.060E−02	2.048E+00	6.230E+02	2.932E+01	2.250E+02	1.552E−01
	Worst	5.915E+04	5.297E+04	1.256E+05	5.966E+04	1.359E+05	9.351E+04
	Rank	6	4	2	3	5	1
Average Rank		3.45	3.69	3.82	4.55	3.97	1.52
Population Size: 100
Max Iteration times: 10000
Dimension: 100
Search Range: [−100 100]
Independent Runs: 37