Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 25;6:198. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00944-2

Table 2.

Diagnostic performance of the transformer-based model on a pixel level after 250 training epochs and additional finetuning.

Diagnostic category Total pixel number (N × 106) F1 IoU Average precision Accuracy
Diagnostic performance after 250 training epochs (baseline training)
Caries
Non-cavitation 6.096 0.595 0.423 0.683 0.983
Grayish translucency 0.260 0.347 0.210 0.420 0.999
Enamel breakdown 0.139 0.161 0.088 0.468 0.999
Dentin cavity 2.713 0.763 0.617 0.751 0.995
Fully destructed tooth 0.922 0.630 0.460 0.542 0.997
Molar–incisor hypomineralization (chalky teeth)
Demarcated opacity 3.715 0.586 0.423 0.657 0.990
Enamel disintegration 0.688 0.604 0.433 0.674 0.998
Atypical restoration 1.552 0.669 0.503 0.704 0.996
None 246.057 0.984 0.969 0.980 0.970
Total 262.142 0.962 0.937 0.961 0.964
Diagnostic performance after 250 training epochs + finetuning
Caries
Non-cavitation 6.386 0.773 0.630 0.813 0.990
Grayish translucency 0.292 0.746 0.595 0.743 0.999
Enamel breakdown 0.136 0.521 0.352 0.588 0.999
Dentin cavity 2.471 0.818 0.692 0.830 0.997
Fully destructed tooth 1.674 0.881 0.787 0.882 0.999
Molar–incisor hypomineralization (chalky teeth)
Demarcated opacity 4.758 0.804 0.672 0.827 0.993
Enamel disintegration 0.322 0.673 0.507 0.669 0.999
Atypical restoration 1.566 0.906 0.829 0.902 0.999
None 244.539 0.990 0.979 0.988 0.981
Total 262.144 0.977 0.959 0.977 0.978