Table 3.
Outcome | Independent variables found to be statistically significant and included in the final model | Unstandardized Beta (95% CI) | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Moral distress (n = 242) |
RFP was congruent with PICU values | −0.32 (−0.54 to −0.09) | 0.01 |
Families coped well with RFP | −0.40 (−0.59 to −0.20) | < 0.001 | |
RFP made the job easier | −0.19 (−0.37 to −0.01) | 0.04 | |
RFP increased workload | 0.57 (0.02 to 1.12) | 0.04 | |
RFP added stress to families | 0.24 (0.05 to 0.43) | 0.01 | |
Felt hospital/PICU valued clinician health with RFP policies | −0.19 (−0.35 to −0.02) | 0.03 | |
Perceived that some families were differentially impacted | 0.88 (0.38 to 1.38) | 0.001 | |
Impact of event scale (n = 230) |
Felt exemption process consistent | −0.88 (−1.72 to −0.04) | 0.04 |
PICU subspecialty trainee or clinical associate | −10.32 (−16.55 to −4.10) | < 0.001 | |
Attending physician | −5.99 (−10.32 to −1.68) | 0.01 | |
Families coped well | −1.00 (−1.92 to −0.09) | 0.03 | |
Stress (n = 251) |
RFP made the job easier | −0.18 (−0.25 to −0.11) | < 0.001 |
RFP increased workload | 0.54 (0.32 to 0.77) | < 0.001 | |
RFP was congruent with PICU values | −0.08 (−0.17 to 0.01) | 0.09 | |
Families coped well with RFP | −0.09 (−0.17 to −0.01) | 0.02 | |
RFP added stress to families | 0.091 (0.02 to 0.17) | 0.02 | |
Felt hospital/PICU valued clinician health with RFP policies | −0.076 (−0.14 to −0.007) | 0.03 |
CI = confidence interval; PICU = pediatric intensive care unit; RFP = restricted family presence