Table 1.

Summary of Sekhon, Cartwright and Francis [18] theoretical framework of acceptability

Construct	Definition	Constructs adapted to community pharmacist-delivered PND screening
Affective attitude	“How an individual feels about taking part in an intervention” [18]	How pharmacists feel about community pharmacists taking part in PND screening
Burden	“The perceived amount of effort that is required to participate in the intervention” [18]	The perceived amount of effort that is required to participate in community pharmacist-delivered PND screening
Ethicality	“The extent to which the intervention has good fit with an individual’s value system” [18]	The extent to which community pharmacist-delivered PND screening has a good fit with the pharmacists’ value system
Intervention coherence	“The extent to which the participant understands the intervention and how it works” [18]	The extent to which pharmacists understand PND screening and how it works
Opportunity cost	“The extent to which benefits, profits, or values must be given up to engage in an intervention” [18]	The extent to which benefits, profits, or values must be given up to engage in community pharmacist-delivered PND screening
Perceived effectiveness	“The extent to which the intervention is perceived as likely to achieve its purpose” [18]	The extent to which community pharmacist-delivered PND screening is perceived as likely to achieve its purpose
Self-efficacy	“The participant’s confidence that they can perform the behaviour(s) required to participate in the intervention” [18]	Pharmacists’ confidence that they can perform the behaviour(s) required to participate in community pharmacist-delivered PND screening

PND Perinatal depression