Skip to main content
. 2014 May 6;2014(5):CD009968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009968.pub2
STUDY DESIGN Treatment Group Comparison Group 1 Comparison group 2…N/A
Selection bias:
·         Sequence generation
 
·         Allocation concealment
 
Adequate/Inadequate/Unclear
 
Adequate/Inadequate/Unclear
 
Adequate/Inadequate/Unclear
 
Adequate/Inadequate/Unclear
 
Adequate/Inadequate/Unclear
 
Adequate/Inadequate/Unclear
Performance Bias
·         Blinding of participants
 
·         Blinding of other personnel
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
Detection Bias
·         Use of outcome measure(s) apparent
 
·         Blinding of outcome assessors
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
 
Yes/No/Unclear
Reporting Bias
·         Time lag to publication
·         Language (Please state)
·         Duplicate publication
·         Citation reporting
·         Outcome reporting
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
___________________
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
_____________________
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
___________________
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
Attrition Bias
·         Incomplete outcome data
 
·         Reasons specified
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
 
Yes/No/Unclear
Intention to Treat All participants entering trial 15% or fewer excluded More than 15% excluded Not analysed as ‘intention‐to‐treat’ Unclear Were withdrawals described?    Yes  Š No Š         No Š                        not clear  Š