Table 2.
Papers’ evaluation using critical appraisal tools from Joanna Brigg Institute (JBI)
| No | Author (Year) | JBI Form | Yes | No | Unclear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Belgacem et al. (2013) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 69% | 31% | - |
| 2 | Holm et al. (2016) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 69% | 31% | - |
| 3 | Hudson et al. (2015) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 77% | 15% | 8% |
| 4 | Hudson, Aranda, and Hayman-White (2005) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 69% | 31% | - |
| 5 | Kizza and Muliira (2019) | Quasi-Experimental Appraisal Tool | 89% | 11% | - |
| 6 | Kristanti, Setiyarini, and Effendy (2017) | Quasi-Experimental Appraisal Tool | 78% | 11% | 11% |
| 7 | Narayanan et al. (2023) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 85% | - | 15% |
| 8 | Schulman-Green et al. (2023) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 77% | - | 23% |
| 9 | Shohani et al. (2018) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 62% | - | 38% |
| 10 | Li, Ling, and Zhanyu (2019) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 77% | 15% | 8% |
| 11 | Yanwei et al. (2018) | RCT Appraisal Tool | 69% | 31% | - |