Skip to main content
[Preprint]. 2023 Oct 6:rs.3.rs-3029813. [Version 1] doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3029813/v1

Table 4.

Intervention Satisfaction, Client Meal Supplementation, and Perceived Entrée Size

Across participants (N=66) Group 1 Meal Kits (N=35) Group 2 No-prep (N=31) Difference between groups
Intervention satisfaction 16.56 2.60 17.29 2.31 15.74 2.70 .015 *
Added extra seasoning .727
Yes 44(67%) 24(69%) 20(65%)
No 22(33%) 11 (31 %) 11(35%)
Added extra food .993
Yes 17(26%) 9(26%) 8(26%)
No 49(74%) 26(74%) 23(74%)
Added extra snacks .896
Yes 25(38%) 13(37%) 12(39%)
No 41 (62%) 22(63%) 19(61%)
Breakfast entrée size .385
Not enough food 15(23%) 6(17%) 9(29%)
The right amount of food 48(73%) 28(80%) 20(65%)
Too much food 3(5%) 1 (3%) 2(7%)
Dinner entire size <.001 ***
Not enough food 8(12%) 0(0%) 8(26%)
The right amount of food 57(86%) 35(100%) 22(71%)
Too much food 1 (2%) 0(0%) 1 (3%)

Values are n(%) for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables;

*=

p< .05,

**=

p< .01,

***=

p<.001