Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 13;33(11):3337–3352. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06757-2

Table 5.

Module 2 (part B)—Relative importance of pre-operative patient factors (N = 79 voters in round 2)

Statements (N = 23) N Level of importance Percentage consensus
Patient's levels of general health and fitness 79 Very 98.7%
The presence and/or nature of comorbid illness 79 Very 97.5%
Ability to understand/cognitive level 79 Very 96.2%
Alcohol or other substance abuse 79 Very 96.2%
Psychological health and illness 79 Very 94.9%
Cardiovascular health 79 Very 94.9%
Liver health (including cirrhosis and portal hypertension) 78 Very 94.9%
Patient's level of compliance 79 Very 92.4%
Obesity's impact on patient’s quality of life 79 Very 92.4%
Patient's nutritional status 79 Very 91.1%
Physiological more than chronological age 79 Very 89.9%
Kidney function 78 Very 89.7%
Respiratory health 79 Very 88.6%
Social and/or family network and support 79 Very 84.8%
Presence/nature of physical disabilities 79 Very 84.8%
Current smoking status 79 Very 84.8%
Advanced diabetes mellitus 79 Very 83.5%
Muscle mass (risk of sarcopenia) 78 Very 83.3%
Life span expectations 79 Very 82.3%
Patient's level of physical mobility 79 Very 81.0%
Bone health 79 Very 73.4%
Financial means (e.g., ability to afford vitamins) 79 Very 59.5%
Thyroid disease 78 Not very 53.8%

This list was added in response to an open-ended question asking voters to list factors they considered important in the decision to perform and how to perform surgical or endoscopic bariatric interventions. The order of factors is from highest to lowest percentage perceiving a factor as important. Italicized statements did not reach consensus