Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 23;33(11):3571–3601. doi: 10.1007/s11695-023-06827-5

Table 1.

Summary of characteristics and design for studies included in this systematic review

Author Location Study period Study design Sample size (n) Response rate NOS
Thuan et al., 2005 France NR • Survey sent to 744 general practitioners registered by the regional representation of the Health Department 607 81.6% 5
Avidor et al., 2007 USA Apr 2004–Nov 2004 • Questionnaires self-administered at 6 national meetings to physicians of 6 specialty areas: BARI, OBGYN, IM, ENDO, CARD, and FP 478 NR 6
Sansone et al., 2007 USA NR • Survey mailed to 246 physicians from the department of IM, FM, and OBGYN in a community hospital 99 40% 4
Balduf et al., 2008 NC, USA NR • Survey mailed to 400 FP and 400 IM physicians from North Carolina Health Professions Data System 288 47% 8
Ferrante et al., 2009 NJ, USA March 2008 • Survey of family physicians who were members of the New Jersey Family Medicine Research Network and 136 additional family physicians from a Blue Cross Blue Shield provider directory 255 53% 7
Salinas et al., 2011 USA 2009 • Questionnaire sent to 1000 family physicians and general internists from a national database of “opted-in” physicians matched to AMA Physician Masterfile 293 NR 6
Sarwer et al., 2012 Philadelphia, PA, USA NR • Survey e-mails sent to physicians affiliated with an academic medical center and community-based physicians identified through databases 93 27.4% 7
Claridge et al., 2014 Wellington, New Zealand NR • Qualitative study involving series of 12 semi-structured interviews with general practitioners 12 NR 3
Giaro et al., 2014 Poland 2010–2011 • Anonymous questionnaire administered to surgeons during local educational conferences 143 NR 4
Glauser et al., 2015 USA Feb 2013 • Case vignette survey sent to 1625 PCPs, ENDOs, CARDs, and BARIs identified through Annual AMA Physician Characteristics and Distribution US Report 300 18.46% 6
Kim et al., 2015 New South Wales, Australia Nov 2013–July 2014 • Semi-structured interviews among general practitioners working in primary care organizations 24 75% 6
Stanford et al., 2015 USA July 2014 – Oct 2014 • Online survey sent to PCPs affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital 76 32% 6
Tork et al., 2015 Cincinnati, OH, USA NR • Survey administered to PCPs affiliated with The Good Samaritan TriHealth Hospital 57 35.4% 5
Auspitz et al., 2016 Canada 2014 • Survey administered to all physicians practicing FM and listed in the Canadian Medical Directory 165 12% 5
Funk et al., 2016 WI, USA NR • Focus groups conducted with PCPs who were members of the Wisconsin Research and Education Network 16 61.5% 5
Hirpara et al., 2016 Canada Sep 2012–Dec 2012 • Survey administered to attendees of two general surgery conferences, and recipients of the electronic newsletters from OAGS and CAGS 167 10% 8
Jung et al., 2016 Germany NR • Questionnaire distributed by mail to general practitioners and internists found in the telephone directory 201 16.3% 5
Major et al., 2016 Poland 2015–2016 • Prospective anonymous questionnaire-based study distributed to GPs, physicians from IM, radiology, ophthalmology, endocrinology, palliative care, occupational medicine, public health, and geriatrics 200 NR 4
Stolberg et al., 2017 Denmark Feb 2016–Apr 2016 • Survey administered to 300 PCPs systematically selected from a health platform from the Danish Ministry of Health and Danish Regions 133 44% 7
Zacharoulis et al., 2017 Thessaly, Greece NR • Self-administered survey distributed to 500 physicians, endocrinologists, cardiologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, orthopedics, gynecologists, general surgeons, and other specialties 300 60% 6
Falvo et al., 2018 PA, USA NR • Survey emailed to 160 PCPs at Allegheny Health Network 45 28.1% 5
Martini et al., 2018 France May 2017–July 2017 • E-questionnaire developed by two bariatric surgeons distributed to practicing general practitioners and FPs 288 12.9% 7
McGlone et al., 2018 England 2015 • Survey administered to three different PCP consortiums 35 9.16% 5
Simon et al., 2018 MI, USA May 2017 • Survey administered to providers in primary care (IM, FM, and women’s health) and endocrinology in a large health system 111 26% 4
Conaty et al., 2020 Evanston, IL, USA Mar 2018–Jun 2018 • Survey administered to PCPs at the Northshore University Health System 150 28% 4
El-Beheiry et al., 2020 Manitoba, Canada July 2015–Sep 2015 • Questionnaire mailed to all registered FPs and attendees of the 2016 provincial conference of FPs 131 13.1% 6
Elliott et al., 2020 Denmark NR • Questionnaires administered to orthopedic surgeons, obstetricians/gynecologists, 300 endocrinologists, 169 physicians treating patients with obstructive sleep apnea 345 44% 4
Lopez et al., 2020 WI, USA NR • Questionnaire emailed to PCPs at the Medical College of Wisconsin 41 33.9% 6
Egerer et al., 2021 Aachen, Germany Oct 2019–Mar 2020 • Survey administered to PCPs in the region of a bariatric surgery center at the University Hospital 204 31% 6
Memarian et al., 2021 Skåne & Kronoberg, South Sweden 2019 • Survey emailed to all PCPs with available email addresses 157 14% 6
Özgüc et al., 2021 Turkey 2019 • Survey distributed to PCPs through social media, association websites, and randomly selected physicians 1044 NR 4
Sbraccia et al., 2021 Italy Jun–July 2018 • Online survey administered to persons with obesity and healthcare professionals from Italian cohort of ACTION-IO study 302 (HCPs) NR 6
Zevin et al., 2021 Ontario, Canada Oct 2017–Jun 2018 • Survey emailed to PCPs practicing in the Southeast Local Health Integration Network 92 15.6% 6
Alenezi et al. 2022 Saudi Arabia Mar 2022–Aug 2022 • Study conducted among PCPs in northern Saudi Arabia who work in public hospital settings 280 NR 8
Carrasco et al., 2022 Sweden 2021 • Questionnaire survey sent to PCPs to assess knowledge, attitudes, and adherence to guidelines for obesity treatment guidelines 235 14.3% 3
Holmes et al., 2022 Ontario, Canada 2020 • Survey emailed to all ENDOs, endocrinology residents, and diabetes nurse practitioners at the University of Toronto 48 NR 5
Murtha et al., 2022 USA Aug 2016–May 2017 • Interview-based study conducted among eligible patients and providers (PCPs, bariatric surgeons, registered dieticians, and health psychologists) 40 (providers) 22% 4
Ouni et al., 2022 USA July 2021–Aug 2021 • Questionnaire administered to PCPs at the Mayo Clinic healthcare system 130 40% 4
Zawadzka et al., 2022 Poland Oct 2019 and Jan 2021 • Survey administered to internists, diabetologists, and trainees in both fields attending two virtual conferences via an online, anonymous and self-administered format 64 37.9% 7
Mojkowska et al., 2023 Poland Jan 2019–Sep 2020 • Survey conducted among active HCPs (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, paramedics) 184 NR 4

Abbreviations: ACTION-IO Awareness, Care & Treatment in Obesity Management–An International Observation, AMA American Medical Association, BARI bariatric medicine, CAGS Canadian Association of General Surgeons, CARD cardiologists, ENDO endocrinologists, FM family medicine, FP family practitioners, HCP healthcare professional, IM internal medicine, NOS Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, NR not reported, OAGS Ontario Association of General Surgeons, OBGYN obstetrics/gynecology, PCP primary care physician