Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 26;14:6823. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42212-7

Table 1.

Summary of implemented reaction processes and corresponding Gibbs free energies ΔRG and activation energies ΔG

N0 Reaction ΔRG (kcal/mol) ΔG (kcal/mol)
R1 graphic file with name 41467_2023_42212_Taba_HTML.gif −70.22a 1.9a
R2 graphic file with name 41467_2023_42212_Tabb_HTML.gif

w/o Li+: −30.43b

w/ Li+: −39.17b

w/o Li+: 0c

w/ Li+: 12.05b

R3 graphic file with name 41467_2023_42212_Tabc_HTML.gif −56.5b 2.93b
R4 graphic file with name 41467_2023_42212_Tabd_HTML.gif −90.83b 0c
R5 graphic file with name 41467_2023_42212_Tabe_HTML.gif −54.72b 0c
R6 graphic file with name 41467_2023_42212_Tabf_HTML.gif −0.454d 3d
R7 graphic file with name 41467_2023_42212_Tabg_HTML.gif −0.454d 3d
R8 graphic file with name 41467_2023_42212_Tabh_HTML.gif −0.454d 3d

Energy values were (a) assumed, (b) calculated by DFT, (c) manually set to 0 kcal/mol since the DFT calculations suggested negative values or (d) adapted from ref. 49. TS represents the transition states. Reaction energies for R2 are given for two cases: with (w/) and without (w/o) lithium coordination of EC.