Table 2.
Rate and cause of revisional surgery
| Author, year | Revisional surgery for GERD | Type of revision for GERD | Revisional surgery for IWL/WR | Type of revision for IWL/WR | Revisional surgery during FU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arman, 2016 | 4.8% | RYGB, hiatoplasty | 26.9% | RYGB, DS | 31.7% |
| Castagneto Gissey, 2018 | 1.8% | RYGB | 0% | / | 1.8% |
| Chang, 2018 | N/A | RYGB, hiatoplasty | N/A | RYGB | 21.5% |
| Jimenez, 2020 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 23.8% |
| Felsenreich, 2021 | 18.9% | RYGB | 26.4% | DS | 49.1%* |
| Hauters, 2021 | 0% | / | 18% | RYGB | 18% |
| Musella, 2021 | 2.6% | RYGB | 13.2% | OAGB | 15.8% |
| Kraljević, 2021 | 3.9% | RYGB | 7.8% | DS | 19.2%** |
| Kehagias, 2022 | 1% | RYGB | 0% | / | 1% |
| Avidan, 2023 | 0% | / | 21.25% | RYGB, OAGB | 21.3% |
| Salminen, 2022 | 21.1% | RYGB | 7.8% | SADI-S | 28.9% |
GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease, IWL/WR insufficient weight loss/weight regain, RYGB Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, DS duodenal switch, OAGB one anastomosis gastric bypass
*3.8% were converted due to acute leak
**7.5% were converted due to both GERD and IWL/WR