Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 26;11:57. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00295-4

Table 1.

Gene-expression profiles in bone from Wwtr1-deficient mice

Gene Wild-type Wwtr1+/− Wwtr1Oc-Het Wwtr1Oc-cKO P-value
Osteoblast lineage
Pkd1 1.00 ± 0.15 1.03 ± 0.22 0.99 ± 0.34 0.96 ± 0.32 0.971 8
Wwtr1 1.00 ± 0.24 0.61 ± 0.10*** 0.63 ± 0.14*** 0.36 ± 0.09*** <0.000 1
Fgf23 1.00 ± 0.10 0.97 ± 0.22 1.61 ± 0.45* 2.31 ± 0.61*** <0.000 1
Runx2-II 1.00 ± 0.13 0.80 ± 0.21 0.82 ± 0.27 0.61 ± 0.10** 0.017 7
Osteopontin 1.00 ± 0.26 0.83 ± 0.20 0.67 ± 0.11* 0.62 ± 0.21* 0.014 3
Bsp 1.00 ± 0.11 0.94 ± 0.28 0.68 ± 0.16* 0.54 ± 0.15*** 0.000 3
Mepe 1.00 ± 0.12 1.04 ± 0.22 1.43 ± 0.28** 1.81 ± 0.22*** <0.000 1
Col1 1.00 ± 0.20 0.81 ± 0.23 0.67 ± 0.21* 0.65 ± 0.18* 0.030 4
Alp 1.00 ± 0.20 1.01 ± 0.29 0.69 ± 0.11* 0.52 ± 0.15*** 0.000 2
Osteocalcin 1.00 ± 0.19 0.80 ± 0.23 0.53 ± 0.19** 0.57 ± 0.15** 0.001 3
OPG 1.00 ± 0.13 0.97 ± 0.29 0.89 ± 0.31 0.96 ± 0.24 0.892 6
RankL 1.00 ± 0.17 1.13 ± 0.24 1.12 ± 0.11 1.52 ± 0.15*** <0.000 1
Fzd2 1.00 ± 0.25 1.02 ± 0.18 1.03 ± 0.18 0.96 ± 0.28 0.935 4
Wnt10b 1.00 ± 0.08 1.08 ± 0.28 0.97 ± 0.17 0.73 ± 0.06* 0.016 4
CYR61 1.00 ± 0.13 1.06 ± 0.10 1.54 ± 0.25** 2.06 ± 0.55*** <0.000 1
CTGF 1.00 ± 0.10 1.06 ± 0.28 1.18 ± 0.41 1.54 ± 0.31* 0.022 1
Osteoclast
Trap 1.00 ± 0.15 0.95 ± 0.19 1.10 ± 0.22 1.41 ± 0.19** 0.002 1
Mmp9 1.00 ± 0.14 0.85 ± 0.22 0.87 ± 0.15 0.86 ± 0.18 0.380 8
Chondrocyte
Collagen II 1.00 ± 0.20 0.86 ± 0.20 0.79 ± 0.26 0.67 ± 0.15* 0.045 8
Collagen X 1.00 ± 0.21 0.87 ± 0.36 0.74 ± 0.39 0.45 ± 0.23* 0.033 9
Adipocyte
PPARγ2 1.00 ± 0.17 1.23 ± 0.14 1.57 ± 0.30** 2.03 ± 0.42*** <0.000 1
aP2 1.00 ± 0.18 1.27 ± 0.31 1.64 ± 0.29** 2.51 ± 0.36*** <0.000 1
Lpl 1.00 ± 0.15 1.31 ± 0.37 1.63 ± 0.34* 2.56 ± 0.47*** <0.000 1

Data are mean ± S.D. from 6 tibias of wild-type control, Wwtr1+/−, Wwtr1Oc-Het, and Wwtr1Oc-cKO mice and expressed as the fold changes relative to the housekeeping gene β-actin subsequently normalized to control mice. *, **, *** indicates significant difference from wild-type control at P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.001, respectively. P values were determined by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple-comparisons test