Table 2.
Indicators of Nutrient Balance, and Their Considerations
Indicator | Key Considerations |
---|---|
| |
Reported dietary intakes | • Underreporting of dietary intakes9 biases assessment toward undernutrition |
• 24-hour diet recalls | • Limited to detecting relatively severe nutrient deficits |
• Food records | • Time-intensive to collect and analyze |
• Provides a snapshot of energy and protein adequacy on days of measurement | |
• Requires skilled examiner | |
Recovery biomarkers | • Many sources of measurement error (e.g., nitrogen balance, sampling accuracy, urea losses in urine (nPNA)) |
• UUN | |
• nPNA | • Cannot distinguish low protein intakes from lack of protein in the diet vs. low overall energy intake |
• Provides a snapshot of protein adequacy on days of measurement | |
• Multiple days of measurement rarely available, but generally needed to obtain accurate estimate | |
Δ Nutrition status (Table 2) | • Changes in body composition are more sensitive over longer periods of time (e.g., months) |
• Anthropometric | • Vary in reliability for serial measurements |
• Functional | • Key considerations of nutrition status indicators (Table 4) |
• Concentration biomarkers |
nPNA, normalized protein nitrogen appearance; UUN, urinary urea nitrogen; Δ, change.