Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 20;13(10):860. doi: 10.3390/bs13100860

Table 5.

Visual analysis for the target behaviors of Participant 3.

In-phase analysis:
Target Behavior ToM1 SS1 ToM2 SS2
Sequence A B C A B C A B C A B C
Length 7 6 3 13 8 3 21 8 3 29 9 3
Trend / \ / / /
Trend Stability 100% 75% 100% 100% 87.5% 100% 100% 87.5% 100% 100% 77.8% 100%
Average 0 75 93.33 0 74 100 2.4 70 90 0.7 81.1 100
Level Range 0–0 40–100 90–100 0–0 50–100 100–100 0–10 40–100 90–90 0–10 50–100 100–100
Level Stability 100%
S
16.7%
US
100%
S
100%
S
25%
US
100%
S
0%
US
12.5%
US
100%
S
93.1%
S
22.2%
US
100%
S
Level Change 0–0
(=)
40–100
(+80)
100–90
(=)
0–0
(=)
50–100
(+80)
100–100
(=)
0–0
(=)
40–100
(+50)
90–90
(=)
0–0
(=)
50–100
(+50)
100–100
(=)
C Value 0.80 0.25 0.83 −0.31 0.81 −0.07 0.78
Z Value 2.38 ** 0.71 2.68 ** −1.50 2.63 ** −0.41 2.65 **
Between-stages analysis:
Target Behavior ToM1 SS1 ToM2 SS2
Comparison A/B B/C A/B B/C A/B B/C A/B B/C
Trend Change /
(+)
\
(−)
/
(+)

(=)
/
(+)
\
(−)
/
(+)

(=)
Change Between Levels 0–40
(+40)
100–100
(=)
0–50
(+50)
100–100
(=)
0–40
(+40)
100–90
(−10)
0–50
(+50)
100–100
(=)
Percentage Overlap 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 100%
C Value 0.94 0.23 0.94 0.37 0.84 0.20 0.96 0.21
Z Value 3.66 ** 0.86 4.54 ** 1.11 3.07 ** 0.62 6.07 ** 0.78

Note: ** p < 0.01; S = Stable; US = Unstable.