Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 16;15(20):5010. doi: 10.3390/cancers15205010

Table 3.

Summary of SBRT boost studies in head and neck cancer.

Author (Year)/Subsite/Design Sample Size (n) Median Follow Up (Months) EBRT Dose/Fraction Boost Dose (Gy)/Fraction GTV (cc) or Boost Volume (Range) EQD2 (Gy) (α/β = 10) (Total) BED10 (Gy) (α/β = 10) (Total) Margins for
Stereotactic
Boost (PTV)
LC (%) OS (%) Initial Site of Failure
(N)
Toxicity (N)
Tate et al. (1999)/retrospective/nasopahrynx [44] 23 21 (2–64) 64.8 Gy–70 Gy (Median 66 Gy/ 33 frs) 7–15 Gy /1#frs Median 12 Gy Not reported Median 88 Median 105.6 Not reported 100% Not
reported
Local: 0 Regional: 2 Distant: 7 As expected for EBRT
Le et al. (2003)/retrospective/nasopahrynx [45] 45 31 66 Gy/33 frs 7–15 Gy/1 frs Not reported 88 105.6 Not reported 3 yr LC: 100% 3 yr OS: 75% Local: 0 Regional: 3 Distant: 14 CN weakness: 4 Retinopathy: 1 Asymptomatic TLN: 3
Chen HH et al. (2006) retrospective/nasopahrynx [47] 64 31 (22–54) 64.8 Gy–68.4 Gy/36–38 frs 12–15 Gy/4–5 frs Mean GTV
62.6 (21.1–
145.3)
76.72–83.51 92.06–100.2 CTV
+ 2–3 mm
3 yr LC: 93.1% 3 yr OS: 84.9% Local: 4 Regional: 7 Distant: 7 Late Grade 4: None
Note: 3 fatal nasal bleeding could be not related to SBRT boost
Hara et al. (2008)/retrospective/nasopahrynx [46] 82 40.7 (6.5–144.2) 66 Gy/33 frs 7–15 Gy/1 frs Median GTV
34.2 (6.4–
102.2)
88 105.6 Not reported 5 yr LC: 98% 5 yr OS: 69% Local: 1 Regional: 5 Distant: 27 Retinopathy: 3 Asymptomatic TLN: 8 Symptomatic: 2
Uno T et al. (2010)/retrospective/mixed [48] 10 16 (6–24) 40 Gy–60 Gy/20–30 frs 9–16 Gy/1–3 frs Not reported 54.22–80.44 65.1–96.53 CTV + 0–5 mm CR: 60% PR: 40% Not
reported
Local: 3 Distant: 1 ≥Grade 3: None
Lee DS et al. (2012) retrospective/mixed [50] 26 56 (27.6–80.2) 39.6 Gy–70.2 Gy (Median 50.4 Gy/28 frs) 10–25 Gy/2–5 frs Median 21 Gy/5 frs NPC
median
GTV 45.3
(21.3–
69.4)
Non-NPC
Median
GTV 19.4
(6.9–66.8)
Median 74.41 Median 89.29 GTV + 1- mm 1 yr LRRFR: 91.4% 2 yr LRRFR: 86.3% 2 yr OS: 61.5% 5 yr OS: 46.2% Local: 2 Regional: 1 Distant: 5 ≥Grade 3: 9
Al-Mamgani et al. (2012)/retrospective/oropharynx [51] 51 18 (6–65) 46 Gy/23 frs 16.5 Gy/3 frs Not reported 67.31 80.78 CTV
+ 3 mm
2 yr LC: 86% 3 yr LC: 70% 2 yr OS: 82% 3 yr OS: 54% Local: 5 Regional: 1 Distant: 1 ≥Grade 3: 2 1 feeding tube dependence
Yamazaki H et al. (2014) retrospective/mixed [49] 25 28 (7–128) 35 Gy–70 Gy (Median 50 Gy/25 frs) 12–35 Gy/1–5 frs Median 15 Gy/3 frs Not reported Median 68.75 Median 82.5 2 yr LC: 89% 5 yr LC: 71% 2 yr OS: 83% 5 yr OS: 70% - ≥Grade 3: None
Karam et al., (2014)/retrospective/salivary gland [32] 10 29 (12–120) Median 64.8, range (50–75.6) Median17.5, range (10–
30)/3–6 frs
Not
reported
87.82 (61.11–113.1) 92.5 (75.91–102.3) Definitive= GTV + 15–
20 mm
Post-op CTV + 10–
20 mm
1-yr LC: 90%
2-yr LC: 80%
1 yr:
100%
Local: 1
Distant: 1
≥Grade 3: None
Kataria et al.,
(2015)/retrospective/mixed [55]
9 8 (6–19) 54 (50–60)/(25–30) 15 (10–25)/2–5 frs Median GTV
16.3 (7–
47)
72.7 (62.5–91.2) 87.3 (75–109.5) GTV
+3–5 mm
CR: 55% Not
reported
Distant: 1 ≥Grade 3: None
Diaz-
Martinez et al.,
(2018)/retrospective/Sinonasal/
nasopharynx [56]
9 13.3 (4–32) 64.3 (54–70)/(27–35) 13 (12–20)/1 fr Mean GTV
4.5 (1.17–
8.2)
89.2 (76–120) 107.1 (91.2–144) Not reported 1-yr LC: 100% Not reported Distant: 3 ≥Grade 3: None
Baker S et al. (2018)/retrospective/oropharynx
Baker S et al. (2019)b retrospective/oropharynx [52]
195 42.8 (2.1–98.6) 46 Gy/23 frs 16.5 Gy/3 frs Not
reported
67.31 80.78 CTV
+ 3 mm
5 yr LC: 90% 5 yr OS: 66.7% Local: 18 Regional: 12 Distant: 11 ≥Grade 3: 47
Vempati et al., (2020)/prospective/oropharynx [54] 34 50 60–66/30 frs 8–10/1–2 frs Mean GTVp
70
Mean boost
volume 54
(13–185)
72–79.6 86.4–95.5 CTV = GTV
+ 7 mm
PTV = CTV
+ 3 mm
Median follow up of 50 months LC: 85.3% Median follow up of 50 months OS: 85.3% Local: 1
Regional: 2Distant: 4
≥Grade 3: 4
Dysphagia: 1
Pharyngeal hemorrhage: 3