Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 26;10(10):1604. doi: 10.3390/children10101604

Table 3.

Quality of HRQoL data for eligible participants (time to complete the whole survey, inconsistent responses, and internal consistency) by data collection type, and online panel sample type.

Quality Variable N (%) or Median (IQR)
Survey Sample Recruitment Pathway Online Panel Sample Type
Initial Follow-Up Hospital * Online Panel General Population ** Condition Specific ***
Extremely inconsistent response (+/− three levels) for similar items, n(%)
EQ-5D-Y-5L (pain)/CHU9D (pain) 34 (0.6) 52 (2.2) 6 (0.8) 28 (0.5) 7 (0.5) 21 (0.6)
EQ-5D-Y-5L (looking after self)/CHU9D (daily routine) 90 (1.5) 73 (3.1) 20 (2.6) 70 (1.4) 4 (0.3) 66 (1.8)
Very inconsistent response (+/− two levels) for similar items, n(%)
EQ-5D-Y-5L (pain)/CHU9D (pain) 189 (3.2) 95 (4.1) 40 (5.3) 149 (2.9) 20 (1.3) 129 (3.5)
EQ-5D-Y-5L (looking after self)/CHU9D (daily routine) 407 (6.9) 161 (6.9) 67 (8.8) 340 (6.6) 31 (2.0) 309 (8.5)

Abbreviations: CHU9D—Child Health Utility; EQ-5D-Y—EQ-5D Youth. Note: excludes participants ineligible for failing minimum quality eligibility criteria and duplicate respondents. * Sample 1 (recruited via the hospital pathway), ** Sample 2 (general population sample recruited via the online pane pathway), *** Sample 3 (condition-specific samples recruited via the online panel pathway).