Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 12;11(20):2722. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11202722

Table 2.

Association of composite dietary antioxidant index and aging.

CDAI Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p OR (95% CI) p
Per SD 0.81 (0.77, 0.87) <0.001 0.89 (0.84, 0.95) 0.001 0.90 (0.84, 0.96) 0.001
Cutoff
Low Ref. Ref. Ref.
High 0.69 (0.62, 0.78) <0.001 0.81 (0.71, 0.91) 0.001 0.82 (0.72, 0.93) 0.003
Quantiles
Q1 Ref. Ref. Ref.
Q2 0.83 (0.72, 0.94) 0.005 0.90 (0.77, 1.04) 0.146 0.89 (0.76, 1.04) 0.141
Q3 0.73 (0.61, 0.86) <0.001 0.84 (0.70, 1.01) 0.061 0.87 (0.70, 1.06) 0.163
Q4 0.66 (0.56, 0.79) <0.001 0.80 (0.67, 0.96) 0.016 0.82 (0.69, 0.98) 0.032
Q5 0.52 (0.44, 0.60) <0.001 0.66 (0.56, 0.78) <0.001 0.68 (0.57, 0.81) <0.001
P for trend <0.001 <0.001 0.014

Model 1 was a crude model. Model 2 was adjusted for sex, race, BMI, education level, PIR, health insurance, smoke, and alcohol. Model 3 was adjusted for model 2 and DM, CVD, hypertension, cancer history, CRP, and albumin.