Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 16;28(20):7107. doi: 10.3390/molecules28207107

Table 5.

Correlation matrix (r) of log kw parameters obtained by HPLC using various stationary phases and log P parameters calculated using various computational approaches.

Descriptor log kw C-18 log kw IAM log kw Chol log K HSA log K AGP
log P 1 0.84 (4, 16) 5 0.90 (4, 16) 5 0.84 (4, 16) 5 0.79 (4, 16) 5 0.83
C log P 1 0.87 (16) 5 0.87 (16) 5 0.84 (4, 16) 5 0.72 (7, 16) 5 0.92 (13) 5
S + log P 2 0.89 (16) 5 0.89 (18) 5 0.82 (4, 16) 5 0.68 (7) 5 0.93 (13) 5
S + log D 2 0.89 (16) 5 0.85 0.82 (4, 16) 5 0.68 (7) 5 0.92 (13) 5
M log P 3 0.90 (16) 5 0.85 (16) 5 0.81 (4, 16) 5 0.60 (7) 5 0.91 (13) 5
ALogP 3 0.89 (16) 5 0.81 0.82 (8, 16) 5 0.56 0.83 (13) 5
log P (M-K) 4 0.89 (4, 16) 5 0.83 0.86 (4, 16) 5 0.70 (16) 5 0.94 (13) 5

1—log P models calculated by ChemDraw Ultra 10.0. software [38]. 2—log P calculated by MedChem Designer 3.0.0.30 software [40]. 3—log P calculated by Percepta 2.0 [39]. 4—log P model prediction by Vega QSAR [35]. 5—outlier compounds.