Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 13;16(10):1457. doi: 10.3390/ph16101457

Table 3.

Summary and comparison of vital signs among the treatments.

Vital Sign Timepoint of Measurement (1)
Screening
(n = 36)
Tamsulosin Alone (T1)
(n = 35)
Mirabegron Alone (T2)
(n = 34)
Tamsulosin + Mirabegron (T3)
(n = 34)
p-Value (2)
SBP (mmHg) 128.97 (12.04) 119.23 (8.92) 120.56 (9.56) 117.18 (8.72) 0.3058
DBP (mmHg) 78.78 (8.25) 76.26 (9.71) 73.76 (6.77) 75.29 (8.61) 0.4708
HR (bpm) 77.08 (9.47) 64.97 (9.28) 67.97 (8.82) 67.00 (8.32) 0.5490
Change from the Screening in each treatment
SBP (mmHg) - −10.57 (12.99) −9.06 (11.22) −12.44 (12.24) 0.5120
DBP (mmHg) - −2.83 (10.34) −5.06 (7.65) −3.53 (10.84) 0.6243
HR (bpm) - −12.26 (10.84) −12.44 (11.27) −10.41 (10.07) 0.6898

(1) Measured at 0 h (pre-dose) in the steady state of each period: day 5 in tamsulosin alone (T1), day 19 in mirabegron alone (T2), and day 26 in the combination (T3). (2) The differences among the 3 treatments were compared using one-way analysis of variance. Data from the screening were excluded from the statistical analysis. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation). DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure.