Table 2.
Summary of the benefits and drawbacks of numerous printing techniques.
Technique | Materials | Application | Benefits | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) | Poly(lactic acid) (PLA), Polyethylene glycol (PEG), Polyethylene oxide (PEO), etc. | Customized implants, surgical guides, prosthetics, etc. | Low-cost, versatile, and easy to use | Limited strength and stiffness, poor resolution, and surface finish |
Stereolithography (SLA) | Photopolymerizable resins, such as acrylates, epoxies, and polyurethanes | Dental models, prosthetics, surgical guides, etc. | High resolution, smooth surface finish, and accuracy | Expensive, limited material selection, and potentially toxic photoinitiators |
Selective laser sintering (SLS) | Polyamide (PA), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide (PEI), etc. | Customized implants, surgical tools, prosthetics, etc. | High strength, durability, and complex geometries | Expensive, limited resolution, and surface finish |
Inkjet printing (IJP) | Hydrogels, synthetic polymers, bioinks, etc. | Tissue engineering, drug delivery, and regenerative medicine | High flexibility, scalability, and control over composition | Limited mechanical properties, resolution, and stability |
Electrospinning (ESP) | Polycaprolactone (PCL), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), collagen, etc. | Tissue engineering, wound healing, and drug delivery | High porosity, biocompatibility, and fiber diameter control | Limited mechanical strength and complex 3D structures |
Digital light processing (DLP) | Poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA), methacrylated gelatin (GelMA), polyurethane (PU), etc. | Tissue engineering, drug delivery, and surgical planning | High resolution, accuracy, and speed | Limited material selection, biocompatibility concerns, and light scattering in thick structures |