Table 2.
Policy Alternative Decision Matrix
| Criteria | Weights | Option 1: Legislature acknowledge NH HT |
Option 2: NH HT Task Force |
Option 3: Eliminate status offense & Support restorative programs |
Option 4: Fund programs that heal HT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Effectiveness of Addressing Problem | 2 | + | + | + | + |
| Ease of Implementation | 1 | + | + | + | + |
| Cost of Implementation | 2 | + | + | + | + |
| Viability of Passage | 3 | - | - | +/- | +/- |
| Public Optics | 2 | +/- | + | +/- | + |
| Time to Results | 2 | - | +/- | - | - |
| Total + | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Total - | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
| Net value | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| Weighted total + | 7 | 9 | 10 | 10 | |
| Weighted total - | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
| Final Weighted value | 0 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
NH=Native Hawaiian, HT=historical trauma
Note: This sample matrix provides frequently used criteria along with sample weights. An option that meets the criteria receives a +, while an option that does not meet the criteria receives a -. Options that neither fully meet, but do have some elements of a criteria may recieve a +/-. All of the + and – are added up and then multiplied by the appropriate weights to receive a final weighted value, which is then used to compare across the policy options.