Abstract
Nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) play a critical role in maintaining the equilibrium between the nucleus and cytoplasm, enabling bidirectional transport across the nuclear envelope, and are essential for proper nuclear organization and gene regulation. Perturbations in the regulatory mechanisms governing NPCs and nuclear envelope homeostasis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several neurodegenerative diseases. The ESCRT-III pathway emerges as a critical player in the surveillance and preservation of well-assembled, functional NPCs, as well as nuclear envelope sealing. Recent studies have provided insights into the involvement of nuclear ESCRT-III in the selective reduction of specific nucleoporins associated with neurodegenerative pathologies. Thus, maintaining quality control of the nuclear envelope and NPCs represents a pivotal element in the pathological cascade leading to neurodegenerative diseases. This review describes the constituents of the nuclear-cytoplasmic transport machinery, encompassing the nuclear envelope, NPC, and ESCRT proteins, and how their structural and functional alterations contribute to the development of neurodegenerative diseases.
Keywords: nuclear pore complex, nucleoporins, nucleocytoplasmic transport, ESCRT, ALS, FTD, neurodegeneration
Graphical Abstract

In this review, the authors detail and discuss recent literature documenting nuclear pore complex, nucleocytoplasmic transport, and nuclear envelope alterations in neurodegenerative disease.
Introduction
The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is a pivotal player in the regulation of material exchange between the nucleus and cytoplasm. This sophisticated structure is made up of around 30 nucleoporins (Nups) that are organized into subcomplexes, forming eight modular units in total [1–7]. The NPC monitors the entry and exit of a range of cargos, including proteins and transcripts, into and out of the nucleus. Many Nups are responsible for providing structural integrity, scaffolding support, and anchoring of the NPC into the nuclear envelope. In contrast, roughly one third of Nups contain phenylalanine-glycine (FG) repeats to form the permeability barrier of the NPC. This barrier of intrinsically disordered FG repeat Nups is maintained by weak hydrophobic interactions between FG repeats themselves and functions to prevent or significantly slow the passive diffusion of larger cargo molecules (>60 kDa) into the nucleus [8–14]. However, this is not a strict size exclusion cutoff and can vary due to a number of factors including FG-Nup density and charge within the central channel, overall Nup composition within NPCs, and perhaps even the properties of the macromolecules undergoing passive transport themselves [12, 15]. It is unknown at this time whether the “rules” governing passive diffusion through the NPC can also vary amongst cell types. On the other hand, the well-defined active nucleocytoplasmic transport (NCT) process through the NPC is powered by the RanGTP-RanGDP gradient across the nuclear membrane. This gradient is established by the RanGEF RCC1, the RanGTPase activating protein RanGAP, and the nuclear transport factor NTF2. Specifically, RCC1, bound to chromatin ensures nuclear RanGTP levels remain high and RanGAP localized in the cytoplasm and at the cytoplasmic face of the NPC functions in cooperation with the RanGTP binding proteins RANBP1 and RANBP2 to drive GTP hydrolysis thereby maintaining RanGDP levels in the cytoplasm. This hydrolyzed RanGDP complex is transported back into the nucleus via NTF2 thereby facilitating interactions with RCC1 [13, 16–25]. To provide specificity and directionality of active nucleocytoplasmic transport, nuclear transport receptors (NTRs), broadly termed importins and exportins, recognize specific nuclear localization (NLS) and nuclear export sequences (NES) and interact with FG Nups to direct the flow of cargos through the NPC [13, 23, 24, 26–31].
Recent studies have highlighted alterations to the NPC, NTRs, and NCT as early and significant contributors to neurodegenerative disease pathophysiology [32]. Perhaps one of the earliest indications of disrupted nuclear-cytoplasmic compartmentalization in neurodegenerative disease stems from landmark studies identifying nuclear clearing and cytoplasmic mislocalization/aggregation of the nuclear RNA binding protein TDP-43 as a prominent pathology hallmark in neurodegeneration [33, 34]. More recently, evidence more directly implicating the NPC and NTRs in impaired nuclear-cytoplasmic compartmentalization in neurodegeneration has been reported. Specifically, reduction of specific Nups from the NPC, cytoplasmic aggregation of Nups and NTRs, as well as nuclear envelope abnormalities have all been documented in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD), and Huntington’s Disease (HD) [35–48]}. In this review we detail and discuss alterations to the NPC, NE, and NTR machinery and highlight emerging mechanisms by which these disruptions occur and impact pathophysiological events in neurodegenerative disease.
Nuclear pore complex assembly and maintenance
There are two modes of NPC assembly: interphase assembly and postmitotic assembly. Interphase NPC assembly takes place within the continuous double-lipid nuclear envelope bilayer and involves the asymmetric insertion of NPCs into the nuclear membrane. This process begins with the invagination of the inner nuclear membrane towards the outer nuclear membrane and thus it occurs through an “inside out” mechanism. The nuclear ring then assembles within this newly created “dome” within the nuclear membrane ultimately resulting in a fusion of the outer and inner nuclear membrane on either side of the NPC [4, 49–53]. This process is initiated during telophase following the completion of nuclear membrane sealing when the postmitotic nucleus expands its surface to facilitate nuclear import and chromosome decompaction. There are multiple proposed models by which interphase NPC assembly may occur: 1) The newly synthesized NPC components could be inserted into existing NPCs, forming enlarged mother NPCs that split into daughter NPCs, 2) the new NPC components could be newly incorporated into a region of the nuclear envelope devoid of preexisting NPCs, or 3) NPCs could be assimilated into vesicular intermediates that can later be fused to the nuclear envelope. Notably, interphase NPC assembly is an order of magnitude slower than postmitotic assembly, and it recruits components in a different order. For example, POM121 is recruited before the Nup107–160 complex in interphase assembly, whereas this order is reversed in postmitotic assembly. Additionally, interphase NPC assembly may require the function of the ESCRT-III/VPS4 complex to facilitate membrane sealing and maintain nuclear-cytoplasmic compartmentalization during the membrane fusion steps. [49, 50, 54–58]. Postmitotic NPC assembly occurs after cell division and is faster than interphase NPC assembly [49]. This process is initiated by the dephosphorylation of specific Nups such as Nup98 by CDK1 to facilitate NPC disassembly [59]. NPC assembly then starts with the binding of the nuclear ring component ELYS to chromatin in mid-anaphase, followed by the recruitment of the Nup107–160 complex and other transmembrane Nups, including NDC1 and POM121. Ultimately, this leads to the recruitment of other inner ring components, such as Nup205, Nup188, and Nup93, followed by the Nup62 complex, which forms the central channel component ultimately establishing the passive diffusion permeability barrier and active transport competent NPCs [49, 57, 58, 60].
In proliferating cells, Nups undergo active replacement through selective autophagy-lysosome pathways or the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway [61–64]. However, core scaffold components of the NPC have long lifespans in both dividing yeast cells and postmitotic cells [65–68]. The loss of mitotic renewal in terminally differentiated cells highlights the need for alternative turnover pathways for NPCs. Studies using C2C12 myoblast-derived mouse muscle cells shed light on NPC maintenance in non-dividing cells showing two distinct turnover mechanisms: myotubes exhibited a piecemeal replacement of individual Nups components at different rates, while quiescent cells replaced entire NPCs with newly assembled ones [67]. It is likely that when Nups are incorrectly assembled or malfunctioning, it can impair the structural and functional integrity of NPCs. Interestingly, the deterioration of NPCs with age and the loss of nuclear integrity have been implicated in the age-related decline of postmitotic cell function and the development of degenerative diseases [32, 65, 69, 70]. However, the mechanisms that underlie NPC maintenance in long-lived non-dividing human neurons remain unknown at this time.
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Dementia
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease culminating in the degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons and local interneurons as well as glial cell dysfunction within the motor circuitry [71, 72]. Disease causative mutations in over 20 genes have been linked to ALS. However, only about 10% of ALS cases are inherited (fALS) and the remaining 90% of cases are termed sporadic ALS (sALS) [73–75]. The most frequently observed mutation is a hexanucleotide repeat expansion (HRE) in the first intron of the C9orf72 gene accounting for about 40% of fALS and 8% of sALS [76, 77]. Interestingly the C9orf72 HRE is also the most common cause of familial forms of frontotemporal dementia (FTD), the second most common form of dementia characterized by progressive dysfunction and loss of neuronal populations within the frontal and temporal cortices. In fact, in some families, these mutations can cause ALS, FTD, or in a subset of patients both ALS and FTD [76–82]. Consistent with C9orf72 centric clinical genetics, up to 50% of ALS patients can display a mild cognitive impairment and about 15% are diagnosed with FTD [82, 83].
Pathologically, 97% of ALS cases, about 50% of FTD, and up to 50% of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) cases display nuclear clearing and subsequent cytoplasmic mislocalization and/or aggregation of the normally nuclear RNA binding protein TAR DNA Binding Protein (TDP-43) in end-stage autopsy tissue [79, 84–88]. Thus, despite the distinct clinical manifestations and differences in CNS regions implicated in disease, ALS and FTD are considered to be on a spectrum of neurodegenerative disease due to shared genetic and pathological underpinnings. Thus, these commonalities suggest that these age-related neurodegenerative disease may also share pathophysiological underpinnings. Below, we will discuss recent documentations of NPC and NCT alterations in ALS and FTD pathophysiology.
Nuclear pore complexes, Nuclear Transport Receptors, and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport in ALS and FTD
In 2015, a landmark study was the first to detail disruptions in nucleocytoplasmic transport in C9orf72 ALS. Using induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) derived neurons (iPSNs), fly models, and postmortem human tissues, the authors demonstrated that expression of the C9orf72 HRE disrupts the localization of Ran GTPase and functionally compromise active nuclear import [46]. Subsequent work has demonstrated that dipeptide repeat proteins (DPRs) non-canonically translated from repeat RNA species may also impact NCT [89–91] perhaps through direct interactions with NTRs that impede cargo loading/unloading at the NPC [44]. However, we note that the impact of DPRs on NCT remains controversial. For example, one report suggested that artificial PolyPR peptides can localize to the central channel of the NPC in Xenopus oocytes and impede nuclear import and export capacity in U2OS cells [90]. Notably, the localization of PolyPR peptides to the NPC central channel or NPC itself has not been observed in authentic human disease tissue [76, 77, 92–95]. Moreover, a recent report has suggested that PolyGR and PolyPR DPRs do not interfere with NCT in HeLa and SH-SY5Y cells as well as iPSNs [96]. Thus, these studies suggest that the experimental results may be significantly impacted by the model system and specific DPR constructs or peptides utilized. Further, a recent study has suggested that DPR-induced phenotypes can be altered by commonly utilized fluorescent tags [97]. Fewer studies have centered around the contribution of repeat RNA itself to disrupted NPCs and NCT. However, two reports clearly demonstrate that pathologic G4C2 repeat RNA compromises Nup expression and localization within the NPC [37] and sequesters RanGAP1 to impede NCT [46]. Importantly, RanGap1 aggregation and reduction of Nups from the NPC were also observed in postmortem C9orf72 patient CNS tissues [37, 46] suggesting that they occur in human disease.
A number of studies have now documented the mislocalization and/or nuclear and cytoplasmic aggregation of a number of elements of the nuclear transport machinery including Nup62, RanGap1, and additional Nups and NTRs in familial and sporadic forms of ALS [35, 42, 46–48, 91, 98–101]. Interestingly, the cytoplasmic localization/mislocalization of Nups and NTRs has been linked to RNA binding protein aggregation [42, 48, 102]. Specifically, the RNA binding proteins TDP-43 and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS), which have been genetically linked to a small number of ALS cases [103, 104], form characteristic insoluble aggregates in disease at least in part due to aberrant phase transitions [84, 105]. It is hypothesized that these RNA binding protein aggregates sequester Nups and NTRs which may contribute to neuronal demise. Nup62 and TDP-43 inclusions are frequently found in ALS/FTD, suggesting that cytoplasmic Nup62 may contribute to TDP-43 pathology [42]. Further, Nup62 and FUS directly interact and Nup62 impacts FUS droplet formation [48, 106]. Moreover, nuclear import receptors have been shown to reverse aberrant phase separation and aggregation of TDP-43, FUS, and DPRs [102, 107–110] suggesting not only pathological but potentially therapeutic implications for NTR – RNA binding protein interactions in neurodegeneration.
Although cytoplasmic aggregates have been shown to interfere with the NCT of protein and RNA [111], it is unknown whether specific Nup and NTR mislocalization and/or aggregation observed in ALS is sufficient to directly impact NCT and impact overall NPC composition. For example, it remains unknown what proportion of Nup or NTR molecules must be sequestered away from their normal function to directly impact NCT. It also remains unclear as to how many independent Nups and NTRs need to be pathologically impacted to impede NCT and whether others may be able to functionally compensate at least until a threshold of sequestration is reached. In addition, cytoplasmic aggregation may reflect a pathological sequestration of cytoplasmic pools of Nups that are either newly synthesized or have normal cytoplasmic functions and thus may not directly affect the overall composition of the NPC itself.
In contrast, recent work has used super resolution imaging strategies to examine the expression and localization of 23 individual Nup proteins in iPSNs and postmortem human CNS tissues. These comprehensive studies demonstrated a reduction of roughly eight specific Nups (POM121, GP210, NDC1, Nup133, Nup107, Nup50, TPR, Nup153 (sALS), and Nup98 (C9orf72 ALS/FTD) from the nucleus, presumably NPCs, in both sALS and C9orf72 ALS/FTD [36, 37]. A series of rapid protein degradation and overexpression studies concluded that NPC injury events were initiated by a reduction of the transmembrane Nup POM121. Moreover, the authors of these studies showed that the collective reduction of Nups from the NPC was sufficient to impact the subcellular distribution of Ran GTPase, functional active nuclear import, the localization and function of TDP-43, and overall neuronal survival [36, 37].
NPCs and their Nup constituents are extremely long-lived, especially in non-diving post-mitotic cells such as neurons [66–68]. However, it has been shown that individual Nup proteins within NPCs can exchange and turnover at varying rates in a piecemeal manner [67, 112, 113]. Interestingly, some Nups contain a NLS or NES that functions to facilitate their insertion into the NPC or nuclear envelope [114, 115]. Thus, it is possible that deficits in functional NCT compromise Nup exchange and turnover to contribute to both the reduction of specific Nups from the NPC and nuclear and cytoplasmic Nup accumulations observed in neurodegenerative disease (Table 1, Figure 1).
Table 1:
Summary of Nup, NTR, and nuclear envelope alterations observed in model systems of neurodegenerative disease.
| Neurodegenerative Disease | NPC Subdomain, NTR, or NE Localization | Protein Affected | Alteration | Model System | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis | Cytoplasmic Ring and Filaments | Nup88 | Altered nuclear envelope distribution | SOD1 A4V ALS and sALS human spinal cord | Kinoshita et al., 2009 |
| Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Nup214 | Reduced protein expression | Drosophila brains expressing 30 GGGGCC repeats | Dubey et al., 2023 | ||
| Reduced expression and altered distribution at the nuclear envelope (mAb414) | Primary mouse motor neurons and human lymphoblast cells expressing PFN1 mutants | Giampetruzzi et al., 2019 | |||
| Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF and TDP-43 Q331K | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Nup358 (RanBP2) | Reduced expression and altered distribution at the nuclear envelope (mAb414) | Primary mouse motor neurons and human lymphoblast cells expressing PFN1 mutants | Giampetruzzi et al., 2019 | ||
| Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF and TDP-43 Q331K | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Outer Ring | Nup107 | Reduced nuclear expresion | C9orf72 iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2020 | |
| Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 human motor cortex and thoracic spinal cord | Coyne et al., 2020 | |||
| Perinuclear aggregation | C9orf72 human motor cortex | Zhang et al., 2015 | |||
| Perinuclear aggregation | Drosophila salivary gland expressing 58 GGGGCC repeats | Freibauman et al., 2015 | |||
| Mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF and TDP-43 Q331K | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Nup133 | Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 human induced pluripotent stem cell derived neurons | Coyne et al., 2020 | ||
| Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 human motor cortex and thoracic spinal cord | Coyne et al., 2020 | |||
| Reduced nuclear expression | sALS iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2021 | |||
| Nup160 | Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | ||
| Inner Ring | Nup35 | Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | |
| Nup93 | Reduced nuclear expression and increased cytoplasmic expression | Drosophila brains expressing 30 GGGGCC repeats | Dubey et al., 2023 | ||
| Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF, TDP-43 WT and TDP-43 Q331K | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Nup155 | Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | ||
| Nup205 | Altered nuclear localization | C9orf72 human motor cortex | Zhang et al., 2015 | ||
| Alterated nuclear distribution | C9orf72 and TDP-43 mutart fibroblasts | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Abnormal localization and perinuclear and cytoplasmic aggregation | C9orf72 human motor cortex | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Perinuclear aggregation | C9orf72 iPSNs | Zhang et al., 2015 | |||
| Decreased immunoreactivty and cytoplasmic aggregation | sALS and TDP mutant human motor cortex | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Central Channel | Nup58 | Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | |
| Nup62 | Reduced nuclear expression | iPSC neurons with lentivral-mediated GR50 expression | Gleixner et al., 2022 | ||
| Reduced expression at the nuclear envelope (mAb414) | Primary mouse motor neurons and human lymphoblast cells expressing PFN1 mutants | Giampetruzzi et al., 2019 | |||
| Decreased immunoreactivty and altered nuclear envelope distribution | sALS human spinal cord | Aisawa et al., 2019 | |||
| Decreased nuclear expression and cytoplasmic aggregation | sALS, C9orf72, and TDP-43 mutant human spinal cord | Khalil et al., 2022 | |||
| Altered nuclear envelope distribution | SOD1 A4V ALS and sALS human spinal cord | Kinoshita et al., 2009 | |||
| Altered nuclear envelope distribution | SOD1 G93A mouse spinal cord | Kinoshita et al., 2009 | |||
| Altered nuclear envelope distribution and cytoplasmic mislocalization | FUS mutant iPSNs | Lin et al., 2021 | |||
| Disrupted nuclear envelope distribution, mislocalization, and aggregation | C9orf72 and sALS human motor cortex | Gleixner et al., 2022 | |||
| Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation and reduced nuclear expression | HEK293 cells expressing GR50 | Gleixner et al., 2022 | |||
| Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF, TDP-43 WT and TDP-43 Q331K | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Nup98 | Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2020 | ||
| Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 human motor cortex and thoracic spinal cord | Coyne et al., 2020 | |||
| Reduced expression and cytoplasmic mislocalization | Drosophila brains expressing 30 GGGGCC repeats | Dubey et al., 2023 | |||
| Mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF, TDP-43 WT and TDP-43 Q331K | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Nuclear Basket | Nup50 | Reduced nuclear expression | sALS iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2021 | |
| Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2020 | |||
| Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 human motor cortex and thoracic spinal cord | Coyne et al., 2020 | |||
| Reduced expression and cytoplasmic mislocalization | Drosophila brains expressing 30 GGGGCC repeats | Dubey et al., 2023 | |||
| Altered nuclear envelope distribution | Drosophila expressing poly-GA 64 or poly-GR 64 | Solomon et al., 2018 | |||
| Nup153 | Reduced nuclear expression | sALS iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2021 | ||
| Reduced expression and altered distribution at the nuclear envelope (mAb414) | PrimaiY mouse motor neurons and human lymphoblast cells expressing PFN1 mutants | Giampetruzzi et al., 2019 | |||
| Abnormal nuclear distribution | SOD1 A4V ALS and sALS human spinal cord | Kinoshita et al., 2009 | |||
| Mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF and TDP-43 WT | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| TPR | Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2020 | ||
| Reduced nuclear expression | sALS iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2021 | |||
| Reduced total protein level and cytoplasmic mislocalization | Drosophila brains expressing 30 GGGGCC repeats | Dubey et al., 2023 | |||
| Transmembrane Ring | GP210 | Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2020 | |
| Mislocalization | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF and TDP-43 Q331K | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| NDC1 | Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2020 | ||
| POM121 | Reduced nuclear expression | sALS iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2021 | ||
| Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2020 | |||
| Reduced nuclear expression | C9orf72 human motor cortex and thoracic spinal cord | Coyne et al., 2020 | |||
| Reduced expression at nuclear envelope | Primary mouse motor neurons and human lymphoblast cells expressing PFN1 mutants | Giampetruzzi et al., 2019 | |||
| Mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Nuclear Transport Receptors and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins | Aladin | Mislocalization | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | |
| Gle1 | Cytoplasmatic mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF and TDP-43 Q331K | Chou et al., 2018 | ||
| KPNA2 | Reduced expression, increased cytoplasmic distribution | sALS human spinal cord | Nishimura et al. 2010 | ||
| Nuclear depletion and cytoplasmic accumulation | Drosophila expressing poly-GA64/poly-GR64/ΔNLS-TDP-43, human TDP-43/TDP-43Q331K in salivary gland cells | Solomon et al., 2018 | |||
| KPNA3 | Nuclear depletion and cytoplasmic accumulation | Salivary gland cells of Drosophila expressing ΔNLS-TDP-43, human TDP-43 WT or TDP-43 Q331K | Solomon et al., 2018 | ||
| KPNA6 | Reduced expression | sALS human spinal cord | Nishimura et al. 2010 | ||
| KPNB1 | Reduced nuclear expression | sALS human spinal cord | Kinoshita et al., 2017 | ||
| Reduced nuclear and nuclear envelope expression and cytoplasmic aggregation | C9orf72 and TDP-43 mutart human spinal cord | Khalil et al., 2022 | |||
| Altered nuclear envelope distribution, increased cytoplasmic localization | sALS human spinal cord | Aizawa et al., 2019 | |||
| RanGap1 | Nuclear accumulation | C9orf72 iPSNs | Zhang et al., 2015 | ||
| Nuclear accumulation | Drosophila S2 cells expressing (G4C2)30 | Zhang et al., 2015 | |||
| Abnormal nuclear localization | C9orf72 human motor cortex | Zhang et al., 2015 | |||
| Altered nuclear envelope distribution | Mice expressing AAV (G4C2)149 | Chew et al., 2019 | |||
| Altered distribution | Mouse primal cortical neurons expressing TDP 43 CTF or TDP-43-mtNLS | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Increased nuclear localization | TDP-43 A315T mouse model | Gautam et al., 2019 | |||
| Ran GTPase | Reduced nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio | C9orf72 iPSNs | Zhang et al., 2015 | ||
| Reduced nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio | C9orf72 iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2020 | |||
| Reduced nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio | Drosophila S2 cells expressing (G4C2)30 | Zhang et al., 2015 | |||
| Reduced nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio | sALS iPSNs | Coyne et al., 2021 | |||
| Nuclear reduction | C9orf72 iPSNs | Jovičić et al., 2015 | |||
| THOC2 | Cytoplasmic mislocalization | HEK293T cells expressing TDP-43 fragments | Woerner et al., 2016 | ||
| TPNO1 | Cytoplasmic aggregation | TDP-43 A315T mouse model | Gautam et al., 2019 | ||
| XPO5 | Mislocalization and aggregation | Neuro-2A cells expressing TDP-43 CTF | Chou et al., 2018 | ||
| Nuclear Envelope | Lamin B1 | Abnormal nuclear envelope distribution | C9orf72 and TDP-43 mutant patient fibroblasts | Chou et al., 2018 | |
| Abnormal nuclear envelope distribution | TDP-43 mutant iPSNs | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Abnormal nuclear envelope distribution | Mouse primary cortical neurons expressing TDP-43 CTF, TDP-43 Q331K, or TDP-43 M337V | Chou et al., 2018 | |||
| Lamin C | Abnormal nuclear envelope distribution | Drosophila salivary gland expressing 58 GGGGCC repeats | Freibaum et al., 2015 | ||
| Frontotemporal Dementi a/Alzheimer’s Disease | Central Channel | Nup62 | Perinuclear co-aggregation with phospho-Tau | FTD/AD human hippocampus | Eftekharzadeh et al., 2018 |
| Nup98 | Perinuclear co-aggregation with phospho-Tau | Mice expressing Tau P301L | Eftekharzadeh et al., 2018 | ||
| Perinuclear co-aggregation with phospho-Tau | FTD/AD human hippocampus | Eftekharzadeh et al., 2018 | |||
| Perinuclear aggregation | Tau mutant iPSNs | Paonessa et al., 2019 | |||
| Nuclear Transport Receptors and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins | KPNA2 | Reduced expression | FTD-TDP human frontal cortex | Nishimura et al. 2010 | |
| KPNA3 | Reduced nuclear expression and cytoplasmic accumulation | C9orf72 and sFTD | Solomon et al., 2018 | ||
| KPNA4 | Reduced nuclear expression and cytoplasmic accumulation, reduced solubility | C9orf72 and sFTD human frontal cortex | Solomon et al., 2018 | ||
| Huntington’s Disease | Cytoplasmatic Ring and Filaments | Nup88 | Abnormal nuclear distribution and co-aggregation with mHTT | mHTT mouse model | Grima et al., 2017 |
| Co-aggregation with mHTT | HEK293 cells expressing PolyQ | Suhr et al., 2009 | |||
| Nup214 | Co-aggregation with mHTT | HEK293 cells expressing PolyQ | Suhr et al., 2009 | ||
| Nup358 | Co-aggregation with mHTT | HEK293 cells expressing PolyQ | Suhr et al., 2009 | ||
| Central Channel | Nup62 | Abnormal nuclear distribution and co-aggregation with mHTT | mHTT mouse model | Grima et al., 2017 | |
| Abnormal local izaiton | human striatum and cortex | Grima et al., 2017 | |||
| Cytoplasmic mislocalization | HD iPSNs | Grima et al., 2017 | |||
| Co-aggregation with mHTT | HEK293 cells expressing PolyQ | Suhr et al., 2009 | |||
| Nuclear Basket | Nup153 | Co-aggregation with mHTT | HEK293 cells expressing PolyQ | Suhr et al., 2009 | |
| Transmembrane Ring | POM121 | Co-aggregation with mHTT | HEK293 cells expressing PolyQ | Suhr et al., 2009 | |
| Nuclear Transport Receptors and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Proteins | Gle1 | Abnormal nuclear distribution and co-aggregation with mHTT | mHTT mouse model | Gasset-Rosa et al., 2017 | |
| RanGAP1 | Co-aggregation with mHTT | mHTT mouse model | Grima et al., 2017 | ||
| Intranuclear accumulation | human striatum and cortex | Grima et al., 2017 | |||
| Cytoplasmic mislocalization | HD iPSNs | Grima et al., 2017 | |||
| Abnormal nuclear distribution and co-aggregation with mHTT | mHTT mouse model | Gasset-Rosa et al., 2017 | |||
| Abnormal nuclear distribution | human cortex | Gasset-Rosa et al., 2017 | |||
| Ran GTPase | Reduced nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio | HD iPSNs | Grima et al., 2017 | ||
| Reduced nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio | primary mouse cortical neurons expressing mHTT | Grima et al., 2017 | |||
| KPNA2 | Co-aggregation with mHTT | primary mouse neurons expressing mHTT | Woerner et al., 2016 | ||
| KPNA4 | Co-aggregation with mHTT | primary mouse neurons expressing mHTT | Woerner et al., 2016 | ||
| Nuclear Envelope | Lamin B1 | Abnormal nuclear distribution and morphology | mHTT mouse model | Gasset-Rosa et al., 2017 |
Figure 1: Nuclear pore complex, nuclear envelope, and nuclear transport receptor pathology in neurodegeneration.

Graphical depiction of Nup, NTR, and nuclear envelope pathologies documented in neurodegenerative disease. Normally, intact and functional NPCs maintain proper nucleocytoplasmic compartmentalization. NTRs (red circles) facilitate the active nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of macromolecules between the nucleus and cytoplasm. The ESCRT-III protein CHMP7 (purple circles) can passively diffuse into the nucleus to maintain NPC and nuclear envelope homeostasis (in cooperation with other ESCRT-III proteins). However, nuclear levels remain low due to active nuclear export. TDP-43 (green circles) is predominantly localized to the nucleus where it functions to regulate transcription and splicing of its mRNA targets. TDP-43 is also involved in mRNA transport and translation, though its cytoplasmic localization is typically minimal. In ALS the abnormal nuclear accumulation of CHMP7 is sufficient to initiate a reduction of Nups from the NPC leading to their subsequent degradation via the proteasome and lysosome. This collective reduction of multiple Nups from the neuronal NPC impacts functional nucleocytoplasmic transport (dashed arrows) which in turn, at least in part, contributes to nuclear loss of TDP-43 function and localization. Loss of nuclear TDP-43 localization and function impacts expression and splicing of target RNAs potentially contributing to loss of function for their associated proteins. We note that the majority of studies to date have been largely descriptive and thus, the molecular mechanisms that give rise to Nup, NPC, NTR, and nuclear envelope alterations in disease remain largely unknown. Nonetheless, defects in nucleocytoplasmic transport (dashed arrows), nuclear mRNA accumulation (presumably through impaired RNA export), and cytoplasmic Nup, NTR, and protein aggregation have been documented in models of ALS, FTD, and HD. Additionally, in Tau-based FTD models, nuclear envelope invaginations and perinuclear Nup – Tau co-aggregations have been observed. In HD, intranuclear accumulations comprised of mutant Htt protein and Nups or NTRs have been reported. Figure created with BioRender.
It is reasonable to hypothesize that this pathologic event compromises multiple functions of the NPC, given that these Nups span multiple subcomplexes of the NPC. However, this phenomenon has yet to be studied in detail and it is unclear specifically how reduction of each of these individual Nups impacts neuronal function and disease pathophysiology. Intriguingly, genetic variants in Nup50 have recently been identified as a risk factor for sALS [116]. While some of these variants result in a truncated protein and elicit a reduction in Nup50 protein levels, others are postulated to impact binding to Importin α or Nup153 based on their location within the Nup50 protein sequence. Thus, it is hypothesized that loss of Nup50 function is a significant contributor to neuronal death in ALS. Indeed, Megat and colleagues demonstrated that knockdown of Nup50 is sufficient to elicit locomotor dysfunction, neurodegeneration, and reduced cellular survival in multiple cellular and in vivo model systems [116]. Collectively, these studies clearly demonstrate a significant contribution of NPC injury to disease pathophysiology and importantly restoring POM121 expression was shown to be neuroprotective in human neurons [37] highlighting the potential therapeutic benefit of targeting NPC injury events in neurodegeneration.
The cytoskeleton and nuclear pore complexes and nucleocytoplasmic transport in ALS and FTD
Mutations in Profilin 1 (PFN1) and the microtubule associated protein Tau (MAPT, Tau), proteins associated with the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton respectively, have been identified in a subset of ALS and FTD cases [117, 118]. Moreover, about 45% of FTD cases are characterized by aggregation of wildtype Tau [84, 119]. Cytoskeletal integrity plays a pivotal role in maintaining positioning, stability, and integrity of the nucleus via connections with the LINC complex [120–125]. Thus, pathologic alterations to the cytoskeleton are likely to detrimentally impact nuclear integrity and stability. Indeed, ALS associated mutations in PFN1 can impact actin assembly dynamics [126, 127]. In addition, expression of PFN1 mutants in primary rodent neurons resulted in the mislocalization of Nups and NTRs as well as impaired functional nuclear import and abnormal nuclear envelope structure. Importantly, pharmacological modulation of actin polymerization was sufficient to restore nuclear import in both PFN1 and C9orf72 ALS/FTD models of disease [41] supporting a role for actin dynamics in the maintenance of NPC function and integrity. Furthermore, Tau deposition results in abnormal microtubule dynamics that deform the nuclear membrane causing nuclear envelope invaginations [128]. Interestingly, these nuclear lamina invaginations are highly reminiscent of those observed in laminopathies, a group of diseases caused by mutations in genes related to the nuclear lamina such as LMNA, LMNB1, and LMNB2 or nuclear envelope such as EMD, LAP2, LBR, and SYNE-1 [129–135], suggesting that nuclear maintenance of nuclear membrane integrity is critical for cellular function and survival. Morphological changes in the nuclear envelope and alterations to the NPC and NCT have also been reported during aging [65, 136–140]. As such, it is hypothesized that age-related neurodegenerative disease pathologies are the result of “accelerated” aging phenomenon. However, this has not yet been tested directly. Nonetheless, nuclear envelope invaginations impact nuclear lamina structure and impact gene expression and mRNA export in Drosophila models of tauopathy [141–143]. Moreover, pathologic phosphorylated Tau co-aggregates with Nup98 in the perinuclear space and FTD-associated mutant Tau impairs nuclear import in mice and human neurons [38, 128]. Interestingly, reduction of Nup98 restores the subcellular distribution of Ran GTPase [38] suggesting that Tau-mediated Nup98 aggregation may directly impact NCT capacity in FTD. Collectively, these studies demonstrate a central role of cytoskeletal disruptions as a contributor to impaired NCT and Nup and NTR mislocalization in ALS and FTD.
Huntington’s Disease
Trinucleotide CAG repeat expansions of greater than 40 repeats in the first exon of the huntingtin (HTT) gene are causative of the autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder Huntington’s Disease (HD) that results in degeneration of striatal medium spiny neurons to give rise to choreiform movement and dementia. Interestingly, longer expansion lengths have been associated with increased disease severity and earlier onset [144, 145]. While much of the research efforts detailed below have focused on pathologic PolyQ proteins, it is noted that CAG repeats can undergo non-canonical translation to produce a multitude of pathologic protein species including PolyA, PolyS, PolyL, and PolyC which have also been demonstrated to accumulate in human brain [146]. Highly aggregation-prone PolyQ proteins form inclusions in the striatum and cortex and can sequester a number of proteins including Nups and NTRs [43, 146–148]. In mice, iPSNs, and postmortem human brain tissue, mutant huntingtin (mHTT) co-aggregates with Nup62, Nup88, Gle1, and RanGAP1 and causes nuclear envelope abnormalities, altered subcellular distribution of Ran GTPase, nuclear mRNA accumulation and deficiencies in active nucleocytoplasmic transport [43, 148–150]. Notably, overexpression of Ran GTPase prevented HTT-induced neurodegeneration in Drosophila [150] demonstrating a role for NCT capacity in mediating disease pathophysiology in HD.
The ESCRT pathway and its relationship to neurodegenerative disease
The Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport (ESCRT) pathway is involved in the sorting, trafficking, and degradation of various proteins, lipids, and membrane-bound vesicles. The ESCRT pathway is conserved among eukaryotes, from yeast to humans and broadly functions in membrane remodeling events and is crucial for various cellular processes such as cytokinesis, virus budding, multivesicular body (MVB) biogenesis, autophagy and endo-lysosomal degradation, and more recently, nuclear pore assembly surveillance [151–153]. The ESCRT pathway is composed of five distinct protein complexes: ESCRT-0, ESCRT-I, ESCRT-II, ESCRT-III, and the Vps4 complex, which function together in a stepwise manner. Briefly as it relates to protein degradation, ESCRT-0 helps sort ubiquitinated cargo and initiates MVB formation. ESCRT-0 recruits ESCRT-I, which in turn recruits ESCRT-II to form a larger complex on the endosomal membrane. This complex recruits ESCRT-III in order to facilitate the recruitment of the AAA ATPase VPS4 and the final membrane scission event. VPS4 then catalyzes the disassembly of the ESCRT-III complex, allowing the ESCRT-III proteins to be recycled and proteins contained within MVBs and endosomes to be degraded via the lysosome [151–154].
Defects in the endo-lysosomal protein degradation pathway are associated with the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative diseases [155–157]. Given the involvement of ESCRT proteins in this pathway, loss of function of ESCRTs can lead to toxic accumulation of cargo in cells, causing stress and ultimately neuronal death. For example, forebrain-specific ablation of ESCRT-0 induces hippocampal neuronal cell loss accompanied by the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, including α-synuclein and huntingtin [158]. Moreover, mutations in the ESCRT-III protein CHMP2B have been identified in FTD and a lower motor neuron predominant form of ALS [159–164]. CHMP2B is an integral component of the ESCRT machinery, enabling scission in MVB formation and sorting ubiquitinated cargo for endosomal-lysosomal trafficking. Studies have shown that expression of mutant CHMP2B leads to cell death progressive neurodegeneration in mice [165]. Although early overexpression-based studies suggest that disease-associated CHMP2B mutations disrupt endo-lysosomal trafficking and autophagic degradation [159, 161, 164, 166], the pathophysiological cellular disruptions resulting from endogenous levels of mutant CHMP2B expression remain largely unknown. Interestingly, CHMP2B has recently been demonstrated to regulate the phosphorylation of TDP-43 via CK1. Moreover, knockdown of CHMP2B prevented toxicity associated with TDP-43 overexpression in both Drosophila and mammalian cell models [167]. This observation may challenge initial documentation that TDP-43 pathology is not a defining feature of CHMP2B FTD [159, 160, 163, 168, 169]. Thus, exploring the relationship between CHMP2B, TDP-43, and the ESCRT machinery may provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of FTD pathogenesis.
The ESCRT-III pathway and NPC and nuclear envelope surveillance
Recently, a role for the ESCRT pathway in nuclear envelope and NPC surveillance has been identified during cell division and NPC assembly and insertion into the nuclear membrane [170–177]. As it relates to NPC surveillance, ESCRT-III and VPS4 function to prevent aberrant NPC assembly, which can lead to the formation of a previously undiscovered quality control compartment termed Storage of Improperly assembled Nuclear pore Complexes (SINC) within the nuclear envelope in yeast. In the SINC, defective NPC assembly intermediates are recognized and cleared through a surveillance pathway that involves the ESCRT-III protein Chm7, inner nuclear membrane LEM family proteins Heh2/Heh1 and potentially upstream factors in the ubiquitin-proteasome system in yeast. Chm7 and Vps4 are recruited to the NPC assembly site through direct interactions with Heh2/Heh1 and there are multiple potential models for how they act to remove aberrant NPC assembly intermediates. In one model, Vps4 plays a role in stripping ESCRT-III from the membrane in a complex with Nups. In the second model, NPC assembly intermediates might be cleared through a vesicular intermediate in the nuclear envelope lumen, similar to the mechanism employed by ESCRT-III in multivesicular body biogenesis [170–172]. Moreover, upon nuclear envelope breakdown or rupture, the mammalian homolog of Chm7, CHMP7, binds to the inner nuclear membrane protein to LEMD2. This event facilitates CHMP7 polymerization which ultimately initiates a cascade of molecular events culminating in VPS4-mediated resealing of the nuclear envelope [173, 174, 178]. Collectively, these findings suggest that the ESCRT machinery plays a critical role in removing aberrant NPC biogenesis intermediates during NPC assembly and insertion and resealing of nuclear envelopes during cell division. However, whether these mechanisms relate to postmitotic NPC and nuclear envelope maintenance remains understudied.
Recent work in sALS and C9orf72 ALS/FTD iPSNs and postmortem human CNS tissues has identified a critical and pivotal role for aberrant nuclear accumulation of CHMP7 in initiating and facilitating NPC injury events including the reduction of specific Nups from neuronal nuclei and NPCs [36]. Under basal cellular conditions, CHMP7 passively diffuses in the nucleus and is actively exported by the NTR CRM1/XPO1 [170, 179] thereby maintaining low nuclear levels of CHMP7. In sALS and C9orf72 ALS/FTD human neurons, CHMP7 is aberrantly accumulated or retained, a pathological phenomenon that is sufficient to initiate a reduction in specific Nups from the human neuronal nucleus and NPC which in turn impacts functional NCT and the localization and function of TDP-43 [36]. In support of these studies, aberrant degradation of Nup214, Nup98, and Nup50 were prevented by the knockdown of Vps4 and additional ESCRT-III pathway proteins including CHMP2B and CHMP4B in a Drosophila model of C9orf72 ALS/FTD [180]. Additionally, knockdown of ESCRT proteins prevented amyloid precursor protein (APP)-mediated neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of AD [181], and overexpression of ECSRT proteins protected cellular models from the detrimental impacts of Tau aggregation [182].
Interestingly the Nups targeted in Drosophila and human models of C9orf72 ALS/FTD are distinct [37, 180] and importantly, flies do not have gene encoding POM121 which has previously been demonstrated to be an essential component of human NPC injury events [37]. Moreover, pathological alterations in CHMP2B and CHMP4B have not been observed in human C9orf72 ALS/FTD and sALS neuronal nuclei [183] underscoring critical differences between Drosophila models and authentic human disease. Nonetheless, these studies collectively highlight the ESCRT-III mediated nuclear surveillance as an important contributor to disease pathogenesis. Intriguingly, antisense oligonucleotide (ASO)-mediated knockdown of CHMP7 following the emergence of NPC injury was sufficient to restore the nuclear and NPC localization and expression of Nups and prevent TDP-43 dysfunction and mislocalization in sALS and C9orf72 ALS/FTD iPSNs [36] highlighting the therapeutic targetability of ESCRT-III proteins for the alleviation of pathophysiologic cascades in ALS.
Conclusions and Perspectives
Nup, NTR, and nuclear envelope abnormalities (Table 1, Figure 1) are now widely regarded as a prominent pathologic hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases. However, although a critical and necessary first step, studies to date have remained largely descriptive. Thus, although likely to have wide ranging implications for neuronal function including impaired nucleocytoplasmic transport, RNA binding protein mislocalization and aggregation, and potentially more global dysregulation of gene, RNA, and protein expression and localization, the precise pathophysiological impacts of Nup and NTR alterations and their individual contributions to disease pathophysiology remain largely unknown. Additionally, the molecular mechanisms that lead to documented Nup, NTR, and nuclear envelope pathologies in neurodegenerative disease are unclear at this time.
Recent work has highlighted the ESCRT-III nuclear surveillance pathway as a significant contributor to NPC injury events in ALS. Importantly, therapeutic targeting of aberrant ECSRT-III nuclear surveillance events alleviates pathogenic cascades in ALS iPSNs. Thus, these studies highlight NPC injury events and the proteins that mediate these events as potential therapeutic targets for neurodegenerative disease. However, as discussed throughout this review, a number of unanswered questions remain. What is the precise functional contribution of each Nup and NTR abnormality to pathophysiologic events in disease and how are these similar and different in cell type specific neurodegenerative diseases? What is the mechanistic and/or pathologic link between nuclear Nup reduction and Nup and NTR aggregation or do these represent independent events that could provide multiple opportunities for therapeutic intervention? What are the molecular mechanisms that lead to Nup and NTR dysfunction in cell type specific neurodegenerative diseases and in particular sporadic forms of disease? What is the utility of different model systems (e.g. endogenous vs overexpression, neuronal cells vs non-neuronal cells, human vs mouse vs flies) for replicating authentic human disease pathologies? Future studies aimed at answering these and additional questions will be essential for understanding the widespread contribution of NPC and NE injury to neurodegeneration and the identification of novel therapeutic targets for mitigating these events and their downstream consequences.
Acknowledgements
ANC is supported by funding from NIH NINDS/NIA (R00NS123242), The Robert Packard Center for ALS Research, BrightFocus Foundation, and Target ALS (IL-2023-C6-L4 and IL-2023-C5-L3).
Abbreviations
- NPC
nuclear pore complex
- Nups
nucleoporins
- FG
phenylalinine-glycine amino acids
- NCT
nucleocytoplasmic transport
- NTR
nuclear transport receptor
- NLS
nuclear localization sequence
- NES
nuclear export sequence
- ALS
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- fALS
familial Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- sALS
sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- FTD
Frontotemporal Dementia
- HD
Huntington’s Disease
- AD
Alzheimer’s Disease
- ESCRT
Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport
- HRE
hexanucleotide repeat expansion
- iPSC
induced pluripotent stem cell
- iPSN
induced pluripotent stem cell derived neuron
- DPR
dipeptide repeat protein
- MVB
multivesicular body
Footnotes
Declaration of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, Suprapto A, Karni-Schmidt O, Williams R, Chait BT, Sali A & Rout MP (2007) The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex, Nature. 450, 695–701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Beck M & Hurt E (2017) The nuclear pore complex: understanding its function through structural insight, Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 18, 73–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dickmanns A, Kehlenbach RH & Fahrenkrog B (2015) Nuclear Pore Complexes and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport: From Structure to Function to Disease, International review of cell and molecular biology. 320, 171–233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hampoelz B, Andres-Pons A, Kastritis P & Beck M (2019) Structure and Assembly of the Nuclear Pore Complex, Annual review of biophysics. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kabachinski G & Schwartz TU (2015) The nuclear pore complex--structure and function at a glance, Journal of cell science. 128, 423–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Knockenhauer KE & Schwartz TU (2016) The Nuclear Pore Complex as a Flexible and Dynamic Gate, Cell. 164, 1162–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lin DH & Hoelz A (2019) The Structure of the Nuclear Pore Complex (An Update), Annual review of biochemistry. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ribbeck K & Görlich D (2002) The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion, The EMBO journal. 21, 2664–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ghavami A, van der Giessen E & Onck PR (2016) Energetics of Transport through the Nuclear Pore Complex, PloS one. 11, e0148876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li C, Goryaynov A & Yang W (2016) The selective permeability barrier in the nuclear pore complex, Nucleus (Austin, Tex). 7, 430–446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mohr D, Frey S, Fischer T, Güttler T & Görlich D (2009) Characterisation of the passive permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes, The EMBO journal. 28, 2541–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Timney BL, Raveh B, Mironska R, Trivedi JM, Kim SJ, Russel D, Wente SR, Sali A & Rout MP (2016) Simple rules for passive diffusion through the nuclear pore complex, The Journal of cell biology. 215, 57–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schmidt HB & Gorlich D (2016) Transport Selectivity of Nuclear Pores, Phase Separation, and Membraneless Organelles, Trends in biochemical sciences. 41, 46–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Patel SS, Belmont BJ, Sante JM & Rexach MF (2007) Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex, Cell. 129, 83–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Popken P, Ghavami A, Onck PR, Poolman B & Veenhoff LM (2015) Size-dependent leak of soluble and membrane proteins through the yeast nuclear pore complex, Molecular biology of the cell. 26, 1386–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bischoff FR, Klebe C, Kretschmer J, Wittinghofer A & Ponstingl H (1994) RanGAP1 induces GTPase activity of nuclear Ras-related Ran, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 91, 2587–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Klebe C, Bischoff FR, Ponstingl H & Wittinghofer A (1995) Interaction of the nuclear GTP-binding protein Ran with its regulatory proteins RCC1 and RanGAP1, Biochemistry. 34, 639–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Melchior F, Guan T, Yokoyama N, Nishimoto T & Gerace L (1995) GTP hydrolysis by Ran occurs at the nuclear pore complex in an early step of protein import, The Journal of cell biology. 131, 571–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moore MS & Blobel G (1993) The GTP-binding protein Ran/TC4 is required for protein import into the nucleus, Nature. 365, 661–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Moroianu J & Blobel G (1995) Protein export from the nucleus requires the GTPase Ran and GTP hydrolysis, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 92, 4318–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Saitoh H, Cooke CA, Burgess WH, Earnshaw WC & Dasso M (1996) Direct and indirect association of the small GTPase ran with nuclear pore proteins and soluble transport factors: studies in Xenopus laevis egg extracts, Molecular biology of the cell. 7, 1319–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Paci G, Zheng T, Caria J, Zilman A & Lemke EA (2020) Molecular determinants of large cargo transport into the nucleus, eLife. 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sorokin AV, Kim ER & Ovchinnikov LP (2007) Nucleocytoplasmic transport of proteins, Biochemistry Biokhimiia. 72, 1439–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wing CE, Fung HYJ & Chook YM (2022) Karyopherin-mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport, Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 23, 307–328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Raices M & D’Angelo MA (2012) Nuclear pore complex composition: a new regulator of tissue-specific and developmental functions, Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 13, 687–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Baade I & Kehlenbach RH (2019) The cargo spectrum of nuclear transport receptors, Current opinion in cell biology. 58, 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cautain B, Hill R, de Pedro N & Link W (2015) Components and regulation of nuclear transport processes, The FEBS journal. 282, 445–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marfori M, Mynott A, Ellis JJ, Mehdi AM, Saunders NF, Curmi PM, Forwood JK, Boden M & Kobe B (2011) Molecular basis for specificity of nuclear import and prediction of nuclear localization, Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1813, 1562–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Melchior F (2001) Ran GTPase cycle: oOne mechanism -- two functions, Current biology : CB. 11, R257–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sloan KE, Gleizes PE & Bohnsack MT (2016) Nucleocytoplasmic Transport of RNAs and RNA-Protein Complexes, Journal of molecular biology. 428, 2040–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mackmull MT, Klaus B, Heinze I, Chokkalingam M, Beyer A, Russell RB, Ori A & Beck M (2017) Landscape of nuclear transport receptor cargo specificity, Molecular systems biology. 13, 962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Coyne AN & Rothstein JD (2022) Nuclear pore complexes - a doorway to neural injury in neurodegeneration, Nature reviews Neurology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen-Plotkin AS, Lee VM & Trojanowski JQ (2010) TAR DNA-binding protein 43 in neurodegenerative disease, Nature reviews Neurology. 6, 211–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Neumann M, Sampathu DM, Kwong LK, Truax AC, Micsenyi MC, Chou TT, Bruce J, Schuck T, Grossman M, Clark CM, McCluskey LF, Miller BL, Masliah E, Mackenzie IR, Feldman H, Feiden W, Kretzschmar HA, Trojanowski JQ & Lee VM (2006) Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Science (New York, NY). 314, 130–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chou CC, Zhang Y, Umoh ME, Vaughan SW, Lorenzini I, Liu F, Sayegh M, Donlin-Asp PG, Chen YH, Duong DM, Seyfried NT, Powers MA, Kukar T, Hales CM, Gearing M, Cairns NJ, Boylan KB, Dickson DW, Rademakers R, Zhang YJ, Petrucelli L, Sattler R, Zarnescu DC, Glass JD & Rossoll W (2018) TDP-43 pathology disrupts nuclear pore complexes and nucleocytoplasmic transport in ALS/FTD, Nature neuroscience. 21, 228–239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Coyne AN, Baskerville V, Zaepfel BL, Dickson DW, Rigo F, Bennett F, Lusk CP & Rothstein JD (2021) Nuclear accumulation of CHMP7 initiates nuclear pore complex injury and subsequent TDP-43 dysfunction in sporadic and familial ALS, Science translational medicine. 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Coyne AN, Zaepfel BL, Hayes L, Fitchman B, Salzberg Y, Luo EC, Bowen K, Trost H, Aigner S, Rigo F, Yeo GW, Harel A, Svendsen CN, Sareen D & Rothstein JD (2020) G(4)C(2) Repeat RNA Initiates a POM121-Mediated Reduction in Specific Nucleoporins in C9orf72 ALS/FTD, Neuron. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Eftekharzadeh B, Daigle JG, Kapinos LE, Coyne A, Schiantarelli J, Carlomagno Y, Cook C, Miller SJ, Dujardin S, Amaral AS, Grima JC, Bennett RE, Tepper K, DeTure M, Vanderburgh CR, Corjuc BT, DeVos SL, Gonzalez JA, Chew J, Vidensky S, Gage FH, Mertens J, Troncoso J, Mandelkow E, Salvatella X, Lim RYH, Petrucelli L, Wegmann S, Rothstein JD & Hyman BT (2018) Tau Protein Disrupts Nucleocytoplasmic Transport in Alzheimer’s Disease, Neuron. 99, 925–940.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Freibaum BD, Lu Y, Lopez-Gonzalez R, Kim NC, Almeida S, Lee KH, Badders N, Valentine M, Miller BL, Wong PC, Petrucelli L, Kim HJ, Gao FB & Taylor JP (2015) GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9orf72 compromises nucleocytoplasmic transport, Nature. 525, 129–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gasset-Rosa F, Lu S, Yu H, Chen C, Melamed Z, Guo L, Shorter J, Da Cruz S & Cleveland DW (2019) Cytoplasmic TDP-43 De-mixing Independent of Stress Granules Drives Inhibition of Nuclear Import, Loss of Nuclear TDP-43, and Cell Death, Neuron. 102, 339–357.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Giampetruzzi A, Danielson EW, Gumina V, Jeon M, Boopathy S, Brown RH, Ratti A, Landers JE & Fallini C (2019) Modulation of actin polymerization affects nucleocytoplasmic transport in multiple forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Nature communications. 10, 3827. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gleixner AM, Verdone BM, Otte CG, Anderson EN, Ramesh N, Shapiro OR, Gale JR, Mauna JC, Mann JR, Copley KE, Daley EL, Ortega JA, Cicardi ME, Kiskinis E, Kofler J, Pandey UB, Trotti D & Donnelly CJ (2022) NUP62 localizes to ALS/FTLD pathological assemblies and contributes to TDP-43 insolubility, Nature communications. 13, 3380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Grima JC, Daigle JG, Arbez N, Cunningham KC, Zhang K, Ochaba J, Geater C, Morozko E, Stocksdale J, Glatzer JC, Pham JT, Ahmed I, Peng Q, Wadhwa H, Pletnikova O, Troncoso JC, Duan W, Snyder SH, Ranum LP, Thompson LM, Lloyd TE, Ross CA & Rothstein JD (2017) Mutant Huntingtin Disrupts the Nuclear Pore Complex, Neuron. 94, 93–107.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hayes LR, Duan L, Bowen K, Kalab P & Rothstein JD (2020) C9orf72 arginine-rich dipeptide repeat proteins disrupt karyopherin-mediated nuclear import, eLife. 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jovicic A, Mertens J, Boeynaems S, Bogaert E, Chai N, Yamada SB, Paul JW 3rd, Sun S, Herdy JR, Bieri G, Kramer NJ, Gage FH, Van Den Bosch L, Robberecht W & Gitler AD (2015) Modifiers of C9orf72 dipeptide repeat toxicity connect nucleocytoplasmic transport defects to FTD/ALS, Nature neuroscience. 18, 1226–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang K, Donnelly CJ, Haeusler AR, Grima JC, Machamer JB, Steinwald P, Daley EL, Miller SJ, Cunningham KM, Vidensky S, Gupta S, Thomas MA, Hong I, Chiu SL, Huganir RL, Ostrow LW, Matunis MJ, Wang J, Sattler R, Lloyd TE & Rothstein JD (2015) The C9orf72 repeat expansion disrupts nucleocytoplasmic transport, Nature. 525, 56–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pasha T, Zatorska A, Sharipov D, Rogelj B, Hortobágyi T & Hirth F (2021) Karyopherin abnormalities in neurodegenerative proteinopathies, Brain : a journal of neurology. 144, 2915–2932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lin YC, Kumar MS, Ramesh N, Anderson EN, Nguyen AT, Kim B, Cheung S, McDonough JA, Skarnes WC, Lopez-Gonzalez R, Landers JE, Fawzi NL, Mackenzie IRA, Lee EB, Nickerson JA, Grunwald D, Pandey UB & Bosco DA (2021) Interactions between ALS-linked FUS and nucleoporins are associated with defects in the nucleocytoplasmic transport pathway, Nature neuroscience. 24, 1077–1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Otsuka S & Ellenberg J (2018) Mechanisms of nuclear pore complex assembly - two different ways of building one molecular machine, FEBS letters. 592, 475–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Antonin W, Ellenberg J & Dultz E (2008) Nuclear pore complex assembly through the cell cycle: regulation and membrane organization, FEBS letters. 582, 2004–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dultz E & Ellenberg J (2010) Live imaging of single nuclear pores reveals unique assembly kinetics and mechanism in interphase, The Journal of cell biology. 191, 15–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Dultz E, Zanin E, Wurzenberger C, Braun M, Rabut G, Sironi L & Ellenberg J (2008) Systematic kinetic analysis of mitotic dis- and reassembly of the nuclear pore in living cells, The Journal of cell biology. 180, 857–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hamed M & Antonin W (2021) Dunking into the Lipid Bilayer: How Direct Membrane Binding of Nucleoporins Can Contribute to Nuclear Pore Complex Structure and Assembly, Cells. 10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Antonin W, Franz C, Haselmann U, Antony C & Mattaj IW (2005) The integral membrane nucleoporin pom121 functionally links nuclear pore complex assembly and nuclear envelope formation, Molecular cell. 17, 83–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Funakoshi T, Clever M, Watanabe A & Imamoto N (2011) Localization of Pom121 to the inner nuclear membrane is required for an early step of interphase nuclear pore complex assembly, Molecular biology of the cell. 22, 1058–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mitchell JM, Mansfeld J, Capitanio J, Kutay U & Wozniak RW (2010) Pom121 links two essential subcomplexes of the nuclear pore complex core to the membrane, The Journal of cell biology. 191, 505–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Otsuka S, Bui KH, Schorb M, Hossain MJ, Politi AZ, Koch B, Eltsov M, Beck M & Ellenberg J (2016) Nuclear pore assembly proceeds by an inside-out extrusion of the nuclear envelope, eLife. 5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Otsuka S, Tempkin JOB, Zhang W, Politi AZ, Rybina A, Hossain MJ, Kueblbeck M, Callegari A, Koch B, Morero NR, Sali A & Ellenberg J (2023) A quantitative map of nuclear pore assembly reveals two distinct mechanisms, Nature. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Laurell E, Beck K, Krupina K, Theerthagiri G, Bodenmiller B, Horvath P, Aebersold R, Antonin W & Kutay U (2011) Phosphorylation of Nup98 by multiple kinases is crucial for NPC disassembly during mitotic entry, Cell. 144, 539–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Franz C, Walczak R, Yavuz S, Santarella R, Gentzel M, Askjaer P, Galy V, Hetzer M, Mattaj IW & Antonin W (2007) MEL-28/ELYS is required for the recruitment of nucleoporins to chromatin and postmitotic nuclear pore complex assembly, EMBO reports. 8, 165–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Allegretti M, Zimmerli CE, Rantos V, Wilfling F, Ronchi P, Fung HKH, Lee CW, Hagen W, Turoňová B, Karius K, Börmel M, Zhang X, Müller CW, Schwab Y, Mahamid J, Pfander B, Kosinski J & Beck M (2020) In-cell architecture of the nuclear pore and snapshots of its turnover, Nature. 586, 796–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lee CW, Wilfling F, Ronchi P, Allegretti M, Mosalaganti S, Jentsch S, Beck M & Pfander B (2020) Selective autophagy degrades nuclear pore complexes, Nature cell biology. 22, 159–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Li Z & Nakatogawa H (2022) Degradation of nuclear components via different autophagy pathways, Trends in cell biology. 32, 574–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mannino PJ & Lusk CP (2022) Quality control mechanisms that protect nuclear envelope identity and function, The Journal of cell biology. 221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.D’Angelo MA, Raices M, Panowski SH & Hetzer MW (2009) Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore complexes causes a loss of nuclear integrity in postmitotic cells, Cell. 136, 284–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Savas JN, Toyama BH, Xu T, Yates JR 3rd & Hetzer MW (2012) Extremely long-lived nuclear pore proteins in the rat brain, Science (New York, NY). 335, 942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Toyama BH, Arrojo EDR, Lev-Ram V, Ramachandra R, Deerinck TJ, Lechene C, Ellisman MH & Hetzer MW (2018) Visualization of long-lived proteins reveals age mosaicism within nuclei of postmitotic cells, The Journal of cell biology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Toyama BH, Savas JN, Park SK, Harris MS, Ingolia NT, Yates JR & Hetzer MW (2013) Identification of long-lived proteins reveals exceptional stability of essential cellular structures, Cell. 154, 971–982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Rempel IL, Steen A & Veenhoff LM (2020) Poor old pores - The challenge of making and maintaining nuclear pore complexes in aging, The FEBS journal. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Rempel IL, Crane MM, Thaller DJ, Mishra A, Jansen DP, Janssens G, Popken P, Akşit A, Kaeberlein M, van der Giessen E, Steen A, Onck PR, Lusk CP & Veenhoff LM (2019) Age-dependent deterioration of nuclear pore assembly in mitotic cells decreases transport dynamics, eLife. 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Masrori P & Van Damme P (2020) Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a clinical review, Eur J Neurol. 27, 1918–1929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Vahsen BF, Gray E, Thompson AG, Ansorge O, Anthony DC, Cowley SA, Talbot K & Turner MR (2021) Non-neuronal cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - from pathogenesis to biomarkers, Nature reviews Neurology. 17, 333–348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Andersen PM & Al-Chalabi A (2011) Clinical genetics of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: what do we really know?, Nature reviews Neurology. 7, 603–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Ghasemi M & Brown RH Jr. (2018) Genetics of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Gregory JM, Fagegaltier D, Phatnani H & Harms MB (2020) Genetics of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Current Genetic Medicine Reports. 8, 121–131. [Google Scholar]
- 76.DeJesus-Hernandez M, Mackenzie IR, Boeve BF, Boxer AL, Baker M, Rutherford NJ, Nicholson AM, Finch NA, Flynn H, Adamson J, Kouri N, Wojtas A, Sengdy P, Hsiung GY, Karydas A, Seeley WW, Josephs KA, Coppola G, Geschwind DH, Wszolek ZK, Feldman H, Knopman DS, Petersen RC, Miller BL, Dickson DW, Boylan KB, Graff-Radford NR & Rademakers R (2011) Expanded GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in noncoding region of C9ORF72 causes chromosome 9p-linked FTD and ALS, Neuron. 72, 245–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Renton AE, Majounie E, Waite A, Simon-Sanchez J, Rollinson S, Gibbs JR, Schymick JC, Laaksovirta H, van Swieten JC, Myllykangas L, Kalimo H, Paetau A, Abramzon Y, Remes AM, Kaganovich A, Scholz SW, Duckworth J, Ding J, Harmer DW, Hernandez DG, Johnson JO, Mok K, Ryten M, Trabzuni D, Guerreiro RJ, Orrell RW, Neal J, Murray A, Pearson J, Jansen IE, Sondervan D, Seelaar H, Blake D, Young K, Halliwell N, Callister JB, Toulson G, Richardson A, Gerhard A, Snowden J, Mann D, Neary D, Nalls MA, Peuralinna T, Jansson L, Isoviita VM, Kaivorinne AL, Holtta-Vuori M, Ikonen E, Sulkava R, Benatar M, Wuu J, Chio A, Restagno G, Borghero G, Sabatelli M, Heckerman D, Rogaeva E, Zinman L, Rothstein JD, Sendtner M, Drepper C, Eichler EE, Alkan C, Abdullaev Z, Pack SD, Dutra A, Pak E, Hardy J, Singleton A, Williams NM, Heutink P, Pickering-Brown S, Morris HR, Tienari PJ & Traynor BJ (2011) A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD, Neuron. 72, 257–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Balendra R & Isaacs AM (2018) C9orf72-mediated ALS and FTD: multiple pathways to disease, Nature reviews Neurology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Ferrari R, Kapogiannis D, Huey ED & Momeni P (2011) FTD and ALS: a tale of two diseases, Current Alzheimer research. 8, 273–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Olszewska DA, Lonergan R, Fallon EM & Lynch T (2016) Genetics of Frontotemporal Dementia, Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 16, 107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Orr HT (2011) FTD and ALS: genetic ties that bind, Neuron. 72, 189–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Wheaton MW, Salamone AR, Mosnik DM, McDonald RO, Appel SH, Schmolck HI, Ringholz GM & Schulz PE (2007) Cognitive impairment in familial ALS, Neurology. 69, 1411–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ringholz GM & Greene SR (2006) The relationship between amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, Current neurology and neuroscience reports. 6, 387–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ling SC, Polymenidou M & Cleveland DW (2013) Converging mechanisms in ALS and FTD: disrupted RNA and protein homeostasis, Neuron. 79, 416–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Amador-Ortiz C, Lin WL, Ahmed Z, Personett D, Davies P, Duara R, Graff-Radford NR, Hutton ML & Dickson DW (2007) TDP-43 immunoreactivity in hippocampal sclerosis and Alzheimer’s disease, Annals of neurology. 61, 435–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Chang XL, Tan MS, Tan L & Yu JT (2016) The Role of TDP-43 in Alzheimer’s Disease, Molecular neurobiology. 53, 3349–3359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.DeTure MA & Dickson DW (2019) The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, Molecular neurodegeneration. 14, 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Bang J, Spina S & Miller BL (2015) Frontotemporal dementia, Lancet. 386, 1672–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Khosravi B, Hartmann H, May S, Mohl C, Ederle H, Michaelsen M, Schludi MH, Dormann D & Edbauer D (2016) Cytoplasmic poly-GA aggregates impair nuclear import of TDP-43 in C9orf72 ALS/FTLD, Human molecular genetics. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Shi KY, Mori E, Nizami ZF, Lin Y, Kato M, Xiang S, Wu LC, Ding M, Yu Y, Gall JG & McKnight SL (2017) Toxic PRn poly-dipeptides encoded by the C9orf72 repeat expansion block nuclear import and export, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114, E1111–e1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Solomon DA, Stepto A, Au WH, Adachi Y, Diaper DC, Hall R, Rekhi A, Boudi A, Tziortzouda P, Lee YB, Smith B, Bridi JC, Spinelli G, Dearlove J, Humphrey DM, Gallo JM, Troakes C, Fanto M, Soller M, Rogelj B, Parsons RB, Shaw CE, Hortobágyi T & Hirth F (2018) A feedback loop between dipeptide-repeat protein, TDP-43 and karyopherin-α mediates C9orf72-related neurodegeneration, Brain : a journal of neurology. 141, 2908–2924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Davidson YS, Barker H, Robinson AC, Thompson JC, Harris J, Troakes C, Smith B, Al-Saraj S, Shaw C, Rollinson S, Masuda-Suzukake M, Hasegawa M, Pickering-Brown S, Snowden JS & Mann DM (2014) Brain distribution of dipeptide repeat proteins in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neurone disease associated with expansions in C9ORF72, Acta neuropathologica communications. 2, 70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Gomez-Deza J, Lee YB, Troakes C, Nolan M, Al-Sarraj S, Gallo JM & Shaw CE (2015) Dipeptide repeat protein inclusions are rare in the spinal cord and almost absent from motor neurons in C9ORF72 mutant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and are unlikely to cause their degeneration, Acta neuropathologica communications. 3, 38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Mackenzie IR, Frick P & Neumann M (2014) The neuropathology associated with repeat expansions in the C9ORF72 gene, Acta neuropathologica. 127, 347–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mann DM, Rollinson S, Robinson A, Bennion Callister J, Thompson JC, Snowden JS, Gendron T, Petrucelli L, Masuda-Suzukake M, Hasegawa M, Davidson Y & Pickering-Brown S (2013) Dipeptide repeat proteins are present in the p62 positive inclusions in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neurone disease associated with expansions in C9ORF72, Acta neuropathologica communications. 1, 68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Vanneste J, Vercruysse T, Boeynaems S, Sicart A, Van Damme P, Daelemans D & Van Den Bosch L (2019) C9orf72-generated poly-GR and poly-PR do not directly interfere with nucleocytoplasmic transport, Scientific reports. 9, 15728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Morón-Oset J, Fischer LK, Carcolé M, Giblin A, Zhang P, Isaacs AM, Grönke S & Partridge L (2023) Toxicity of C9orf72-associated dipeptide repeat peptides is modified by commonly used protein tags, Life Sci Alliance. 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Aizawa H, Yamashita T, Kato H, Kimura T & Kwak S (2019) Impaired Nucleoporins Are Present in Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Motor Neurons that Exhibit Mislocalization of the 43-kDa TAR DNA-Binding Protein, J Clin Neurol. 15, 62–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Shang J, Yamashita T, Nakano Y, Morihara R, Li X, Feng T, Liu X, Huang Y, Fukui Y, Hishikawa N, Ohta Y & Abe K (2017) Aberrant distributions of nuclear pore complex proteins in ALS mice and ALS patients, Neuroscience. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Kinoshita Y, Ito H, Hirano A, Fujita K, Wate R, Nakamura M, Kaneko S, Nakano S & Kusaka H (2009) Nuclear contour irregularity and abnormal transporter protein distribution in anterior horn cells in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology. 68, 1184–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Nishimura AL, Zupunski V, Troakes C, Kathe C, Fratta P, Howell M, Gallo JM, Hortobágyi T, Shaw CE & Rogelj B (2010) Nuclear import impairment causes cytoplasmic trans-activation response DNA-binding protein accumulation and is associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration, Brain : a journal of neurology. 133, 1763–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Khalil B, Chhangani D, Wren MC, Smith CL, Lee JH, Li X, Puttinger C, Tsai CW, Fortin G, Morderer D, Gao J, Liu F, Lim CK, Chen J, Chou CC, Croft CL, Gleixner AM, Donnelly CJ, Golde TE, Petrucelli L, Oskarsson B, Dickson DW, Zhang K, Shorter J, Yoshimura SH, Barmada SJ, Rincon-Limas DE & Rossoll W (2022) Nuclear import receptors are recruited by FG-nucleoporins to rescue hallmarks of TDP-43 proteinopathy, Molecular neurodegeneration. 17, 80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Kwiatkowski TJ Jr., Bosco DA, Leclerc AL, Tamrazian E, Vanderburg CR, Russ C, Davis A, Gilchrist J, Kasarskis EJ, Munsat T, Valdmanis P, Rouleau GA, Hosler BA, Cortelli P, de Jong PJ, Yoshinaga Y, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, Yan J, Ticozzi N, Siddique T, McKenna-Yasek D, Sapp PC, Horvitz HR, Landers JE & Brown RH Jr. (2009) Mutations in the FUS/TLS gene on chromosome 16 cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Science (New York, NY). 323, 1205–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Sreedharan J, Blair IP, Tripathi VB, Hu X, Vance C, Rogelj B, Ackerley S, Durnall JC, Williams KL, Buratti E, Baralle F, de Belleroche J, Mitchell JD, Leigh PN, Al-Chalabi A, Miller CC, Nicholson G & Shaw CE (2008) TDP-43 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Science (New York, NY). 319, 1668–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Ramaswami M, Taylor JP & Parker R (2013) Altered ribostasis: RNA-protein granules in degenerative disorders, Cell. 154, 727–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Kumar MS, Stallworth KM, Murthy AC, Lim SM, Li N, Jain A, Munro JB, Fawzi NL, Lagier-Tourenne C & Bosco DA (2023) Interactions between FUS and the C-terminal Domain of Nup62 are Sufficient for their Co-phase Separation into Amorphous Assemblies, Journal of molecular biology. 435, 167972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Guo L, Kim HJ, Wang H, Monaghan J, Freyermuth F, Sung JC, O’Donovan K, Fare CM, Diaz Z, Singh N, Zhang ZC, Coughlin M, Sweeny EA, DeSantis ME, Jackrel ME, Rodell CB, Burdick JA, King OD, Gitler AD, Lagier-Tourenne C, Pandey UB, Chook YM, Taylor JP & Shorter J (2018) Nuclear-Import Receptors Reverse Aberrant Phase Transitions of RNA-Binding Proteins with Prion-like Domains, Cell. 173, 677–692.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Hofweber M, Hutten S, Bourgeois B, Spreitzer E, Niedner-Boblenz A, Schifferer M, Ruepp MD, Simons M, Niessing D, Madl T & Dormann D (2018) Phase Separation of FUS Is Suppressed by Its Nuclear Import Receptor and Arginine Methylation, Cell. 173, 706–719.e13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Yoshizawa T, Ali R, Jiou J, Fung HYJ, Burke KA, Kim SJ, Lin Y, Peeples WB, Saltzberg D, Soniat M, Baumhardt JM, Oldenbourg R, Sali A, Fawzi NL, Rosen MK & Chook YM (2018) Nuclear Import Receptor Inhibits Phase Separation of FUS through Binding to Multiple Sites, Cell. 173, 693–705.e22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Hutten S, Usluer S, Bourgeois B, Simonetti F, Odeh HM, Fare CM, Czuppa M, Hruska-Plochan M, Hofweber M, Polymenidou M, Shorter J, Edbauer D, Madl T & Dormann D (2020) Nuclear Import Receptors Directly Bind to Arginine-Rich Dipeptide Repeat Proteins and Suppress Their Pathological Interactions, Cell reports. 33, 108538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Woerner AC, Frottin F, Hornburg D, Feng LR, Meissner F, Patra M, Tatzelt J, Mann M, Winklhofer KF, Hartl FU & Hipp MS (2016) Cytoplasmic protein aggregates interfere with nucleocytoplasmic transport of protein and RNA, Science (New York, NY). 351, 173–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Daigle N, Beaudouin J, Hartnell L, Imreh G, Hallberg E, Lippincott-Schwartz J & Ellenberg J (2001) Nuclear pore complexes form immobile networks and have a very low turnover in live mammalian cells, The Journal of cell biology. 154, 71–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Hakhverdyan Z, Molloy KR, Keegan S, Herricks T, Lepore DM, Munson M, Subbotin RI, Fenyö D, Aitchison JD, Fernandez-Martinez J, Chait BT & Rout MP (2020) Dissecting the Structural Dynamics of the Nuclear Pore Complex, Molecular cell. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Yavuz S, Santarella-Mellwig R, Koch B, Jaedicke A, Mattaj IW & Antonin W (2010) NLS-mediated NPC functions of the nucleoporin Pom121, FEBS letters. 584, 3292–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Hamed M, Caspar B, Port SA & Kehlenbach RH (2021) A nuclear export sequence promotes CRM1-dependent targeting of the nucleoporin Nup214 to the nuclear pore complex, Journal of cell science. 134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Megat S, Mora N, Sanogo J, Roman O, Catanese A, Alami NO, Freischmidt A, Mingaj X, De Calbiac H, Muratet F, Dirrig-Grosch S, Dieterle S, Van Bakel N, Müller K, Sieverding K, Weishaupt J, Andersen PM, Weber M, Neuwirth C, Margelisch M, Sommacal A, Van Eijk KR, Veldink JH, Lautrette G, Couratier P, Camuzat A, Le Ber I, Grassano M, Chio A, Boeckers T, Ludolph AC, Roselli F, Yilmazer-Hanke D, Millecamps S, Kabashi E, Storkebaum E, Sellier C & Dupuis L (2023) Integrative genetic analysis illuminates ALS heritability and identifies risk genes, Nature communications. 14, 342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Wu CH, Fallini C, Ticozzi N, Keagle PJ, Sapp PC, Piotrowska K, Lowe P, Koppers M, McKenna-Yasek D, Baron DM, Kost JE, Gonzalez-Perez P, Fox AD, Adams J, Taroni F, Tiloca C, Leclerc AL, Chafe SC, Mangroo D, Moore MJ, Zitzewitz JA, Xu ZS, van den Berg LH, Glass JD, Siciliano G, Cirulli ET, Goldstein DB, Salachas F, Meininger V, Rossoll W, Ratti A, Gellera C, Bosco DA, Bassell GJ, Silani V, Drory VE, Brown RH Jr. & Landers JE (2012) Mutations in the profilin 1 gene cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Nature. 488, 499–503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Wilhelmsen KC, Clark LN, Miller BL & Geschwind DH (1999) Tau mutations in frontotemporal dementia, Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 10 Suppl 1, 88–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Lee VM, Goedert M & Trojanowski JQ (2001) Neurodegenerative tauopathies, Annual review of neuroscience. 24, 1121–59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Hatch EM & Hetzer MW (2016) Nuclear envelope rupture is induced by actin-based nucleus confinement, The Journal of cell biology. 215, 27–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Jahed Z, Soheilypour M, Peyro M & Mofrad MR (2016) The LINC and NPC relationship - it’s complicated!, Journal of cell science. 129, 3219–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Janota CS, Calero-Cuenca FJ & Gomes ER (2020) The role of the cell nucleus in mechanotransduction, Current opinion in cell biology. 63, 204–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Chang W, Worman HJ & Gundersen GG (2015) Accessorizing and anchoring the LINC complex for multifunctionality, The Journal of cell biology. 208, 11–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Horn HF (2014) LINC complex proteins in development and disease, Current topics in developmental biology. 109, 287–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Wong X, Loo TH & Stewart CL (2021) LINC complex regulation of genome organization and function, Current opinion in genetics & development. 67, 130–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Liu X, Pimm ML, Haarer B, Brawner AT & Henty-Ridilla JL (2022) Biochemical characterization of actin assembly mechanisms with ALS-associated profilin variants, European journal of cell biology. 101, 151212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Schmidt EJ, Funes S, McKeon JE, Morgan BR, Boopathy S, O’Connor LC, Bilsel O, Massi F, Jégou A & Bosco DA (2021) ALS-linked PFN1 variants exhibit loss and gain of functions in the context of formin-induced actin polymerization, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Paonessa F, Evans LD, Solanki R, Larrieu D, Wray S, Hardy J, Jackson SP & Livesey FJ (2019) Microtubules Deform the Nuclear Membrane and Disrupt Nucleocytoplasmic Transport in Tau-Mediated Frontotemporal Dementia, Cell reports. 26, 582–593.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.de Leeuw R, Gruenbaum Y & Medalia O (2018) Nuclear Lamins: Thin Filaments with Major Functions, Trends in cell biology. 28, 34–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Kang SM, Yoon MH & Park BJ (2018) Laminopathies; Mutations on single gene and various human genetic diseases, BMB Rep. 51, 327–337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Marcelot A, Worman HJ & Zinn-Justin S (2021) Protein structural and mechanistic basis of progeroid laminopathies, The FEBS journal. 288, 2757–2772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Stiekema M, van Zandvoort M, Ramaekers FCS & Broers JLV (2020) Structural and Mechanical Aberrations of the Nuclear Lamina in Disease, Cells. 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Worman HJ (2012) Nuclear lamins and laminopathies, J Pathol. 226, 316–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Dutta S, Bhattacharyya M & Sengupta K (2018) Changes in the Nuclear Envelope in Laminopathies, Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1112, 31–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Hah J & Kim DH (2019) Deciphering Nuclear Mechanobiology in Laminopathy, Cells. 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Hetzer MW (2010) The role of the nuclear pore complex in aging of post-mitotic cells, Aging. 2, 74–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Martins F, Sousa J, Pereira CD, da Cruz ESOAB & Rebelo S (2020) Nuclear envelope dysfunction and its contribution to the aging process, Aging Cell. 19, e13143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Robijns J, Houthaeve G, Braeckmans K & De Vos WH (2018) Loss of Nuclear Envelope Integrity in Aging and Disease, International review of cell and molecular biology. 336, 205–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Sakuma S & D’Angelo MA (2017) The roles of the nuclear pore complex in cellular dysfunction, aging and disease, Seminars in cell & developmental biology. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Scaffidi P & Misteli T (2006) Lamin A-dependent nuclear defects in human aging, Science (New York, NY). 312, 1059–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Cornelison GL, Levy SA, Jenson T & Frost B (2019) Tau-induced nuclear envelope invagination causes a toxic accumulation of mRNA in Drosophila, Aging Cell. 18, e12847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Frost B, Bardai FH & Feany MB (2016) Lamin Dysfunction Mediates Neurodegeneration in Tauopathies, Current biology : CB. 26, 129–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Frost B, Hemberg M, Lewis J & Feany MB (2014) Tau promotes neurodegeneration through global chromatin relaxation, Nature neuroscience. 17, 357–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.McColgan P & Tabrizi SJ (2018) Huntington’s disease: a clinical review, Eur J Neurol. 25, 24–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Ross CA & Tabrizi SJ (2011) Huntington’s disease: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical treatment, The Lancet Neurology. 10, 83–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Bañez-Coronel M, Ayhan F, Tarabochia AD, Zu T, Perez BA, Tusi SK, Pletnikova O, Borchelt DR, Ross CA, Margolis RL, Yachnis AT, Troncoso JC & Ranum LP (2015) RAN Translation in Huntington Disease, Neuron. 88, 667–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Suhr ST, Senut MC, Whitelegge JP, Faull KF, Cuizon DB & Gage FH (2001) Identities of sequestered proteins in aggregates from cells with induced polyglutamine expression, The Journal of cell biology. 153, 283–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Gasset-Rosa F, Chillon-Marinas C, Goginashvili A, Atwal RS, Artates JW, Tabet R, Wheeler VC, Bang AG, Cleveland DW & Lagier-Tourenne C (2017) Polyglutamine-Expanded Huntingtin Exacerbates Age-Related Disruption of Nuclear Integrity and Nucleocytoplasmic Transport, Neuron. 94, 48–57.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Hosp F, Vossfeldt H, Heinig M, Vasiljevic D, Arumughan A, Wyler E, Landthaler M, Hubner N, Wanker EE, Lannfelt L, Ingelsson M, Lalowski M, Voigt A & Selbach M (2015) Quantitative interaction proteomics of neurodegenerative disease proteins, Cell reports. 11, 1134–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Liu KY, Shyu YC, Barbaro BA, Lin YT, Chern Y, Thompson LM, James Shen CK & Marsh JL (2015) Disruption of the nuclear membrane by perinuclear inclusions of mutant huntingtin causes cell-cycle re-entry and striatal cell death in mouse and cell models of Huntington’s disease, Human molecular genetics. 24, 1602–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.McCullough J, Frost A & Sundquist WI (2018) Structures, Functions, and Dynamics of ESCRT-III/Vps4 Membrane Remodeling and Fission Complexes, Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 34, 85–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Vietri M, Radulovic M & Stenmark H (2019) The many functions of ESCRTs, Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Schmidt O & Teis D (2012) The ESCRT machinery, Current biology : CB. 22, R116–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Babst M (2005) A protein’s final ESCRT, Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark). 6, 2–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Giovedì S, Ravanelli MM, Parisi B, Bettegazzi B & Guarnieri FC (2020) Dysfunctional Autophagy and Endolysosomal System in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Relevance and Therapeutic Options, Frontiers in cellular neuroscience. 14, 602116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Malik BR, Maddison DC, Smith GA & Peters OM (2019) Autophagic and endo-lysosomal dysfunction in neurodegenerative disease, Mol Brain. 12, 100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Kaul Z & Chakrabarti O (2018) Endosomal sorting complexes required for ESCRTing cells toward death during neurogenesis, neurodevelopment and neurodegeneration, Traffic (Copenhagen, Denmark). 19, 485–495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Oshima R, Hasegawa T, Tamai K, Sugeno N, Yoshida S, Kobayashi J, Kikuchi A, Baba T, Futatsugi A, Sato I, Satoh K, Takeda A, Aoki M & Tanaka N (2016) ESCRT-0 dysfunction compromises autophagic degradation of protein aggregates and facilitates ER stress-mediated neurodegeneration via apoptotic and necroptotic pathways, Scientific reports. 6, 24997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Clayton EL, Mizielinska S, Edgar JR, Nielsen TT, Marshall S, Norona FE, Robbins M, Damirji H, Holm IE, Johannsen P, Nielsen JE, Asante EA, Collinge J & Isaacs AM (2015) Frontotemporal dementia caused by CHMP2B mutation is characterised by neuronal lysosomal storage pathology, Acta neuropathologica. 130, 511–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Cox LE, Ferraiuolo L, Goodall EF, Heath PR, Higginbottom A, Mortiboys H, Hollinger HC, Hartley JA, Brockington A, Burness CE, Morrison KE, Wharton SB, Grierson AJ, Ince PG, Kirby J & Shaw PJ (2010) Mutations in CHMP2B in lower motor neuron predominant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), PloS one. 5, e9872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Krasniak CS & Ahmad ST (2016) The role of CHMP2B(Intron5) in autophagy and frontotemporal dementia, Brain research. 1649, 151–157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Parkinson N, Ince PG, Smith MO, Highley R, Skibinski G, Andersen PM, Morrison KE, Pall HS, Hardiman O, Collinge J, Shaw PJ & Fisher EM (2006) ALS phenotypes with mutations in CHMP2B (charged multivesicular body protein 2B), Neurology. 67, 1074–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Roos P, Holm IE, Nielsen JE, Nielsen TT, Brown JM, Johannsen P & Isaacs AM (1993) CHMP2B Frontotemporal Dementia in GeneReviews(®) (Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K & Amemiya A, eds), University of Washington, Seattle Copyright © 1993–2020, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle. All rights reserved., Seattle (WA). [Google Scholar]
- 164.van der Zee J, Urwin H, Engelborghs S, Bruyland M, Vandenberghe R, Dermaut B, De Pooter T, Peeters K, Santens P, De Deyn PP, Fisher EM, Collinge J, Isaacs AM & Van Broeckhoven C (2008) CHMP2B C-truncating mutations in frontotemporal lobar degeneration are associated with an aberrant endosomal phenotype in vitro, Human molecular genetics. 17, 313–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Ghazi-Noori S, Froud KE, Mizielinska S, Powell C, Smidak M, Fernandez de Marco M, O’Malley C, Farmer M, Parkinson N, Fisher EM, Asante EA, Brandner S, Collinge J & Isaacs AM (2012) Progressive neuronal inclusion formation and axonal degeneration in CHMP2B mutant transgenic mice, Brain : a journal of neurology. 135, 819–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Urwin H, Authier A, Nielsen JE, Metcalf D, Powell C, Froud K, Malcolm DS, Holm I, Johannsen P, Brown J, Fisher EM, van der Zee J, Bruyland M, Van Broeckhoven C, Collinge J, Brandner S, Futter C & Isaacs AM (2010) Disruption of endocytic trafficking in frontotemporal dementia with CHMP2B mutations, Human molecular genetics. 19, 2228–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Deng X, Sun X, Yue W, Duan Y, Hu R, Zhang K, Ni J, Cui J, Wang Q, Chen Y, Li A & Fang Y (2022) CHMP2B regulates TDP-43 phosphorylation and cytotoxicity independent of autophagy via CK1, The Journal of cell biology. 221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Mackenzie IR, Rademakers R & Neumann M (2010) TDP-43 and FUS in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia, The Lancet Neurology. 9, 995–1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Ugbode C & West RJH (2021) Lessons learned from CHMP2B, implications for frontotemporal dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Neurobiology of disease. 147, 105144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Thaller DJ, Allegretti M, Borah S, Ronchi P, Beck M & Lusk CP (2019) An ESCRT-LEM protein surveillance system is poised to directly monitor the nuclear envelope and nuclear transport system, eLife. 8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Webster BM, Colombi P, Jager J & Lusk CP (2014) Surveillance of nuclear pore complex assembly by ESCRT-III/Vps4, Cell. 159, 388–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Webster BM, Thaller DJ, Jager J, Ochmann SE, Borah S & Lusk CP (2016) Chm7 and Heh1 collaborate to link nuclear pore complex quality control with nuclear envelope sealing, The EMBO journal. 35, 2447–2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Gu M, LaJoie D, Chen OS, von Appen A, Ladinsky MS, Redd MJ, Nikolova L, Bjorkman PJ, Sundquist WI, Ullman KS & Frost A (2017) LEM2 recruits CHMP7 for ESCRT-mediated nuclear envelope closure in fission yeast and human cells, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114, E2166–e2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Olmos Y, Perdrix-Rosell A & Carlton JG (2016) Membrane Binding by CHMP7 Coordinates ESCRT-III-Dependent Nuclear Envelope Reformation, Current biology : CB. 26, 2635–2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Penfield L, Shankar R, Szentgyörgyi E, Laffitte A, Mauro MS, Audhya A, Müller-Reichert T & Bahmanyar S (2020) Regulated lipid synthesis and LEM2/CHMP7 jointly control nuclear envelope closure, The Journal of cell biology. 219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Ventimiglia LN, Cuesta-Geijo MA, Martinelli N, Caballe A, Macheboeuf P, Miguet N, Parnham IM, Olmos Y, Carlton JG, Weissenhorn W & Martin-Serrano J (2018) CC2D1B Coordinates ESCRT-III Activity during the Mitotic Reformation of the Nuclear Envelope, Developmental cell. 47, 547–563.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Vietri M, Schink KO, Campsteijn C, Wegner CS, Schultz SW, Christ L, Thoresen SB, Brech A, Raiborg C & Stenmark H (2015) Spastin and ESCRT-III coordinate mitotic spindle disassembly and nuclear envelope sealing, Nature. 522, 231–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.von Appen A, LaJoie D, Johnson IE, Trnka MJ, Pick SM, Burlingame AL, Ullman KS & Frost A (2020) LEM2 phase separation promotes ESCRT-mediated nuclear envelope reformation, Nature. 582, 115–118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Vietri M, Schultz SW, Bellanger A, Jones CM, Petersen LI, Raiborg C, Skarpen E, Pedurupillay CRJ, Kjos I, Kip E, Timmer R, Jain A, Collas P, Knorr RL, Grellscheid SN, Kusumaatmaja H, Brech A, Micci F, Stenmark H & Campsteijn C (2020) Unrestrained ESCRT-III drives micronuclear catastrophe and chromosome fragmentation, Nature cell biology. 22, 856–867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Dubey SK, Maulding K, Sung H & Lloyd TE (2022) Nucleoporins are degraded via upregulation of ESCRT-III/Vps4 complex in Drosophila models of C9-ALS/FTD, Cell reports. 40, 111379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Zhuang L, Li C, Peng F, Xue E, Li W, Sun X, Chen P, Zhou Q & Xue L (2023) Depletion of ESCRT ameliorates APP-induced AD-like symptoms in Drosophila, J Cell Physiol. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Prissette M, Fury W, Koss M, Racioppi C, Fedorova D, Dragileva E, Clarke G, Pohl T, Dugan J, Ahrens D, Chiu J, Hunt C, Siao CJ, Young T, Bhowmick A, Rogulin V, Desclaux M, Hayden EY, Podgorski M, Gao M, Macdonald LE, Frendewey D, Yancopoulos GD & Zambrowicz B (2022) Disruption of nuclear envelope integrity as a possible initiating event in tauopathies, Cell reports. 40, 111249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Coyne AN & Rothstein JD (2021) The ESCRT-III protein VPS4, but not CHMP4B or CHMP2B, is pathologically increased in familial and sporadic ALS neuronal nuclei, Acta neuropathologica communications. 9, 127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
