Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 23;22(6):1983–2002. doi: 10.1007/s10237-023-01747-w

Table 1.

Simulation parameters used to study a hypertensive heart and reverse remodeling

Name Parameter Value
Geometry
Major epicardial radius aepi 55mm
Minor epicardial radius bepi 30mm
Major endocardial radius aendo 46mm
Minor endocardial radius bendo 19mm
Truncation c 13mm
Epicardial fiber helix angle ϕepi -60
Endocardial fiber helix angle ϕendo 60
Material parameters
Myocytes: Fung exponential parameters am 7.6J/kg
bm 11.4
Myocytes: Active muscle tone σactm 54kPa
λ0m 0.8
λmaxm 1.4
Collagen: Fung exponential parameters ac 568J/kg
bc 11.2
Elastin: Neo-Hookean parameter ae 72J/kg
Volumetric penalty κ 150kPa
Homeostatic stretches
Myocytes: Homeostatic stretch λhm 1.1
Collagen: Homeostatic stretch λhc 1.062
Boundary conditions
Base spring stiffness cbase 2.0kPa/mm
Pericardial spring stiffness cp 0.2kPa/mm
Baseline systolic blood pressure p 120mmHg
Stage 1 systolic blood pressure p 140mmHg
Stage 2 systolic blood pressure p 180mmHg
Initial conditions
Total initial reference mass density ρ0(s=0) 1050kg/m3
Initial myocyte mass fraction ξm(s=0) 0.6
Initial collagen mass fraction ξc(s=0) 0.1
Initial elastin mass fraction ξe(s=0) 0.3
Initial inelastic remodeling stretch λri(s=0) 1λhi
G&R parameters
Myocyte growth gain km 0.1/Tm
Myocyte sarcomere mean survival time Tm 10days
Collagen growth gain kc 0.1/Tc
Collagen mean survival time Tc 15days
Stability criteria
Homeostasis threshold ϵσ,h 10-3

The material parameters and homeostatic stretches are adopted from Braeu et al. (2016) who modeled vascular G&R. The mean survival time of sarcomeres is estimated from Willis et al. (2009). The stiffness of the pericardial boundary conditions is taken from Pfaller et al. (2019) and initial mass fractions are estimated from volume fractions in healthy myocardium (Holzapfel and Ogden 2009). The classification of hypertension is taken from Chobanian et al. (2003)