Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 28;6:1097. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05484-9

Table 1.

Comparisons between neonatal niche injection and blastocyst complementation, as well as fetal injection.

Neonatal niche injection (P1.5) Blastocyst complementation (E2.5)9 Fetal injection (Exo utero, E13.5)11
Second surgery Not required Embryo transfer to pseudopregnant mice Cesarean section and transfer to foster mothers
Host survival rate 85% (33 of 39)a 43% (34 of 79)b p < 0.0001c 74% (14 of 19)d p = 0.47c
Percentage of donor nephron engraftment in kidneys relative to surviving hosts 100% (33 of 33) 71% (24 of 34)e p < 0.0001c 14% (2 of 14) p < 0.0001c
Percentage of donor nephron engraftment in kidneys relative to all injected hosts 85% (33 of 39) 30% (24 of 79) p < 0.0001c 11% (2 of 19) p < 0.0001c

aHosts that survived 2 weeks after the surgery performed by the skilled experimenter.

bPercentage of pups that reached adulthood from embryos derived from intercrosses of Sall1+/− mice injected with embryonic stem cells.

cComparisons against neonatal niche injection using the Chi-square test.

dPercentage of fetuses that survived until cesarean section performed by the skilled experimenter. Note the subsequent risk of being killed by foster mothers.

ePercentage of adults derived from embryos injected with embryonic stem cells, exhibiting confirmed chimera formation.