Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 27;28:64. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.23-00177

Table 1.

Characteristics of researches included.

Study country Participants Cohort size Sex Age (years) Data acquisition Screen device reported Covariates Literature quality evaluation score

computer TV mobile device
Hakala
2006
Finland adolescents 6003 Male = 2665
Female = 3338
14∼18 Self-report Age, sex, school success, timing of puberty, stress symptoms 8
Torsheim
2010
Denmark adolescents
from Nordic countries
31022 NM 11,13,15 Self-report   Country, age, socioeconomic status, depression, school stress, physical activity 7
Shan
2013
China students 3016 Male = 1460
Female = 1556
15∼19 Self-report   Sex, grade, soreness after exercise, digital device use, sitting time after school and personal emotions 8
Brindova
2015
Slovak students 8042 Male = 3,910
Female = 4,132
11∼15 Self-report   Age, sex 7
Rossi
2016
Finland students 1637 Male = 772
Female = 865
14∼16 Self-report     Age, sex, BMI, chronic diseases, smoking 8
Noll
2016
Brazil students 1439 Male = 765
Female = 674
11∼16 Self-report   Age, sex 8
Silva
2017
Portugal students 969 Male = 467
Female = 502
13∼19 Self-report   Age, sex, BMI, physical activity, sleep quality 7
Bento
2020
Brazil students 1628 Male = 798
Female = 830
14∼18 Self-report   Sex, type/time of computer, daily use time/posture (mobile phone), daily use time (tablet), mental health problems 7
Joergensen
2021
Denmark pre-adolescents 45,555 Male = 21,711
Female = 23,844
11∼12 Self-report     Sex, age, family type, on parental education, household income, physical activity 7

NM = not mentioned.