Table 3.
Cost-Effectiveness of rt-CGM in Pregnant People with T1D
| rt-CGM | SMBG | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK for pregnant people with T1D | |||
| Total cost, £ | 14,165,187 | 23,725,648 | –9,560,461 |
| Glucose monitoring cost per pregnancy, £ | 1,820 | 588 | 1,232 |
| Mean NICU stay, day | 6.6 | 9.1 | |
| Canadian for pregnant people with T1D patients | |||
| Total mean cost, $ | |||
| Ontario | 17,881.01 | 19,699.65 | –1,818.64a |
| British Columbia | 18,091.32 | 19,996.61 | –1,905.29a |
| Alberta | 17,905.15 | 19,908.89 | –2,003.74a |
| Glucose monitoring cost per pregnancy, $ | |||
| Ontario | 4,610.76 | 1,531.40 | 3,079.36 |
| British Columbia | 4,610.75 | 1,234.44 | 3,376.31 |
| Alberta | 4,610.76 | 1,234.44 | 3,376.32 |
| Mean NICU stay, day | 6.0 | 8.7 |
rt-CGM, real-time continuous glucose monitoring; T1D, type 1 diabetes; SMBG, self-monitoring blood glucose; NICU, neonatal intensive care unit.
a
There was no significant difference in the mean values between the CGM group and SMBG group.