Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2023 Jan 31;130(6):646–654. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.01.015

Table 3.

Rates of eye care utilization by frailty group, adjusted. Negative binomial regression results assessing incident rate ratio for each eye care utilization category by frailty group, adjusted for age, gender, glaucoma severity, race, and socioeconomic status.

Table 3: Rates of Eye Care Utilization by Frailty Group, Adjusted

Outcomes Incident Rate Ratio
Mildly frail (CFIa 0.20–0.29)b Moderately and severely frail (CFI 0.30–1)b Black/African Americanc Otherd

Outpatient eye examinations, office visits, consultations 0.99 (0.98, 1.00) 0.85 (0.83, 0.88) 0.93 (0.92, 0.95) 1.03 (1.01, 1.04)
Inpatient, emergency department encounters 2.38 (1.60, 3.56) 5.03 (2.36, 10.71) 2.12 (1.35, 3.34) 1.29 (0.70, 2.38)
Nursing facility encounters, home visits 5.65 (3.47, 9.21) 34.89 (14.82, 82.13) 1.60 (0.86, 2.96) 1.07 (0.51, 2.22)
Visual field tests 0.88 (0.86, 0.89) 0.64 (0.60, 0.67) 0.95 (0.94, 0.97) 1.07 (1.05, 1.09)
Retinal nerve fiber layer optical coherence tomography tests 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 0.77 (0.73, 0.81) 0.80 (0.78, 0.82) 0.97 (0.95, 1.00)
Glaucoma drugs dispensed, days 0.94 (0.90, 0.98) 0.88 (0.81, 0.96) 0.98 (0.93, 1.03) 0.97 (0.91, 1.03)
Selective laser trabeculoplasties 0.93 (0.86, 1.01) 0.74 (0.60, 0.92) 0.97 (0.88, 1.06) 1.03 (0.89, 1.19)
Glaucoma surgeries 0.87 (0.78, 0.97) 0.74 (0.55, 0.99) 1.20 (1.08, 1.34) 1.19 (1.07, 1.33)
a

Claims-based frailty index

b

Relative to non-/prefrail cohort (CFI 0–0.19)

c

Relative to non-Hispanic White beneficiaries

d

Aggregate of Hispanic, Asian/Pacific Islander, and other beneficiaries, relative to non-Hispanic White beneficiaries