Table 3.
ligand type | sample | EF (μM) | TF (μM) | AF (μM) |
---|---|---|---|---|
native | citrate-Au | 1 | 2 | 2 |
polyphenols | EGCG-Au | 20 | N.D.b | N.D. |
TA-Au | 20 | 50 | N.D. | |
phosphine ligands | TCEP-Au | 0.5 | 5 | N.D. |
DPPS-Au | 5 | 50 | 100 | |
BSPP-Au | 10 | N.D. | N.D. | |
thiolate ligands | DTT-Au | 1 | 50 | N.D. |
MPA-Au | 5 | 50 | 50 | |
MPS-Au | 10 | 50 | N.D. | |
GSH-Au | 50 | 50 | N.D. | |
HS-PEG~110-COOH-Au | 50 | 100 | N.D. | |
LA-PEG12-COOH-Au | N.D. | 50 | N.D. | |
LA-ZW-Au | 50 | 50 | N.D. | |
macromolecular ligands | X4C4-Au | 20 | N.D. | N.D. |
PAA-Au | 5 | N.D. | N.D. | |
PSS-Au | 0.5 | 10 | 5 | |
PVP-Au | 2 | 10 | 5 | |
LA-PIMA-PEG15-Au | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. | |
BSA-Au | N.D. | N.D. | N.D. |
The aggregation induced by electrostatic fragment (EF), thiolate fragment (TF), and aromatic fragment (AF) is through electrostatic, covalent, and π–π stacking interaction, respectively.
“N.D.” indicates NP aggregation Not Detected under the tested conditions.