Abstract
We have previously shown that maternal endotoxin exposure leads to a phenotype of cerebral palsy and pro-inflammatory microglia in the brain in neonatal rabbits. “Activated” microglia overexpress the enzyme glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII) that hydrolyzes N-acetylaspartylglutamate to N-acetylaspartate and glutamate, and we have shown previously that inhibiting microglial GCPII is neuroprotective. Glutamate-induced injury and associated immune signaling can alter microglial responses including microglial process movements for surveillance and phagocytosis. We hypothesize that inhibition of GCPII activity could alter microglial phenotype and normalize microglial process movement/dynamics. Newborn rabbit kits exposed to endotoxin in utero, when treated with dendrimer-conjugated 2-(phosphonomethyl)-pentanedioic acid (D-2PMPA), a potent and selective inhibitor of microglial GCPII, showed profound changes in microglial phenotype within 48 h of treatment. Live imaging of hippocampal microglia in ex vivo brain slice preparations revealed larger cell body and phagocytic cup sizes with less stable microglia processes in CP kits compared to healthy controls. D-2PMPA treatment led to significant reversal of microglial process stability to healthy control levels. Our results emphasize the importance of microglial process dynamics in determining the state of microglial function in the developing brain and demonstrate how GCPII inhibition specifically in microglia can effectively change the microglial process motility to healthy control levels, potentially impacting migration, phagocytosis, and inflammatory functions.
Keywords: Dendrimer, Nanoparticle, Glutamate carboxypeptidase II, Microglia, Cerebral palsy
Introduction
Glutamate is the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian central nervous system, and increased extracellular glutamate can result in injury and death of neurons. A major source of glutamate in the nervous system is from hydrolysis of the abundant neuropeptide N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) to N-acetylaspartate and glutamate by the enzyme glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII) [1, 2]. We have previously shown that although normal microglia constitutively express very low levels of GCPII, they are rapidly upregulated in “activated” glia [3, 4]. In the rabbit model of maternal inflammation-induced cerebral palsy (CP) and in a mouse model of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury, we have shown that GCPII expression increases in “activated” microglia in the neonatal brain, potentially leading to glutamate excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation [3, 4].
Inhibition of GCPII has been shown to be neuroprotective in preclinical models of pathological conditions like traumatic brain injury, stroke, epilepsy, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and neuropathic pain [5–11]. Additionally, GCPII inhibition increases extracellular levels of NAAG, decreases the release of glutamate through the effect of NAAG on presynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) 3, and leads to increased release of TGFβ [12, 13]. NAAG has also been shown to be neuroprotective in neonatal brain injury [14, 15]. Therefore, GCPII inhibition is a potent therapeutic target with translational implications in neonatal brain injury [16, 17]. In animal models of neurologic diseases, selective GCPII inhibitor 2-(phosphonomethyl)-pentanedioic acid (2-PMPA) was shown to enhance brain NAAG levels and improve cognitive function [9, 11, 18]. Despite promising therapeutic data in preclinical models, 2-PMPA exhibits poor pharmacokinetics and brain bioavailability, when injected systemically, making it unsuitable for clinical translation [18]. In this study, we used 2-PMPA conjugated to dendrimer (D-2PMPA) that specifically targets microglial GCPII and has been shown to be more potent and efficacious when compared to the equivalent amount of the free 2-PMPA [18].
Microglia continually protrude and withdraw their processes to perform active surveillance of their microenvironment in physiological conditions and in response to injury [19–21]. These microglia process dynamics are perturbed in neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in disease-specific ways to modulate microglial functions like phagocytosis or cytokine release [22–24]. Microglia in organotypic slice culture from CP rabbits showed a decrease in migration distance and velocity compared to healthy controls [25]. However, changes in microglial process motility in response to exposure to maternal inflammation and therapy remain unexplored. We hypothesize that exposure to maternal inflammation will lead to alterations in microglial surveillance function as determined by process motility, and targeting GCPII in activated microglia using D-2PMPA would reverse these changes in the neonatal rabbit model of CP.
Materials and Methods
Materials
Dendrimer-conjugated 2-PMPA and Dendrimer-2-PMPA-Cy5 was synthesized using generation 4 hydroxyl polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimers (∼4 nm, neutral) followed by purification and characterization as described previously [18].
Animal Model of CP
New Zealand white rabbits from Robinson Services were bred for the laparotomy surgery on gestational day 28, as described previously [3, 26, 27] and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Johns Hopkins University. Briefly, anesthetized rabbit dams received four intra-uterine LPS injections divided between both horns (0.2 mL volume/horn and total LPS dose ˜ 2,400 EU). On gestational day 30, rabbit dams were induced with intravenous Pitocin (oxytocin, 150 mIU) and kits delivered were labeled and randomly divided between treatment arms. 0.2 mL of either saline or D-2PMPA (20 mg/kg on 2-PMPA basis dissolved in saline) was administered intravenously on day of birth. Following 48 h of IV treatment, the kits were sacrificed for live brain slice preparation or formalin fixation for histological analysis.
Ex vivo Brain Slice Preparation
Rabbit kits were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and decapitated. Brains were removed and transferred to oxygenated (95% O2/5% CO2), ice-cold N-methyl-D-glutamine (NMDG)-based buffer (Buffer 1, in mM: 93 NMDG, 2.5 KCl, 10 MgSO4, 0.5 CaCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 30 NaHCO3, 25 glucose, 20 HEPES, 5 sodium ascorbate, 3 sodium pyruvate; PH 7.2–7.4). Coronal brain slices containing the hippocampus (300 μM) were then obtained using a vibratome (VT1200, Leica). Slices were first incubated in the NMDG-based solution at 34°C for 10 min, then transferred and maintained in the same solution for an hour at room temperature before starting subsequent experiment. 50 µL of Tomato lectin, Texas red (Vector Laboratories) was added in 5 mL of Buffer1-containing brain slices and incubated for 30 min while oxygenation. Live imaging is done in solution containing Buffer2 (in mM: 126 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.5 MgCl2, 2.4 CaCl2, 1.2 NaH2PO4, 10 HEPES, 11 glucose) at room temperature. For live imaging, a hippocampal brain slice was transferred to a recording chamber and perfused with oxygenated Buffer2 (2 mL/min). Brain slices were visualized under an upright microscope equipped with laser scanning confocal optics (LSM 880, Zeiss).
Microglial Process Movement Analysis
Microglial process movement analysis was performed in MATLAB, and the confocal images were processed in Image J as previously described [28]. Z-stacked images were collected from the hippocampus every minute for 10 min, producing 10 time points. Maximum-intensity z-projections were made (20–30 µm thick) and movement artifacts and photobleaching were corrected for before analysis (Fiji). A MATLAB script [28] was used to compare pixels across a series of three images and compares each pixel across consecutive time points to generate a stability index. Any new process extension that remained in the same position for 3 min or more is considered stable, and the stable extensions divided by all extensions is termed as stability index for quantification.
Live Cell Imaging
Hippocampal or cortical brain slices were imaged at room temperature, at a depth of ∼50 μm in the slice (to avoid studying superficial microglia that had started to become activated by the slicing procedure) using a Zeiss LSM 880 microscope (with a 63X lens). For microglia imaging, brain slices were incubated with lectin for 30 min prior to imaging. Images were 512 × 512 pixels and covered a square field of view 130–150 μm wide. The pixel dwell time was 1 μs. Z-stack of 1–2-μm interval in the vertical direction was used to image 25–35-μm thick brain region of interest. 5–8 rabbit kits per treatment arm were used for live microglia imaging studies.
Immunohistochemistry
For immune staining of microglia, the rabbits were anesthetized and transcardially perfused with phosphate buffer saline. The brains were collected and post-fixed in 10% formalin overnight and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose solution. Coronal sections (30 µm, 1:6 series) were incubated in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide solution, blocked by 5% normal donkey serum in 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with goat anti-IBA1 (1:500, Abcam, MA, USA), followed by incubation with biotinylated secondary antibodies (1:250; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). ABC kit and DAB solution from Vector Laboratories (Burlingame) were used according to manufacturer’s protocol to label the microglia. Subsequently, processed sections were dehydrated and cover slipped using mounting medium for imaging. To evaluate the colocalization of D-2PMPA-cy5 in astrocytes or microglia, the sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with chicken anti-GFAP (1:250, Abcam, MA, USA) and goat anti-IBA1 (1:500, Abcam) followed by fluorescent secondary antibodies (1:250; Life Technologies, MA, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. Upon incubation with DAPI (1:1,000, Invitrogen) for 15 min, slides were washed, dried, and cover slipped with mounting medium. Confocal images were acquired with Zeiss ZEN LSM 710 (Zeiss, CA, USA) and processed with ZEN software.
Statistics
Statistical comparisons were made between groups using Prism software (GraphPad). Sample size was not predetermined but is consistent with previously published studies. Statistical comparisons were done using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc comparisons as indicated in the figure legends or unpaired t test. Data reported are mean ± SEM.
Results
D-2PMPA Localizes in Microglia of CP Kits after Intravenous Administration
To evaluate the localization of D-2PMPA, Cy5-conjugated D-2PMPA (20 mg/kg in 0.2 ml) was administered intravenously to CP kits on day of birth (PND1). Kits were sacrificed 24 h post-injection and coronal sections of 30 µm were processed for immunohistochemistry to identify astrocytes (GFAP) and microglia (Iba1). Confocal microscopy showed predominant colocalization of D-PMPA-Cy5 in activated astrocytes and microglia in newborn CP kits (Fig. 1). Angle of lateral ventricle, a highly proliferative zone containing neural progenitor cells (Fig. 1a), and corpus callosum with commissural axon fibers (Fig. 1b) showed morphologically activated microglia containing D-2PMPA-Cy5.
Enlarged Microglia Cell Body and Phagocytic Cup in CP Kits
To understand the functional effects of D-2PMPA on microglia morphology and process motility, confocal live imaging of microglia in ex vivo brain slice was performed. Morphological features of hippocampal microglia in CP kits after 48 h of treatment with saline or D-2PMPA (20 mg/kg) were compared against the microglia from age-matched healthy control (Fig. 2a). The microglia cell body perimeter in saline treated CP kits is significantly larger (Fig. 2b). Similarly, the phagocytic cup size is more extensive in microglia from CP kits (Fig. 2c). D-2PMPA did not affect the phagocytic cup size but significantly reversed the cell body perimeter within 48 h of treatment (Fig. 2).
D-2PMPA Stabilizes Microglia Processes in CP Kits
In addition, we characterized microglial process stability over a period of 10 min in live ex vivo brain slices (Fig. 3a–c). Rabbit CP kits were divided into 2 groups and received a single dose of either saline or D-2PMPA (containing 20 mg/kg 2-PMPA) on PND1 and were sacrificed at 48 h posttreatment. Microglia from treatment groups were compared with age-matched healthy controls. Among the saline and D-2PMPA treated groups, there were significant differences in the stability index, a measure of extensions that persisted longer over time (Fig. 3b). We further quantified the microglial processes in formalin-fixed cryo-sections using IBA1 immunohistochemistry. Microglia in the healthy controls and CP kits with and without treatment with D-2PMPA were quantified using neurolucida tracing. Treatment with D-2PMPA significantly increased the microglia process length, implying increased ramification (Fig. 3c).
Discussion
This study investigates the therapeutic potential of PAMAM dendrimer-conjugated 2-PMPA and its underlying effect on microglial features in the rabbit model of CP. PAMAM dendrimer conjugation with 2-PMPA increased the specificity of targeting 2-PMPA precisely to activated glia, where GCPII is upregulated [3]. This precise microglial targeting of 2-PMPA with D-2PMPA restored microglial process movement and dynamics similar to those of healthy control levels. We conclude that selective inhibition of glial GCPII inhibition by D-2PMPA reinstates microglial process stability that can potentially benefit microglia function and postnatal brain development. This is consistent with our previous studies which demonstrate that inhibiting microglial GCPII using dendrimers is neuroprotective in a mouse model of neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury [4].
Microglial phagocytosis [29, 30] is increased when there is neurologic injury [31, 32]. A transient increase in phagocytosis and phagocytic cup size is seen in the early postnatal period as part of normal development, playing an important role in synaptic pruning and neurogenesis [33, 34]. As part of microglial maturation, the phagocytic cup size diminishes and processes change from thick to thin [35]. We saw an increase in phagocytic cup size in the endotoxin-exposed kits at 48 h when compared to controls. Although D-2PMPA treatment led to stabilization of the microglial processes and thinner, longer processes, it did not decrease the phagocytic cup size at 48 h after treatment. This may indicate that the increased phagocytic function to clear debris and apoptotic cells after an injury is retained. A temporal evaluation of phagocytic cup size and process length is crucial for a better understanding of how inflammation affects microglial function over time. Pro-inflammatory microglia can exhibit abnormal phagocytosis including engulfing live neurons and neural stem cells, leading to reduced neurogenesis [34, 35]. The decreased microglial process stability seen in our model may also be seen in other injuries such as hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy where microglia-mediated neuroinflammation may play a significant role in ongoing injury [4, 36].
Selective inhibition of overexpressed GCPII in activated microglia can increase NAAG levels which can exert its neuroprotective effects by activating mGluR3 on microglia and astrocytes [13, 37–39]. mGluR3 is known to regulate cAMP and PKA levels in glia [40, 41]. Such fine regulation of cAMP can control process formation, membrane ruffling, phagocytosis, migration, and chemotaxis of microglia [42–44]. Indeed, mGluR3 activation has been shown to promote Aβ clearance by microglia and astrocytes [45], supporting a significant role of NAAG-mGluR3-cAMP pathway in microglial functions. Similarly, in an in vivo rat model of perinatal brain injury, mGluR3 receptors demonstrated strong regulation of inflammation and selective pharmacological activation of mGluR3 receptors alleviated inflammatory-induced brain injury [46]. Furthermore, mGluR3 activation in astrocytes can be neuroprotective by releasing neurotrophic factors such as TGFβ and BDNF [12, 47]. In an in vitro study using newborn rabbit-mixed glial cultures exposed to LPS, we showed that treatment with D-2PMPA led to an increase in NAAG in the supernatant along with increased cellular expression of mGluR3 and TGFβ [18]. Therefore, increased NAAG can modulate microglial function either directly through its action on microglial mGluR3 or indirectly through the release of TGFβ from astrocytes.
The role and contribution of microglia in neuroinflammation and neuro-excitotoxicity is increasingly appreciated in neurologic injury including CP [30, 48]. Notably, glutamate excitotoxicity can act synergistically with neuroinflammation, resulting in worsening injury in CP [49]. Activated microglia in the CP brain can synthesize and export glutamate substantially [3], leading to abnormal neurotransmission and excitotoxicity. Glutamate produced by activated microglia can bind mGluRs expressed by glia, modulating their function [47]. A thorough understanding of the role of activated microglia and glutamate metabolism will be critical for the future development of novel therapeutics targeting glutamate dysregulation mediated by glia.
This study demonstrates that inhibition of GCPII leads to early changes in microglial function, as indicated by process stability changes. This may have implications for surveillance functions of normal microglia that are crucial for normal development [30, 44]. Future studies will focus on the long-term implications of these changes on microglial surveillance function and migration and sex-related changes in microglial function as a result of injury and therapy.
Statement of Ethics
The rabbit surgery and treatment protocols used in this study were reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins Animal Care and Use Committee, protocol number RB20M322.
Conflict of Interest Statement
Under license agreements involving Ashvattha Therapeutics, Inc., and the Johns Hopkins University, Drs. Slusher, R. Kannan, S. Kannan and the Johns Hopkins University are entitled to royalty distributions and share ownership related to technology involved in the study discussed in this publication. This arrangement has been reviewed and approved by the Johns Hopkins University in accordance with its conflict of interest policies.
Funding Sources
This work was funded in part by NIH NINDS Grant No. R01NS093416 (S.K., R.M.K., and B.S.S.).
Author Contributions
N.S., S.K., B.S., and R.M.K. conceived and designed this study. N.S., Z.Z., A.C., A.F., A.M.-T., and A.S. acquired and analyzed the data presented. N.S., Z.Z., S.K., B.S., and R.M.K. contributed substantially to the manuscript and figure preparation.
Funding Statement
This work was funded in part by NIH NINDS Grant No. R01NS093416 (S.K., R.M.K., and B.S.S.).
Data Availability Statement
All experimental data are included in this report. Any further information/data will be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Berger UV, Luthi-Carter R, Passani LA, Elkabes S, Black I, Konradi C, et al. Glutamate carboxypeptidase II is expressed by astrocytes in the adult rat nervous system. J Comp Neurol. 1999 Dec 6;415(1):52–64. . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Carter RE, Coyle JT. Glutamate carboxypeptidase II. Handbook of proteolytic enzymes. Elsevier; 2004. p. 960–3. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Zhang Z, Bassam B, Thomas AG, Williams M, Liu J, Nance E, et al. Maternal inflammation leads to impaired glutamate homeostasis and up-regulation of glutamate carboxypeptidase II in activated microglia in the fetal/newborn rabbit brain. Neurobiol Dis. 2016 Oct;94:116–28. 10.1016/j.nbd.2016.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Arteaga Cabeza O, Zhang Z, Smith Khoury E, Sheldon RA, Sharma A, Zhang F, et al. Neuroprotective effects of a dendrimer-based glutamate carboxypeptidase inhibitor on superoxide dismutase transgenic mice after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Neurobiol Dis. 2021 Jan;148:105201. 10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Slusher BS, Vornov JJ, Thomas AG, Hurn PD, Harukuni I, Bhardwaj A, et al. Selective inhibition of NAALADase, which converts NAAG to glutamate, reduces ischemic brain injury. Nat Med. 1999 Dec;5(12):1396–402. 10.1038/70971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ghadge GD, Slusher BS, Bodner A, Canto MD, Wozniak K, Thomas AG, et al. Glutamate carboxypeptidase II inhibition protects motor neurons from death in familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9554–9. 10.1073/pnas.1530168100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bařinka C, Rojas C, Slusher B, Pomper M. Glutamate carboxypeptidase II in diagnosis and treatment of neurologic disorders and prostate cancer. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(6):856–70. 10.2174/092986712799034888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Cavaletti G, Slusher B. Regulation of glutamate synthesis via inhibition of glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII): an effective method to treat central and peripheral nervous system disorders. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(9):1259–60. 10.2174/092986712799462577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Rahn KA, Watkins CC, Alt J, Rais R, Stathis M, Grishkan I, et al. Inhibition of glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII) activity as a treatment for cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Dec 4;109(49):20101–6. 10.1073/pnas.1209934109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Potter MC, Wozniak KM, Callizot N, Slusher BS. Glutamate carboxypeptidase II inhibition behaviorally and physiologically improves pyridoxine-induced neuropathy in rats. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e102936. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hollinger KR, Alt J, Riehm AM, Slusher BS, Kaplin AI. Dose-dependent inhibition of GCPII to prevent and treat cognitive impairment in the EAE model of multiple sclerosis. Brain Res. 2016;1635:105–12. 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.01.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Thomas AG, Liu W, Olkowski JL, Tang Z, Lin Q, Lu XC, et al. Neuroprotection mediated by glutamate carboxypeptidase II (NAALADase) inhibition requires TGF-beta. Eur J Pharmacol. 2001 Oct 26;430(1):33–40. 10.1016/s0014-2999(01)01239-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Neale JH, Olszewski RT, Zuo D, Janczura KJ, Profaci CP, Lavin KM, et al. Advances in understanding the peptide neurotransmitter NAAG and appearance of a new member of the NAAG neuropeptide family. J Neurochem. 2011 Aug;118(4):490–8. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07338.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cai Z, Lin S, Rhodes PG. Neuroprotective effects of N-acetylaspartylglutamate in a neonatal rat model of hypoxia-ischemia. Eur J Pharmacol. 2002 Feb 22;437(3):139–45. 10.1016/s0014-2999(02)01289-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bratek E, Ziembowicz A, Salinska E. N-Acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) pretreatment reduces hypoxic-ischemic brain damage and oxidative stress in neonatal rats. Antioxidants. 2020;9(9):877. 10.3390/antiox9090877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Johnston MV, Hoon AH Jr. Cerebral palsy. Neuromolecular Med. 2006;8(4):435–50. 10.1385/NMM:8:4:435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Neale JH, Yamamoto T. N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) and glutamate carboxypeptidase II: an abundant peptide neurotransmitter-enzyme system with multiple clinical applications. Prog Neurobiol. 2020 Jan;184:101722. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2019.101722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hollinger K, Sharma A, Tallon C, Lovell L, Thomas A, Zhu X, et al. Dendrimer-2PMPA selectively blocks upregulated microglial GCPII activity and improves cognition in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. Nanotheranostics. 2022;6(2):126–42. 10.7150/ntno.63158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Davalos D, Grutzendler J, Yang G, Kim JV, Zuo Y, Jung S, et al. ATP mediates rapid microglial response to local brain injury in vivo. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(6):752–8. 10.1038/nn1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nimmerjahn A, Kirchhoff F, Helmchen F. Resting microglial cells are highly dynamic surveillants of brain parenchyma in vivo. Science. 2005;308(5726):1314–8. 10.1126/science.1110647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cserép C, Pósfai B, Lénárt N, Fekete R, László ZI, Lele Z, et al. Microglia monitor and protect neuronal function through specialized somatic purinergic junctions. Science. 2020;367(6477):528–37. 10.1126/science.aax6752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Davalos D, Ryu JK, Merlini M, Baeten KM, Le Moan N, Petersen MA, et al. Fibrinogen-induced perivascular microglial clustering is required for the development of axonal damage in neuroinflammation. Nat Commun. 2012;3(1):1227–15. 10.1038/ncomms2230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Condello C, Yuan P, Schain A, Grutzendler J. Microglia constitute a barrier that prevents neurotoxic protofibrillar Aβ42 hotspots around plaques. Nat Commun. 2015;6(1):6176–14. 10.1038/ncomms7176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Merlini M, Rafalski VA, Ma K, Kim K-Y, Bushong EA, Rios Coronado PE, et al. Microglial G i-dependent dynamics regulate brain network hyperexcitability. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24(1):19–23. 10.1038/s41593-020-00756-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhang F, Nance E, Alnasser Y, Kannan R, Kannan S. Microglial migration and interactions with dendrimer nanoparticles are altered in the presence of neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Mar 22;13(1):65. 10.1186/s12974-016-0529-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Kannan S, Dai H, Navath RS, Balakrishnan B, Jyoti A, Janisse J, et al. Dendrimer-based postnatal therapy for neuroinflammation and cerebral palsy in a rabbit model. Sci Transl Med. 2012 Apr 18;4(130):130ra46. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Zhang Z, Narayan S, Su L, Al-Alawyat H, Liu J, Kannan S. Cerebellar injury and impaired function in a rabbit model of maternal inflammation induced neonatal brain injury. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019 Nov;165:106901. 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Stowell RD, Sipe GO, Dawes RP, Batchelor HN, Lordy KA, Whitelaw BS, et al. Noradrenergic signaling in the wakeful state inhibits microglial surveillance and synaptic plasticity in the mouse visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2019 Nov;22(11):1782–92. 10.1038/s41593-019-0514-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Sun H-N, Kim S-U, Lee M-S, Kim S-K, Kim J-M, Yim M, et al. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase-dependent activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signal pathways is required for lipopolysaccharide-induced microglial phagocytosis. Biol Pharm Bull. 2008;31(9):1711–5. 10.1248/bpb.31.1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Butovsky O, Weiner HL. Microglial signatures and their role in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Oct;19(10):622–35. 10.1038/s41583-018-0057-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Galloway DA, Phillips AE, Owen DR, Moore CS. Phagocytosis in the brain: homeostasis and disease. Front Immunol. 2019;10:790. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lyu J, Jiang X, Leak RK, Shi Y, Hu X, Chen J. Microglial responses to brain injury and disease: functional diversity and new opportunities. Transl Stroke Res. 2021;12(3):474–95. 10.1007/s12975-020-00857-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Maggi L, Scianni M, Panzanelli P, et al. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science. 2011;333(6048):1456–8. 10.1126/science.1202529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Ueno M, Yamashita T. Bidirectional tuning of microglia in the developing brain: from neurogenesis to neural circuit formation. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014;27:8–15. 10.1016/j.conb.2014.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Perez-Pouchoulen M, VanRyzin JW, McCarthy MM. Morphological and phagocytic profile of microglia in the developing rat cerebellum. Eneuro. 2015;2(4):ENEURO.0036-15.2015. 10.1523/ENEURO.0036-15.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Shi AC, Khoury ES, Sah N, Fowler A, Liaw K, Sharma A, et al. Characterization of microglial phagocytosis and dendrimer nanoparticle uptake in a neonatal rabbit model of cerebral palsy. Precision Nanomedicine. 2021;4(4):840–50. 10.33218/001c.29729. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhou J, Neale JH, Pomper MG, Kozikowski AP. NAAG peptidase inhibitors and their potential for diagnosis and therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(12):1015–26. 10.1038/nrd1903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Vornov J, Hollinger K, Jackson P, Wozniak K, Farah M, Majer P, et al. Still NAAG’ing after all these years: the continuing pursuit of GCPII inhibitors. Adv Pharmacol. 2016;76:215–55. 10.1016/bs.apha.2016.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Neale JH, Olszewski R. A role for N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) and mGluR3 in cognition. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019;158:9–13. 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Durand D, Carniglia L, Caruso C, Lasaga M. Reduced cAMP, Akt activation and p65-c-Rel dimerization: mechanisms involved in the protective effects of mGluR3 agonists in cultured astrocytes. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22235. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. McMullan SM, Phanavanh B, Li GG, Barger SW. Metabotropic glutamate receptors inhibit microglial glutamate release. Asn Neuro. 2012;4(5):e00094. 10.1042/AN20120044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lee S, Chung CY. Role of VASP phosphorylation for the regulation of microglia chemotaxis via the regulation of focal adhesion formation/maturation. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2009 Dec;42(4):382–90. 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Schneble N, Schmidt C, Bauer R, Müller JP, Monajembashi S, Wetzker R. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase γ ties chemoattractant-and adrenergic control of microglial motility. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2017;78:1–8. 10.1016/j.mcn.2016.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Bernier L-P, Bohlen CJ, York EM, Choi HB, Kamyabi A, Dissing-Olesen L, et al. Nanoscale surveillance of the brain by microglia via cAMP-regulated filopodia. Cell Rep. 2019;27(10):2895–908. e4. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Durand D, Carniglia L, Turati J, Ramírez D, Saba J, Caruso C, et al. Amyloid-beta neurotoxicity and clearance are both regulated by glial group II metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2017;123:274–86. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zinni M, Mairesse J, Pansiot J, Fazio F, Iacovelli L, Antenucci N, et al. mGlu3 receptor regulates microglial cell reactivity in neonatal rats. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):13–6. 10.1186/s12974-020-02049-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Aronica E, Gorter JA, Ijlst-Keizers H, Rozemuller AJ, Yankaya B, Leenstra S, et al. Expression and functional role of mGluR3 and mGluR5 in human astrocytes and glioma cells: opposite regulation of glutamate transporter proteins. Eur J Neurosci. 2003 May;17(10):2106–18. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Vainchtein ID, Molofsky AV. Astrocytes and microglia: in sickness and in health. Trends Neurosci. 2020 Mar;43(3):144–54. 10.1016/j.tins.2020.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Marret S, Vanhulle C, Laquerriere A. Pathophysiology of cerebral palsy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;111:169–76. 10.1016/B978-0-444-52891-9.00016-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All experimental data are included in this report. Any further information/data will be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.