Table 2:

Definitions of six quality dimensions and an overall utility score used in our expert evaluation, along with their corresponding Likert systems.

Evaluation dimensions	Definition	Likert system
Additions	The impression is not repetitive and does not include unnecessary findings.	3: No additions; 2: Moderate additions; 1: Excessive additions.
Omissions	The impression contains all important findings.	3: No omissions; 2: Moderate omissions; 1: Significant omissions.
Factual correctness	The impression accurately represents the findings and is devoid of factual errors.	3: Correct; 2: Partially correct; 1: Substantially incorrect.
Clarity and organization	The impression is unambiguous, grammatical, and well-organized.	3: Good; 2: Adequate; 1: Poor.
Interpretive and technical jargon	The impression provides appropriate interpretations of the findings and avoids using unnecessary radiologic jargon or details.	3: Appropriate; 2: Partially appropriate; 1: Inappropriate.
Recommendations	The recommendations for patient management, if applicable, are clinically valid.	3: Appropriate; 2: Partially appropriate; 1: Inappropriate.
Overall utility score	Given the impression as an initial draft, consider how many changes would you make to render it suitable for clinical use.	5: Acceptable with no changes needed; 4: Acceptable with minor changes needed; 3: Acceptable with moderate changes needed; 2: Unacceptable with significant changes needed; 1: Unusable