Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 27;11:e16135. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16135

Table 1. Descriptives, intercorrelations between latent variables, and internal consistencies of Study 1.

Model M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1. Followership: AE (t1) 5.18 0.87 .96″
2. Followership: ICT (t1) 4.62 1.00 .41*** .75″
3. Job satisfaction (t1) 5.03 1.14 .20* −.11 .86′
4. Organizational commitment (t1) 5.34 1.18 .27** −.05 .56*** .78′
5. Self-efficacy (t1) 5.27 0.95 .58*** .31*** .20* .31*** .87′
6. Followership: AE (t2) 5.16 0.88 .80*** .24* .33*** .32*** .52*** .98″
7. Followership: ICT (t2) 4.79 0.91 .32** .86*** .08 .16 .36*** .41*** .69″
8. Job satisfaction (t2) 5.96 1.12 .05 .01 .72*** .41*** .12 .17* .04 .88′
9. Organizational commitment (t2) 5.20 1.25 .27** .03 .45*** .96*** .34*** .32*** .26* .39*** .75′
10. Self-efficacy (t2) 5.27 0.89 .45*** .18 .16* .31*** .81*** .58*** .34*** .16 .31*** .86′

Notes.

N = 184.

AE
Active engagement
ICT
Independent, critical thinking

Values along the diagonal represent internal consistency (′ω or ″ωs).

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.