Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2023 Oct 30;12:RP89141. doi: 10.7554/eLife.89141

The PMA phorbol ester tumor promoter increases canonical Wnt signaling via macropinocytosis

Nydia Tejeda-Munoz 1,2,, Yagmur Azbazdar 1,, Julia Monka 1, Grace Binder 1, Alex Dayrit 1, Raul Ayala 3, Neil O'Brien 3, Edward M De Robertis 1,
Editors: Christof Niehrs4, Didier YR Stainier5
PMCID: PMC10615368  PMID: 37902809

Abstract

Activation of the Wnt pathway lies at the core of many human cancers. Wnt and macropinocytosis are often active in the same processes, and understanding how Wnt signaling and membrane trafficking cooperate should improve our understanding of embryonic development and cancer. Here, we show that a macropinocytosis activator, the tumor promoter phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), enhances Wnt signaling. Experiments using the Xenopus embryo as an in vivo model showed marked cooperation between the PMA phorbol ester and Wnt signaling, which was blocked by inhibitors of macropinocytosis, Rac1 activity, and lysosome acidification. Human colorectal cancer tissue arrays and xenografts in mice showed a correlation of cancer progression with increased macropinocytosis/multivesicular body/lysosome markers and decreased GSK3 levels. The crosstalk between canonical Wnt, focal adhesions, lysosomes, and macropinocytosis suggests possible therapeutic targets for cancer progression in Wnt-driven cancers.

Research organism: Xenopus

Introduction

Cancer progression is a process during which mutations in various signaling pathways accumulate in the cell leading to uncontrolled growth (Kinzler and Vogelstein, 1996; Hanahan and Weinberg, 2011). Cancer progression is also influenced by tumor promoters, substances that do not mutate the DNA by themselves but nevertheless facilitate cancer development. In 1941, Berenblum and Rous found that inflammatory agents such as croton oil or turpentine could induce skin cancer when applied repeatedly to mouse or rabbit skin, but only when an initiator mutagen such as benzopyrene or anthracene had been previously painted on that patch of skin (Berenblum, 1941; Rous and Kidd, 1941). The active agent in croton oil was later purified and found to be the phorbol ester phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), also known as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). The molecular mechanism by which PMA promotes cancer is incompletely understood but involves the activation of protein kinase C (PKC) in the plasma membrane, where PMA mimics the endogenous second messenger diacylglycerol (DAG) (Nishizuka, 1984). Tumor promoters cause chronic inflammation and significantly contribute to tumorigenesis (Weinberg and Weinberg, 2007).

The canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway is a major driver of cancer and plays a crucial role in embryonic development (MacDonald et al., 2009; Nusse and Clevers, 2017). In the case of colon cancer, the great majority of tumors are initiated by mutation of the tumor suppressor Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC), which is a component of the destruction complex that normally degrades the transcriptional regulator β-catenin, leading to its accumulation in the nucleus and benign polyp formation (Kinzler and Vogelstein, 1996; Segditsas and Tomlinson, 2006). Activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is also the driving force in many other cancers (Galluzzi et al., 2019). A key regulator of Wnt signaling is Glycogen Synthetase 3 (GSK3), which phosphorylates β-catenin, leading to the formation of a phosphodegron that triggers its degradation in the proteasome. Upon activation of the Wnt receptors, GSK3, together with the destruction complex, is sequestered into multivesicular bodies (MVBs), also known as the late endosomes (Taelman et al., 2010; Vinyoles et al., 2014). The translocation of GSK3 from the cytosol into MVBs/lysosomes leads to the stabilization of many other cellular proteins in addition to β-catenin, in a process designated Wnt-STOP (Wnt-Stabilization of Proteins) (Acebron et al., 2014; Albrecht et al., 2021).

The many GSK3 phosphorylation targets stabilized by Wnt signaling include regulators of macropinocytosis such as Ras, Rac1, and Pak1 (Taelman et al., 2010; Albrecht et al., 2020; Jeong et al., 2012). A recent advance was the realization that Wnt signaling requires macropinocytosis (i.e., cell drinking) in order to traffic activated Wnt receptors and GSK3 to MVBs and lysosomes (Redelman-Sidi et al., 2018; Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2019). Wnt-induced macropinocytosis also causes the internalization of focal adhesions (FAs) and integrins from the cell surface into MVBs (Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2022c). The requirement of macropinocytosis for Wnt signaling is revealed, for example, by the decrease in nuclear β-catenin when colorectal cancer (CRC) cells mutant for APC were treated with macropinocytosis inhibitors such as the derivative of the diuretic Amiloride known as 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) Amiloride (EIPA) (Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2019; Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a; Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022b).

Macropinocytosis is emerging in the field as a promising target for cancer treatment (Lambies and Commisso, 2022). In addition, it has been found that the macropinocytosis induced by Wnt signaling causes significant lysosome acidification and activation (Albrecht et al., 2020). There is also accumulating evidence showing that the size and number of lysosomes increase during carcinogenesis (Cardone et al., 2005; Kroemer and Jäättelä, 2005; Zhitomirsky and Assaraf, 2016). Lysosomes, previously thought to be the garbage disposal of the cell, have emerged as central organelles in cancer (Kirkegaard and Jäättelä, 2009; Kirkegaard and Jäättelä, 2009).

From the considerations above, investigating the intersection of Wnt signaling, macropinocytosis, lysosomes, FAs, and membrane trafficking, is of great interest. While in most cells macropinocytosis requires stimulation of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) (Haigler et al., 1979; Yoshida et al., 2018), Ras (Bar-Sagi and Feramisco, 1986; Commisso et al., 2013), or Wnt (Redelman-Sidi et al., 2018; Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2019), some cells, such as amoebae and macrophages, have constitutive macropinocytosis. Importantly, Swanson discovered that the phorbol ester PMA stimulated macropinocytosis even in macrophages that were thought to have fully activated constitutive macropinocytosis (Swanson, 1989).

In the present study, we asked whether phorbol ester could interact with canonical Wnt signaling. Using the Xenopus embryo, which provides a premier model system to analyze the Wnt pathway, we found that PMA, which lacked any effects on its own, greatly sensitized the embryo to dorsalization by Wnt signaling, leading to the formation of radial head structures lacking trunks. The dorsalizing effect of PMA on embryos was blocked by the macropinocytosis inhibitor EIPA, the lysosomal V-ATPase inhibitor Bafilomycin A (Baf), or the Rac1 inhibitor EHT1864. Rac1 is an upstream regulator of the p21-activated kinase 1 (Pak1) required for actin-mediated macropinocytosis. Lysosomal activity was specifically required at the 32-cell stage for the activity of the Wnt-mimicking GSK3 inhibitor Lithium Chloride (LiCl). Ectopic axes induced by dominant- negative GSK3 (DN-GSK3-β) or β-catenin mRNAs were blocked by EIPA or dominant-negative Rab7, indicating a widespread requirement of membrane trafficking for Wnt signaling.

The involvement of membrane trafficking in Wnt-driven cancer was supported by immunostaining results of arrayed human CRC histological sections, in which we found that the grade of malignancy increased Pak1, CD63 (an MVB marker), and V0a3 (a V-ATPase subunit that marks lysosomes) levels, while decreasing GSK3. In Xenopus embryos, twinning induced by Xwnt8 mRNA microinjection was blocked by inhibition of Rac1. In cultured CRC SW480 cells reconstituted with APC, the FA marker Tes was cytoplasmic, while the same cells mutant for APC (in which the Wnt pathway is activated) Tes was nuclear. The results suggest that macropinocytosis and membrane trafficking play an important role in embryogenesis and cancer progression.

Results

The phorbol ester PMA potentiates Wnt-like signals in Xenopus embryos via macropinocytosis and lysosomal acidification

Wnt is one of the earliest signals in the embryo and it induces the formation of the primary dorsal–ventral and head-to-tail axes (Loh et al., 2016; Niehrs, 2012). It is known that β-catenin is required for Wnt signaling activation on the dorsal side during early cleavage. Recently, we reported that inhibition of macropinocytosis with EIPA, or of lysosomal acidification with Baf, ventralized endogenous early dorsal axis formation, leading in particular to reduced head and brain structures (Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a). Activation of lysosomes on the dorsal side of the embryo was detectable as early as the 64-cell stage (Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a).

The tumor promoter PMA is known to increase macropinocytosis in macrophages (Swanson, 1989). To test its activity during early development, we used a sensitized system in which a small amount of the GSK3 inhibitor LiCl (4 nl at 300 mM in a single ventral injection at 4-cell) causes only a small dorsalization with slightly enlarged heads (Kao et al., 1986; Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a). The dorsalizing effects of PMA were most striking when phenotypes were analyzed at the early tailbud stage (Figure 1A–H). LiCl alone expanded head structures only slightly and PMA alone was without effect (Figure 1A, B, E). However, the combination of PMA and LiCl lead to radially dorsalized embryos consisting of head structures lacking trunks (compare Figure 1B–F). This striking phenotype was eliminated by co-injection of EIPA or Baf, suggesting that macropinocytosis and lysosomal acidification are required for the effect of PMA (Figure 1G, H). Injection of Baf alone decreased head and neural development, supporting a requirement for lysosomes for endogenous dorsal axis formation (Figure 1D). Target genes of the early Wnt signal can be detected at blastula (stage 9.5, just after the start of zygotic transcription) by measuring transcripts of Siamois and Xnr3 by qRT-PCR (Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a). As shown in Figure 1I, PMA alone (4 nl at 500 nM) was without any effect, LiCl increased the Wnt target genes, and the combination of PMA and LiCl synergized significantly elevated Siamois and Xnr3 transcript levels, while EIPA and Baf blocked the increase in Siamois and Xnr3 caused by PMA/LiCl (Figure 1I).

Figure 1. The phorbol ester phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) synergizes with GSK3 inhibition and Wnt3a and this cooperation requires macropinocytosis and lysosome acidification.

(A) Uninjected control embryo at stage 24. (B) Lithium Chloride (LiCl) (4 nl 300 mM, 1x ventral) dorsalized the embryo only slightly. (C) 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) Amiloride (EIPA) (1 mM, 1x ventral) alone did not produce a distinctive phenotype at this concentration. (D) The vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) inhibitor Bafilomycin A1 (Baf) (incubation with 5 μM for 7 min at 32 cells) ventralized embryos. (E) A single injection of PMA (500 nM) did not show any phenotypic effect. (F) PMA and LiCl strongly synergized, resulting in embryos with radial heads. (G) Co-injection of the EIPA macropinocytosis inhibitor blocked dorsalization caused by LiCl plus PMA. (H) Incubation with Baf lysosomal acidification inhibitor blocked dorsalization caused by LiCl plus PMA. Number of embryos was as follows: A = 70, 100%; B = 80; 98%; C = 75, 94%; D = 82, 92%; E = 76, 100%; F = 112, 98%; G = 75, 93%; H = 85, 98%. Scale bar, 500 μm. (I) PMA increases the effects of LiCl in Wnt signaling in early embryos. qRT-PCR analysis at blastula stage 9.5 of the Wnt target genes Siamois and Xnr3 normalized for Ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) transcripts. Embryos received a single injection of 4 nl of LiCl 300 mM with or without PMA (500 nM). Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (**p < 0.01). (J) Luciferase assay in HEK293BR cells showing cooperation between PMA and LiCl, and its inhibition by Baf. (KP) PMA and Wnt3a cooperated in stimulating macropinocytosis, which was sensitive to inhibition by EIPA, in 3T3 cells. TMR-dextran 70 kDa was added for 1 hr. (Q) Quantification of the Wnt3a + PMA results. Experiments with cultured cells were biological triplicates. Error bars denote standard deviation (****p < 0.0001 and **p < 0.01).

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. In cultured cells, the phorbol ester phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) cooperates with GSK3 inhibition in β-catenin signaling and increases dextran macropinocytosis.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) HEK293BR (β-catenin activity reporter [BAR]/Renilla) cells stained with total β-catenin antibody. (B) HEK293BR cells treated with Baf (20 μM) overnight show no changes in β-catenin levels. (C) Treatment with PMA (1.5 μM) moderately increased β-catenin levels. (D) HEK293BR cells treated with PMA and Baf had low β-catenin levels. (E) Cells treated with Lithium Chloride (LiCl) (40 mM) showed an increase in β-catenin. (F) Baf treatment blocked the increase in β-catenin caused by LiCl. (G) PMA strongly cooperated with LiCl in the induction of β-catenin levels. (H) Baf treatment blocked the cooperative effect of LiCl and PMA, indicating a requirement for lysosome acidification. (I) Quantification of β-catenin fluorescence per cell with the different treatments indicated above. (J) SW480 colorectal cancer (CRC) cells showing basal levels of TMR-dextran 70 kDa. (K) Treatment with PMA for 2 hr increased dextran uptake by macropinocytosis in SW480 cells. All experiments with cultured cells were biological triplicates. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (**p < 0.01),.**p < 0.001, (**** p < 0.0001). Scale bars, 10 μm.

Using the BAR (β-catenin activity reporter) assay system (Biechele and Moon, 2008) in a cultured HEK293 permanent BAR/Renilla cell line, PMA synergized with LiCl when assayed by transcriptional BAR luciferase activity (Figure 1J). PMA on its own had no detectable effect on BAR reporter activity (Figure 1—figure supplement 1J). In this cell line, PMA cooperated with LiCl to increase β-catenin levels (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A–H). PMA alone caused a slight increase in β-catenin protein staining, but this lacked statistical significance (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C, I), presumably due to a small amount of endogenous Wnt secreted by this cell line (Colozza et al., 2020). Importantly, the effect of PMA on the activation of the Wnt pathway by GSK3 inhibition was abrogated by the inhibition of V-ATPase with Baf (Figure 1—figure supplement 1H, I).

To test the effect of PMA on Wnt-induced macropinocytosis we used an uptake assay in which 3T3 cells were treated with dextran for 1 hr (Figure 1K–P). The macropinocytosis marker TMR-dextran 70 kDa has a hydrated diameter of more than 200 nM and is diagnostic of large endocytic cups, in particular when sensitive to the macropinocytosis inhibitor EIPA (Commisso et al., 2013; Commisso et al., 2014). In the presence of Wnt3a, but not in the absence, PMA strongly induced dextran uptake and this effect was blocked by EIPA (Figure 1K–P, quantitated in Figure 1Q). PMA also increased dextran uptake in the SW480 CRC cell line that has constitutive Wnt signaling, even in the absence of added Wnt (Figure 1—figure supplement 1J, K). In time-lapse video microscopy of SW480 cells with the plasma membrane tagged by myristoylated-GFP (mGFP), PMA addition triggered the abundant formation of macropinosome cups within minutes of addition when compared to DMSO (Dimethylsulfoxide) controls (Video 1).

Video 1. An SW480 colorectal cancer (CRC) cell before and after treatment with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) (0.3 µM); the plasma membrane was marked by transfection of myristoylated-GFP (mGFP) and filmed for 15 min.

Download video file (136.1KB, mp4)

Note that PMA greatly enhanced plasma membrane vesicular activity typical of macropinocytosis. Control cell was treated with DMSO alone and shows low but detectable macropinocytosis cup formation. The arrowheads indicate two prominent macropinocytosis vesicles.

These results in embryos and cultured cells indicate that the tumor promoter PMA potentiates Wnt signaling and that this cooperation requires macropinocytosis and lysosomal acidification.

Lysosomal activity is required at the 32-cell stage for early Wnt activation

In previous work, we had shown that immersion of embryos in the V-ATPase inhibitor Baf at 5 µM for only 7 min at the 32-cell stage resulted in ventralized microcephalic embryos lacking cement glands (Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a). To test whether this ventralization is caused by inhibition of the endogenous Wnt pathway signal, we now carried out order-of-addition experiments. When an initial Baf incubation of 7 min was followed by a second brief incubation in LiCl while still at the 32-cell stage, the ventralization by Baf was rescued, and the resulting tailbud embryos had a LiCl-like dorsalized phenotype (Figure 2A–D). The initial effect of GSK3 by LiCl is to trigger macropinocytosis (Albrecht et al., 2020). The phenotypes are supported by the activation of Wnt signaling at the blastula stage, as indicated by qRT-PCR of direct Wnt target genes (Figure 2E). In the converse experiment, when embryos were first briefly treated with LiCl, washed, and subsequently incubated for 7 min in Baf, the effect of lysosomal inhibition was dominant, resulting in ventralized tailbud embryos (Figure 2F–J). These order-of-addition experiments strongly support the proposal that membrane trafficking and endogenous lysosomal activity are required to generate the initial endogenous Wnt signal that takes place at the 32-cell stage of development (Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a).

Figure 2. Order-of-addition experiment showing that lysosomal acidification at 32-cell stage is required for early Wnt/β-catenin activation.

Figure 2.

(A) Untreated embryo. (B) Baf treatment (5 μM for 7 min) inhibited endogenous axis formation resulting in ventralized embryos lacking heads at early tailbud. (C) Embryos treated with Baf, washed, and then immersed in 300 mM Lithium Chloride (LiCl) an additional 7 min formed heads, resulting in dorsalized embryos with enlarged heads and short trunks. Note that all treatments were done at 32-cell stage, which is critical for the early Wnt signal. (D) LiCl treatment alone dorsalized embryos. (E) Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR) for Wnt target genes Siamois and Xnr3 at blastula, confirming that the phenotypic effects are due to early activation of the Wnt pathway. (F) Untreated embryo. (G) Embryos incubated with LiCl at 32-cell were dorsalized. (H) Embryos first treated with LiCl and then subsequently with Baf resulted in ventralized embryos lacking heads. (I) Baf treatment caused ventralization and small heads. (J) Quantitative RT-PCR for Wnt target genes Siamois and Xnr3 showing that inhibiting V-ATPAse at the 32-cell stage blocks the effect of earlier LiCl treatment. The numbers of embryos analyzed were as follows: A = 11 5, 100%; B = 124, 98% with phenotype; C = 132, 97%; D = 99%; F = 132, 100%; G = 135, 99%; H = 126, 97%; I = 129, 98% (scale bars, 500 μm.). Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (**p < 0.01).

Wnt pathway signaling in microinjected embryos or APC mutant cells requires macropinocytosis and membrane trafficking

Next, we tested the requirement for macropinocytosis of different components of the Wnt pathway using the axis duplication assay (McMahon and Moon, 1989). Microinjection of Wnt-mimic dominant-negative GSK3 (DN-GSK3-β) mRNA, a catalytically inactive form of GSK3, induced complete axis duplications, which were blocked by the co-injection of the macropinocytosis inhibitor EIPA (1 mM, 4 nl) (Figure 3A–D). Secondary axis induction by β-catenin mRNA was also abrogated by EIPA, as well as the membrane trafficking inhibitor dominant-negative Rab7 (DN-Rab7) (Figure 3E–H). β-Catenin is a transcriptional activator, and one might have not expected a requirement for membrane trafficking. However, axis formation is a multistep process and appears to require macropinocytosis and Rab7 activity in addition to transcriptional activation of Wnt target genes.

Figure 3. Induction of secondary axes by the GSK3/β-catenin pathway requires membrane trafficking.

Figure 3.

(A) Control embryo at early tailbud. (B) Embryo injected with DN-GSK3 (dominant-negative GSK3-β, 150 pg 1x ventral) mRNA, showing double axes (arrowheads). (C) Injection of 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) Amiloride (EIPA) 1x ventral alone showed no phenotypic effect (4 nl,1 mM). (D) Co-injection of DN-GSK3 and EIPA blocked double axis formation. (E) Uninjected control embryo. (F) Activation of Wnt signaling via injection of β-catenin mRNA (80 pg) induced complete twinned axes (arrowheads). (G) Embryo co-injected with β-catenin mRNA and DN-Rab7 (500 pg) showing that membrane trafficking is required for secondary axis formation. (H) Co-injection of β-catenin mRNA and the macropinocytosis inhibitor EIPA blocks axial duplication. The numbers of embryos analyzed were as follows: A = 62, 100%; B = 75, 94% with double axes; C = 76, 100%; D = 70, 98%; E = 70, 100%; F = 73, 98%; G = 69, 75%; H = 82, 97%; four independent experiments (scale bars, 500 μm).

Macropinocytosis is an actin-driven process that is orchestrated by Pak1 kinase, which in turn is activated by Rac1. Rac1 activity is essential for the formation of lamellipodia and macropinocytic cups (Hall, 1998). EHT1864 (EHT) is a specific inhibitor of Rac1 that has the practical advantage of being water soluble (Hampsch et al., 2017). When embryos were immersed in EHT at the critical 32-cell stage for 7 min (10 mM), head structures were greatly reduced, and ventral posterior structures expanded (Figure 4A, B). This was accompanied by a significant increase of transcripts of the ventral markers Sizzled and Vent1 at the blastula stage (Figure 4C).

Figure 4. The Rac1 inhibitor EHT1864 blocks Wnt signaling in Xenopus embryos, and Rac1 levels are stabilized by treatments that increase Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

(A) Uninjected control embryo. (B) Incubation of the Xenopus embryos with the Rac1 inhibitor EHT at 32-cell stage (7 min, 10 mM) resulted in a ventralized phenotype with a small head in the anterior (A, arrowhead) and expanded ventral structures in the posterior (P). Rac1 activity is required for macropinocytosis, see Figure 4—figure supplement 1. (C) qRT-PCR of gastrula stage embryos showing increased ventral markers Szl and Vent1 after Rac1 inhibition. (D) Control embryo. (E) Injection of Wnt8. mRNA (2 pg) induces complete duplicated axes (arrows). (F) Injected embryos with EHT (1 mM, 4 nl 1x ventral) alone showed no phenotypic effect at this concentration. (G) EHT co-injected with Wnt8 mRNA blocked double axis formation. (H) qRT-PCR of Wnt target genes Siamois and Xnr3 at blastula confirming that Rac1 is required for early Wnt signaling. (I–J’’) Treatment of 3T3 cells with 40 mM Lithium Chloride (LiCl) increases β-catenin and Rac1 levels. (K–L’’) Transfection of 3T3 cells with stabilized constitutively active forms of β-cateninGFP or Lrp6GFP increased levels of Rac1 protein in transfected cells compared to untransfected ones. The numbers of embryos analyzed were as follows: A = 52, 100%; B = 47, 95% with ventralized small head phenotype; D = 58, 100%; E = 67; 97%; F = 64, 96%; G = 62, 97%, four independent experiments. Scale bars for embryos 500 μm; scale bars for immunofluorescence, 10 μm. qRT-PCR experiments represent biological replicates. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (**p < 0.01).

Figure 4.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Macropinocytosis is inhibited in SW480 colorectal cancer (CRC) spheroids by treatment with the Rac1 inhibitor EHT.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1.

(A) Control SW480 spheroids at 96 hr of inverted drop culture. (B) Treatment with 300 nM Rac1 inhibitor (EHT1864) reduced the diameter of SW480 spheroids at 96 hr. (C) Quantification of spheroid area after EHT treatment. (D) The same spheroids incubated with the macropinocytosis marker TMR-dextran 70 kDa for 1 hr. (E) EHT treatment strongly inhibited macropinocytosis. (F) Quantification of macropinocytosis inhibition. Six spheroids were plated per condition, in triplicate. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (**p < 0.01) (***p < 0.001) (scale bars, 500 μm).

Microinjection of a small amount of EHT (1 mM, 4 nl, 1x ventral at 4-cell) was without effect on its own but was able to block the axis duplication effect of microinjecting Wnt8 mRNA (Figure 4D–G). Quantitative RT-PCR analyses at the blastula stage confirmed that inhibiting Rac1 strongly reduced the induction of the Wnt target genes Siamois and Xnr3 caused by xWnt8 mRNA microinjection at the late blastula stage (Figure 4H).

In SW480 CRC cells, which have constitutively activated Wnt due to mutation of APC (Leibovitz et al., 1976; Faux et al., 2004), EHT inhibited the size of cell spheroids in hanging drop cultures (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A–C) and, importantly, significantly inhibited macropinocytosis uptake of TMR-dextran in these cancer cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 1D–F).

Rac1 itself was stabilized in 3T3 cells by Wnt signaling, as indicated by experiments showing (1) that LiCl treatment increased levels of Rac1 protein (Figure 4I–J’’), (2) that cells transfected with constitutively active β-catenin-GFP had higher levels of Rac1 than control untransfected cells (Figure 4K–K’’), and (3) that Rac1 immunostaining was stabilized in cells transfected with CA-Lrp6-GFP when compared to untransfected cells (Figure 4L–L’’).

The results show that signaling by the Wnt/β-catenin pathway requires macropinocytosis, Rac1, and membrane trafficking in Xenopus embryos and cancer cells.

Tumor progression in human CRCs correlates with a role for membrane trafficking in Wnt/β-catenin signaling

CRC is particularly favorable for the analysis of tumor progression because it gradually accumulates mutations, and in over 85% of the cases the initial driver mutation is in the APC tumor suppressor (Kinzler and Vogelstein, 1996; Weinberg and Weinberg, 2007). This offered an opportunity to test our proposal that membrane trafficking and its molecular components play an important role in Wnt-driven cancers (Albrecht et al., 2021). Commercially available arrays of paraffin-sectioned histological sections containing 90 cases of adenocarcinoma of various grades I–IV and 90 samples of corresponding adjacent normal tissues (from TissueArray) were used for immunostaining. Arrays were double stained for β-catenin and antibodies against proteins involved in the macropinocytosis/MVB/lysosome/GSK3 pathway. Each individual section was evaluated, and normal colon, adenocarcinoma I, and adenocarcinoma IV were compared to assess the effects of cancer progression.

As shown in Figure 5, β-catenin levels consistently correlated with grade IV malignancy when compared to normal colon or grade I cancers. Pak1, a kinase required for macropinocytosis and Wnt signaling (Redelman-Sidi et al., 2018; Albrecht et al., 2020) was significantly elevated with increased malignancy (Figure 5A–C’’). CD63, a tetraspan protein that marks MVB intraluminal vesicles (Escola et al., 1998), reached high levels in adenocarcinoma IV (Figure 5D–F’’), particularly in cells with the highest β-catenin expression (compare Figure 5F–F’). This increase in MVBs is in agreement with the GSK3 sequestration model of Wnt signaling (Taelman et al., 2010). The V-ATPase subunit V0a3, a marker for acidic lysosomes (Ramirez et al., 2019), also increased strongly with the CRC malignancy (compare Figure 5G–I). Importantly, the cellular levels of total GSK3 decreased with malignancy (Figure 5J–L’’, compare Figure 5J–L), as predicted by the sequestration model (Taelman et al., 2010). During Wnt signaling, GSK3 is sequestered into MVBs which are trafficked into lysosomes and a decrease was to be expected after sustained Wnt activation. Previously, we had been unable to demonstrate a decrease in total cellular GSK3 levels during acute Wnt signaling experiments (Taelman et al., 2010). The co-localization of β-catenin with Pak1, CD63, V0a3, or GSK3 in human colorectal adenocarcinomas was quantified in Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–D.

Figure 5. Degree of human colorectal cancer (CRC) malignancy is associated with increased macropinocytosis/multivesicular body (MVB)/lysosome markers and decreased GSK3 levels.

(A–A’) Normal human colon paraffin section stained with the macropinocytosis marker Pak1 and β-catenin, respectively.(A’’) Merged image with DAPI (4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), a few cells colocalize both markers. (B–B’’) Pak1 and β-catenin levels are moderately increased at an early stage I CRC adenocarcinoma. (C’–C’’) Strong colocalization between Pak1 and β-catenin was observed in advanced stage IV CRC (inset). (D–D’’) Normal human colon section stained with the MVB marker CD63 and β-catenin; colocalization was not observed. (E–E’’) CD63 and β-catenin were stabilized in adenocarcinoma I, and moderate colocalization was found between CD63 and β-catenin. (F–F’) CD63 and β-catenin were strongly stabilized and colocalized in adenocarcinoma stage IV CRC. (F’’) Merge; note the striking colocalization between the MVB marker CD63 and β-catenin in advanced stages of cancer (inset). (G–G’’) Normal colon stained for V0a3 (a subunit of V-ATPase that marks lysosomes) and β-catenin. (H–H’’) Stage I adenocarcinoma with moderately increased levels of lysosomes and β-catenin. (I–I’’) Strong co-localization of lysosomes and β-catenin in stage IV CRC (see inset). (J–J’’) Human colon array stained with the GSK3 and β-catenin. (K–K’’) GSK3 decreases, and β-catenin increases, at early stages of carcinogenesis, (L–L’’) GSK3 levels are very low in advanced CRC compared to normal human colon, while β-catenin levels are very high. Scale bars, 10 μm. Also see Figure 5—figure supplement 1 for quantifications and mouse xenografts of CRC cell.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Malignancy of colorectal cancer positively correlates with macropinocytosis, multivesicular body (MVB), and lysosome markers, and inversely correlates with GSK3 levels.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A–D) Quantification of the colocalization between Pak1, CD63, V0a3, and GSK3 with β-catenin in normal colon and at different stages of cancer from the histological sections shown in Figure 5. (E–E’ ) Immunohistochemistry of normal colon tissue from the CD1 NU/NU nude mice stained for the macropinocytosis marker Pak1 and β-catenin. (E’’) Merge with DAPI. (F–F’’) SW480 xenograft showing correlation between high levels of Pak1 and β-catenin colocalization (see inset). (G) Quantification of colocalization of Pak1 and β-catenin. (H–H’’) Control colon immunostained for V0a3 and β-catenin. (I–I’’) SW480 tumor showing a strong increase in the lysosomal marker V0a3 and β-catenin. (K–K’) Normal colon sample from mouse stained for GSK3 and β-catenin staining. Note that normal colon has GSK3 staining. (L–L’’) SW480 xenograft tumor showing reduced levels of GSK3, and high levels of β-catenin. (M) Quantification of the levels of GSK3 in normal conditions and in tumor cells; note that the decrease in GSK3 levels supports the GSK3 sequestration model of Taelman et al., 2010. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (**p < 0.01). (Scale bars, 10 μm). Human tissue arrays were quantified in triplicate fields.

These results were confirmed by examining immunostaining levels of Pak1, V0a3, and GSK3 compared to β-catenin protein in mouse xenografts in a CD1 NU/NU nude mouse model injected with SW480 human CRC cells (in which Wnt activation is known to be caused by APC mutation, Faux et al., 2004). In this case, tumor cells were compared to normal colon mouse tissue sections. The results showed that CRC cells had high levels of β-catenin, Pak1, and lysosomes (Figure 5—figure supplement 1E–J), while GSK3 levels were reduced (compare Figure 5—figure supplement 1K–L) in agreement with the results in human tissue arrays.

These in vivo observations in human tumors are consistent with the view that macropinocytosis components, MVBs, and lysosomes increase with CRC malignancy. Further, the decrease in total GSK3 levels suggests a role in the trafficking and degradation of this key enzyme in cancer.

Wnt affects the subcellular localization of FA components

We have previously reported a crosstalk between the Wnt and FA signaling pathways in which Wnt3a treatment rapidly led to the endocytosis of Integrin β1 and of multiple FA proteins into MVBs (Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2022c). FAs link the actin cytoskeleton with the extracellular matrix (Figure 6A), and we now investigated whether FA activity is affected by Wnt signaling, PMA treatment, or CRC progression. FA components containing LIM domains can shuttle between the nucleus and cytoplasm (Nix and Beckerle, 1997; Kadrmas and Beckerle, 2004; Anderson et al., 2021). We examined whether constitutive Wnt signaling regulates FA trafficking using the SW480 and SW480APC system, in which the stable reconstitution with full-length APC restores these CRC cells to a non-malignant phenotype (Faux et al., 2004), which is accompanied by a decrease in β-catenin levels (Figure 6B). As shown in Figure 6C–D’’, the PET-LIM domain FA protein Tes (also known as Testin) (Garvalov et al., 2003) was cytoplasmic in SW480APC, but was nuclear in SW480 cells in which Wnt is activated by APC mutation. The nuclear localization of Tes in SW480 cells required macropinocytosis, as suggested by treatment with EIPA which resulted in its re-localization to the cytoplasm (Figure 6E–F’’). In the nude mouse xenograft model, Tes was abundant in the cytoplasm of normal colon epielium, while in transplanted SW480 cells it colocalized with β-catenin in the nucleus of those cells with the highest β-catenin levels (Figure 6G–I’’). The function of TES is poorly understood, but it has been proposed to act as a tumor suppressor (Tatarelli et al., 2000; Tobias et al., 2001).

Figure 6. A focal adhesion protein changes its nucleocytoplasmic distribution after Wnt signaling activation, and focal adhesion kinase inhibition affects Wnt/β signaling.

(A) Diagram showing how focal adhesions connect the actin cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix via integrins; Wnt signaling changes the distribution of the focal adhesion protein Tes from focal adhesion sites to the nucleus. (B) Western blot of SW480 cells with and without stable expression of Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC); note the reduction in Tes expression and increase in β-catenin levels in SW480 cells lacking full-length APC. GADPH was used as loading control. (C–C’) Colon cancer cell line SW480 stably restored with full-length APC stained with Tes and β-catenin antibodies. Note that in SW480APC cells TES is absent from the nucleus (inset). (D–D’’) In SW480 colorectal cancer (CRC) cells both Tes and β-catenin are located the nucleus (inset). (E–E’’) Colon cancer cell line SW480 stained with Tes (in green) and β-catenin (in red) antibodies as a control. (F–F’’) Inhibiting macropinocytosis with 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) Amiloride (EIPA) (40 μM) treatment restored the cytoplasmic localization of the focal adhesion protein Tes in SW480 cells and strongly inhibited β-catenin levels. (G) Quantification of colocalization between Tes and β-catenin in normal mouse colon and SW480 xenografts. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (**p < 0.01) (H–H’) Immunohistochemistry of the CD1 NU/NU normal mouse colon showing Tes and β-catenin distribution. (H’’) Merge showing modest co-localization (inset). (I–I’’) Immunohistochemistry images of the CD1 NU/NU mouse xenograft model showing nuclear TES, which is strongly colocalized with β-catenin levels in transplanted human SW480 cancer cells (inset). Scale bars, 10 μm. (J) Reporter assay in HEK293T cells stably expressing β-catenin activity reporter (BAR) and Renilla, showing strong inhibition of the β-catenin transcriptional activity induced by Lithium Chloride (LiCl) (40 mM) by focal adhesion kinase (FAK) inhibitor PF-00562271 (20 μM) after overnight treatment. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (***p < 0.001). (K–L’’’) Immersion of Xenopus embryos in FAK inhibitor (7 min at 32-cell stage) inhibits head and dorsal development. Bright field and several angles of in situ hybridization with pan-neural marker Sox2 are shown to demonstrate reduction in brain structures indicated by the arrowhead; scale bar 500 μm.

Figure 6—source data 1. Original files with the uncropped western blots used in Figure 6B.

Figure 6.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1. The phorbol ester phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) stabilizes focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and enhances β-catenin levels in cells with constitutive Wnt signaling.

Figure 6—figure supplement 1.

(A–B’’) FAK inhibitor PF-00562271 (100 nM) reduces FAK and β-catenin immunostaining levels. (C–D’’) SW480 cells treated with PMA showed increased in β-catenin and FAK levels. (E–E’’) 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) Amiloride (EIPA) (40 μM) overnight treatment blocked the effect of PMA in SW480 cells. (F–F’’) Baf (500 nM) treatment also blocked the effect of PMA in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. (G–G’’) EIPA treatment alone was sufficient to reduce β-catenin and FAK levels in SW480 cells. (H–H’’) Baf treatment also reduced β-catenin and FAK protein levels in SW480 cells. Experiments in cultured cells represent biological triplicates. Error bars denote standard error of the mean (SEM) (n ≥ 3) (**p < 0.01). Scale bars, 10 μm.

Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is a key regulator of FA maintenance and signaling, known to interact with the Wnt pathway in various ways (Chuang et al., 2022). In HEK293 BAR/Renilla cells, treatment with the FAK inhibitor PF-00562271 strongly decreased β-catenin signaling by LiCl inhibition of GSK3 (Figure 6J; see also Figure 6—figure supplement 1A–B’’). In the context on the Xenopus embryo, treatment with the FAK inhibitor (100 µM, 7 min at 32-cell stage) resulted in ventralized embryos with reduced dorsal-anterior structures such as central nervous system, in particular brain structures stained by the pan-neural marker Sox2 (Figure 6K’–L’’). The addition of the tumor promoter PMA to SW480 cells (in which the Wnt pathway is constitutively activated) strongly increased protein levels of β-catenin and FAK protein (Figure 6—figure supplement 1C–D’’). The effect of PMA on β-catenin and FAK levels was abrogated by EIPA or Baf treatment (Figure 6—figure supplement 1C–H’’), suggesting that it requires macropinocytosis and lysosome activity.

Taken together, the results suggest a possible involvement of FA components and FAK in Wnt signaling, in particular during the endogenous early Wnt signal in Xenopus embryos. The results also suggest that nuclear Tes could serve as a Wnt-regulated marker in CRC. The regulated shuttling of FA components between nucleus and cytoplasm is probably just the tip of the iceberg of the role of membrane trafficking in Wnt-driven cancers.

Discussion

The present work was inspired by the discovery that PMA increases macropinocytosis (Swanson, 1989). PMA plays an important role in our understanding of tumor biology because it is the archetypal tumor promoter, able to promote tumor growth without further mutation of the DNA (Berenblum, 1941; Weinberg and Weinberg, 2007). Our experiments support the role of membrane trafficking in canonical Wnt signaling in embryos and cancer cells and are summarized in the model in Figure 7. The main finding was a synergistic positive effect between the tumor promoter phorbol ester (PMA) and activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway that was blocked by EIPA or Baf (Figure 1). EIPA is a macropinocytosis inhibitor of the Na+/H+ exchanger at the plasma membrane; it causes acidification of the submembranous cytoplasm and prevents actin polymerization (Koivusalo et al., 2010). Bafilomycin A (Baf) is an inhibitor of the V-ATPase that drives membrane trafficking and lysosomal acidification. PMA activates the PKC pathway (Takai et al., 1979; Nishizuka, 1984), and there is previous literature on the crosstalk between the PKC and Wnt pathways (Schwarz et al., 2013; Goode et al., 1992). What is novel in the present paper is the crosstalk between macropinocytosis, membrane trafficking, lysosomes, FAs, PMA, and Wnt signaling.

Figure 7. Model of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) synergy with Wnt signaling through macropinocytosis and membrane trafficking Wnt and PMA are activators of macropinocytosis, which is a cell drinking process driven by an actin meshwork that requires the small GTPase Rac1.

Figure 7.

Membrane trafficking into multivesicular bodies (MVBs)/lysosomes (marked by CD63) requires acidification by V-ATPase, which is inhibited by Bafilomycin A (Baf). Phorbol esters such as PMA stimulate macropinocytosis and synergize with Wnt signaling. Inhibiting macropinocytosis with the membrane trafficking inhibitors 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) Amiloride (EIPA), Baf, or the Rac1 inhibitor EHT1864 block Wnt signaling and its cooperation with the tumor promoter PMA.

Macropinocytosis, Rac1, and Wnt signaling

Wnt signaling triggers macropinocytosis and lysosomal acidification (Albrecht et al., 2020). In cultured cells, Wnt3a-induced macropinocytosis was increased by PMA and blocked by EIPA. In embryo microinjections, Baf blocked the synergy between PMA and the Wnt-mimic LiCl. Baf also blocked development of the endogenous axis, particularly the head region when embryos were briefly immersed in Baf at the 32-cell stage, as previously reported (Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a). Using order-of-addition experiments in which embryos were treated with 7 min pulses of Baf or the GSK3 inhibitor LiCl, we showed that the requirement for lysosome acidification was due to inhibition of the Wnt pathway at the crucial 32-cell stage (Figure 2). Co-injection experiments of DN-GSK3 or β-catenin mRNAs with DN-Rab7 or EIPA supported the view that membrane trafficking and macropinocytosis are essential for the induction of secondary axes in Xenopus (Figure 3).

Rac1 is an upstream regulator of the Pak1 kinase required for the actin machinery that drives macropinocytosis (Redelman-Sidi et al., 2018). Rac1 is a member of the family of small Rho GTPases that drives the formation of lamellipodia, membrane ruffles, and macropinocytosis (Hall, 1998; Egami et al., 2014; Fujii et al., 2013). The Rac1 inhibitor EHT1864 (Hampsch et al., 2017) strongly ventralized the endogenous axis of embryos after brief incubation at the critical 32-cell stage (Figure 4). In co-injection experiments EHT blocked the axis-inducing effect of microinjected xWnt8 mRNA. Rac1 is a regulator of multiple signaling cascades and has been reported to increase the nuclear translocation of β-catenin (Wu et al., 2008). Other work has shown that Rac1 binds to β-catenin and promotes the formation of nuclear β-catenin/LEF1 complexes (Jamieson et al., 2015). In the context of the present study, Rac1 protein levels were increased by treatments that enhanced Wnt/β-catenin signaling. The results suggest that Rac1 may crosstalk with Wnt through macropinocytosis in early development.

Lysosomes, cancer and FAs

The lysosome is considered a promising target for the treatment of cancer (Fehrenbacher and Jäättelä, 2005; Lawrence and Zoncu, 2019). We used human CRC tissue arrays to analyze whether lysosomes and membrane trafficking correlate with cancer progression. Most colorectal tumors are initiated by mutation of APC, which drives Wnt signaling (Kinzler and Vogelstein, 1996; Segditsas and Tomlinson, 2006). It was found that advanced grades of colon carcinoma correlated with increased immunostaining for Pak1 (a driver of macropinocytosis), CD63 (a MVB/late endosome marker), and V0a3 (a lysosomal V-ATPase marker) (Figure 5). Importantly, cancer malignancy correlated with low levels of GSK3 staining, both in human samples and nude mouse SW480 xenografts. Cancer cells require lysosome function and have changes in lysosomal volume and subcellular localization during oncogenic transformation (Kirkegaard and Jäättelä, 2009; Kirkegaard and Jäättelä, 2009; Gocheva and Joyce, 2007; Kolwijck et al., 2010). V-ATPase has been associated with acidification of the extracellular milieu in tumors (Capecci and Forgac, 2013; Hinton et al., 2009; Perona and Serrano, 1988). Extracellular tumor acidification is probably due to increased numbers of lysosomes which are exocytosed, since V0a3 was located within the cytoplasm in advanced cancer or xenografts in mice (Figure 5I and Figure 5—figure supplement 1I). The results reported here support the view (Taelman et al., 2010; Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a) that Wnt-driven lysosomal acidification and GSK3 sequestration may play a role in cancer. In addition, MVB/lysosome components could serve as markers for advanced Wnt-driven cancers.

The cytoskeleton interacts with proteins of the extracellular matrix though FAs (Geiger et al., 2001). We previously reported that Wnt causes the endocytosis of FA proteins and depletion of Integrin β1 from the cell surface (Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2022c). We now report that Tes, a member of the PET-LIM family of FA proteins, changed subcellular localization after Wnt activation in SW480 cells. Other FA proteins shuttle between the nucleus, cytoplasm, and FA sites, and may play important roles in cancer (Chaturvedi et al., 2012; Nix and Beckerle, 1997). FAK is a key signaling kinase that regulates FA signaling. In SW480 cells (which have constitutive Wnt signaling), FAK protein levels were increased by PMA, and this was inhibited by EIPA or Baf. The FAK inhibitor PF-00562271 inhibited β-catenin signaling in Luciferase assays, and reduced dorsal-anterior structures such as CNS in embryos after incubation for 7 min at 32-cell stage that is critical for the early Wnt signaling. These results suggest a possible crosstalk between FAs, Wnt signaling and tumor promoters in cancer progression and embryonic development.

Cooperation between PMA and Wnt

PMA activates PKC signaling by mimicking its physiological second messenger DAG, an activator of PKC. There is previous literature implicating PKC isozymes in the regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway (Fang et al., 2002; Goode et al., 1992) and that different PKC isoforms can have positive or negative effects on Wnt/β-catenin signaling (Ohno and Nishizuka, 2002). However, the molecular role of PKC isoforms in the Wnt signaling pathway remains poorly understood (Bhatia and Spiegelman, 2005; Schwarz et al., 2013). It has been reported that PMA can stabilize CK1ε (Casein Kinase 1 epsilon), enhance its kinase activity, and induce LRP6 phosphorylation at Thr1479 and Ser1490, leading to the activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (Su et al., 2018). In the context of the present study, it is relevant that Wnt signaling rapidly triggers macropinocytosis and trafficking into lysosomes (Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2019). Macropinocytosis requires the activation of phosphoinositide 3 kinase (PI3K) which leads to the formation of patches of PIP3 in the inner plasma membrane leaflet that initiate the formation of macropinocytic cups (Egami et al., 2014; Yoshida et al., 2018). During macropinosome formation, the PIP3 lipid is then converted into DAG by phospholipase C gamma 1 (PLCγ1), and DAG activates PKC signaling (Yoshida et al., 2018). It seems likely that PMA may facilitate Wnt/β-catenin signaling by mimicking the DAG lipid in macropinosomes. We have tested this hypothesis by direct addition of DAG to cells and found cooperation with Wnt signaling (Azbazdar et al., 2023).

In the future, it will be interesting to study the role of chronic inflammation on macropinocytosis and tumor promotion. Active PKC phosphorylates many targets, including IκB kinase (IKK), which becomes activated and phosphorylates inhibitor of NF-κB (IκB), targeting it for degradation and triggering inflammation (Weinberg and Weinberg, 2007). Tumor progression is promoted by many chronic inflammatory agents such as turpentine, distilled alcoholic beverages, hepatitis viruses, and Helicobacter pylori that do not cause mutations by themselves but regulate the expansion of previously mutant clones (Rous and Kidd, 1941; Weinberg and Weinberg, 2007). Taken together, the results presented here suggest that macropinocytosis, lysosomal activity, and membrane trafficking are possible therapeutic targets for tumor progression in Wnt-driven cancers.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Cell line (Homo sapiens) HeLa (human cervical adenocarcinoma) ATCC RRID: CVCL_0030
Cell line (Homo sapiens) SW480 (human colorectal) ATCC RRID:CVCL_0546
Biological sample (Xenopus laevis male) Sperm Xenopus I 5215 Albino Xenopus laevis Sexually Mature Male/-/-/M Used for fertilization
Biological sample (Xenopus laevis female) Egg Xenopus I 4280 Sexually Mature Female 10.5–11 cm/-/-/F Used for fertilization
Biological sample (CD1 NU/NU nude mouse female) Charles River Laboratories Xenograft
Antibody Pak1 antibody rabbit polyclonal Abcam Cat# ab131522, RRID:AB_11156726 IF (1:100)
Antibody FAK antibody rabbit polyclonal Cell Signaling Cat# 3285, RRID:AB_ 2269034 IF (1:100)
Antibody Rac-1 antibody rabbit polyclonal Thermo Fisher Cat# PA1-091 IF (1:100)
Antibody CD63 antibody mouse monoclonal Abcam Cat# ab59479
RRID:AB_ 940915
IF (1:100)
Antibody TES antibody rabbit polyclonal ATLAS Cat# HPA018123 RRID:AB_1857900 IF (1:100)
Antibody GSK3 antibody mouse monoclonal Abcam Cat# ab93926, RRID:AB_10563643 IF (1:100)
Antibody Transferrin receptor (TfR) antibody mouse monoclonal Thermo Fisher Cat# 13-6800 IF (1:100)
Antibody ATP6V0a3 antibody rabbit polyclonal Novus Cat# nbp1-89333 RRID:AB_11016312 IF (1:100)
Antibody GAPDH antibody rabbit monoclonal Cell Signaling mAb #2118 WB (1:1000)
Antibody β-Catenin antibody rabbit polyclonal Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 71-2700; RRID:AB_ 2533982 IF (1:100)
Antibody β-Catenin antibody mouse monoclonal Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# MA1-2001; RRID:AB_ 326078 IF (1:100)
Antibody IgG, HRP-linked antibody (horse anti-mouse polyclonal) Cell Signaling Cat# 7076; RRID:AB_330924 WB (1:2500)
Antibody IgG, HRP-linked antibody (goat anti-mouse polyclonal) Cell Signaling Cat# 7074; RRID:AB_2099233 WB (1:2500)
Antibody IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 594) preadsorbed (goat anti-mouse polyclonal) Abcam Cat# ab150120; RRID:AB_2631447 IF (1:200)
Antibody IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 594) preadsorbed (goat anti-rabbit polyclonal) Abcam Cat# ab150084; RRID:AB_ 2734147 IF (1:200)
Antibody IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 488) preadsorbed (goat anti-mouse polyclonal) Abcam Cat# ab150117; RRID:AB_ 2734147 IF (1:200)
Antibody IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor 488) preadsorbed (ab150081) (goat anti-rabbit polyclonal) Abcam Cat# ab150081; RRID:AB_2734747 IF (1:200)
Antibody IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 488 (goat anti-mouse polyclonal) Invitrogen Cat# A-11001; RRID:AB_2534069 IF (1:200)
Antibody IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 568 (goat anti-rabbit polyclonal) Invitrogen Cat# A-11011; RRID:AB_143157 IF (1:200)
Recombinant DNA reagent Dominant-negative (DN)-GSK3-GFP (Xenopus laevis) (plasmid) Addgene RRID:Addgene_29681 K85R and K86R
Recombinant DNA reagent DN-Rab7 (Homo sapiens) (plasmid) Addgene RRID:Addgene_12660 Dominant-negative plasmid
Recombinant DNA reagent pCS2-mGFP (plasmid) Addgene RRID:Addgene_14757 Membrane bound form of EGFP
Recombinant DNA reagent CD63-RFP (Homo sapiens) (plasmid) Addgene RRID:Addgene_62964 RFP tag
Recombinant DNA reagent xWnt8myc (wnt8a.L Frog) (plasmid) Addgene RRID:Addgene_16863
Recombinant DNA reagent β-Catenin-activated reporter (BAR) (plasmid) Addgene RRID:Addgene_12456 Beta-catenin reporter. TCF/LEF sites upstream of a luciferase reporter
Recombinant DNA reagent Renilla reporter (plasmid) Addgene RRID:Addgene_62186 MuLE (Multiple Lentiviral Expression) Entry vector containing a CMV promoter and renilla luciferase module
Recombinant DNA reagent Lipofectamine 3000 Thermo Fisher Cat# L3000001
Peptide, recombinant protein Wnt3a Peprotech Cat# 315-20
Commercial assay or kit mMESSAGE mMACHINE SP6 Transcription Kit Thermo Fisher Cat# AM1340
Commercial assay or kit Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System Promega Cat# E1500
Chemical compound, drug Fibronectin Thermo Fisher Cat# 33016015
Chemical compound, drug Dextran Tetramethylrhodamine (TMR-Dx) 70,000 Thermo Fisher Cat# D1818
Chemical compound, drug 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) amiloride (EIPA) Sigma Cat# A3085
Chemical compound, drug Bafilomycin A1 Selleckchem Cat# S1413
Chemical compound, drug Digitonin Sigma Cat# 300410
Chemical compound, drug Phalloidin Abcam Cat# ab176759
Chemical compound, drug Lithium chloride (LiCl) Sigma Cat# L4408
Chemical compound, drug PF-00562271 (FAK inhibitor) Selleckchem Cat# S2672
Chemical compound, drug Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) TOCRIS Cat# 1201
Chemical compound, drug 5-(N-Ethyl-N-isopropyl) amiloride (EIPA) Sigma Cat# A3085
Chemical compound, drug EHT 1864 Selleckchem Catalog# S7482
Chemical compound, drug Triton X-100 Thermo Fisher Cat# HFH10
Chemical compound, drug Paraformaldehyde Sigma Cat# P6148
Chemical compound, drug Fibronectin Sigma Cat# F4759
Chemical compound, drug Protease inhibitors Roche Cat# 04693132001
Chemical compound, drug Phosphatase inhibitors Calbiochem Cat# 524629
Software, algorithm ImageJ NIH http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
Software, algorithm AxioVision 4.8 Zeiss http://Zeiss.com
Software, algorithm Zen 2.3 imaging software Zeiss http://Zeiss.com
Software, algorithm R R Core Team https://cran.r-project.org
Other 10 cm dish Thermo Fisher Cat# 174903
Other 8-Well glass-bottom chamber slides ibidi Cat# 80827
Other Circular coverslips ibidi Cat# 10815
Other 12-Well dish Thermo Fisher Cat# 150628
Other DMEM (culture medium) Thermo Fisher Cat# 11965092
Other L-15 (culture medium) Thermo Fisher Cat# 11415064
Other Glutamine Thermo Fisher Cat# 25030081
Other Fetal bovine serum (FBS) Thermo Fisher Cat# 16000044
Other Bovine serum albumin (BSA) Thermo Fisher Cat# 9048468
Other Pen-Strep antibiotics Thermo Fisher Cat# 15140122
Other PBS Gibco Cat# 10-010-023
Other PBS Fisher Scientific Cat# BP3994
Other Fluoroshield Mounting Medium with DAPI Abcam Cat# ab104139
Other IM 300 microinjection pump Narishige International USA, Inc N/A
Other Axio Observer Z1 Inverted Microscope with Apotome Zeiss N/A

Materials availability statement

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Edward M. De Robertis.

No new materials were generated in this study. Requests for reagents used should be directed and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact. No custom code, software, or algorithm central to supporting the main claims of the paper were generated in this manuscript.

Experimental model and subject details

Tissue culture and transfection

HeLa (ATCC, CRL-2648) and HEK293T cells stably expressing BAR and Renilla reporters were cultured in DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin. SW480 cells and SW480APC cells (Faux et al., 2004) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (DMEM:Nutrient Mixture F-12), supplemented with 5% FBS, 1% glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin. The cells were seeded at a cell density of 20–30%, and experiments were performed when cells reached between 70 and 80% confluency. Cells were cultured for 6–8 hr in a medium containing 2% FBS before all treatments. All cell lines tested negative for mycoplasma contamination. ATCC cell line authentication services were performed to confirm identity of cultured cell types.

Xenopus embryo microinjection

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols (D16-00124) of the University of California, Los Angeles, Medical School. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of California, Los Angeles (Permit Number: ARC-1995-129). Xenopus laevis embryos were fertilized in vitro using excised testis and staged as described (Colozza and De Robertis, 2014; Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a). In vitro synthesized mRNAs were introduced into embryos by microinjection using an IM 300 Microinjector (Narishige International USA, Inc) of 4 nl into the marginal zone of a ventral blastomere at the 4-cell stage. pCS2-DN-GSK3β, β-catenin, and DN-Rab7 were linearized with NotI and transcribed with SP6 RNA polymerase using the Ambion mMessage mMachine kit. Embryos were injected in 1× MMR (Marc’s Minimal Ringers) and cultured in 0.1× MMR.

Human colon cancer tissue array and immunochemistry

Three sets of colon cancer tissue arrays containing 90 cases of adenocarcinoma and 90 adjacent normal colon tissue (180 tissue cores total) were obtained from TissueArray.com. The company stated that each specimen collected from any clinic was consented to by both the hospital and the individual, and that discrete legal consent forms were obtained and the rights to hold research uses for any purpose or further commercialized uses were waived. Double stained immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin-embedded tissue samples which were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated using graded alcohols. For antigen retrieval, slides were incubated at 95°C for 40 min in citrate buffer (10 mM, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6.0). Tissue sections were than fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma #P6148) for 15 min, treated with 0.2% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Gibco) for 10 min, and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS overnight. Primary and secondary antibodies were added overnight at 4°C. The samples were washed three times with PBS after each treatment, and coverslips were mounted with Fluoroshield Mounting Medium with DAPI (ab104139). Immunofluorescence was analyzed and photographed using a Zeiss Imager Z.1 microscope with Apotome.

Xenograft tumor model

For the CD1 NU/NU nude mouse model, SW480 cells were collected by trypsinization. Then, 7.5 × 105 cells per injection site were resuspended in high-concentration Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NY), diluted in PBS to 50% final concentration, and subcutaneously injected into the flanks of an 8-week-old mouse. After day 7, when the tumor was established, the tumor was measured three times a week until completion. After 3 weeks, tissue was obtained from animals euthanized by CO2 inhalation. Tumor and normal colon were fixed, paraffin-embedded, and 5 μm histological sections were mounted on slides. Mouse experiments were approved by the UCLA Animal Research Committee.

Antibodies and reagents

Total β-catenin antibody (1:1000) was purchased from Invitrogen (712700), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase antibody (1:1000) and FAK antibody (1:1000, 3285) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technologies, anti-ATP6V0a3 antibody (1:500) was obtained from Novus (nbp1-89333, 1:1000). CD63 antibody was obtained from Abcam.

Antibodies against Pak1 (ab131522), Ras (ab52939), GSK3 (ab93926, 1:4000), and secondary antibodies for immunostaining for cells (ab150120, ab150084, ab150117, ab150081) (1:300) were obtained from Abcam. Antibody against the FA protein Tes (HPA018123, 1:100) was obtained from Atlas antibodies. Secondary antibodies for immunostaining arrays (A-11001, A-11011 were obtained from Invitrogen). HRP-linked secondary antibodies 7076, 7074 at 1:5000 (Cell Signaling) were used for western blots and analyzed with an iBright Imaging system. EIPA (A3085), and LiCl (L4408), were obtained from Sigma. Baf (S1413) and PF-00562271 (FAK inhibitor, S2672) were purchased from Selleckchem. TMR-dextran 70 kDa was obtained from Thermo Fisher (D1818). PMA (1201) was purchased from TOCRIS.

Immunostainings

HeLa, HEK293T, SW480, and SW480APC cells were plated on glass coverslips and transferred to 2% FBS 6–12 hr before overnight experimental treatments. Coverslips were acid washed and treated with Fibronectin (10 μg/ml for 30 min at 37°C, Sigma F4759) to facilitate cell spreading and adhesion. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma #P6148) for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS Gibco for 10 min, and blocked with 5% BSA in PBS for 1 hr.

Primary antibodies were added overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed three times with PBS, and secondary antibodies were applied for 1 hr at room temperature. After three additional washes with PBS, the coverslips were mounted with Fluoroshield Mounting Medium with DAPI (ab104139). Immunofluorescence was analyzed and photographed using a Zeiss Imager Z.1 microscope with Apotome.

Transfections

Transfections of β-cateninGFP (0.8 mg) and CA-Lrp6GFP (0.8 mg) were performed on 3T3 cells plated on coverslips for 24 hr. Cells were stained following the immunofluorescence protocol described above and stained with Rac-1 antibody.

Western blots

Cell lysates were prepared using RIPA (Radioimmunoprecipitation Assay) buffer (0.1% NP40, 20 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5), 10% glycerol, together with protease (Roche #04693132001) and phosphatase inhibitors (Calbiochem #524629), and processed as described (Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2019).

Luciferase assay

Experiments were performed with stably transfected HEK293T cells stably expressing BAR and Renilla reporters (Albrecht et al., 2020), treated with LiCl and with or without Bafilomycin for 8 hr, and Luciferase activity measured with the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using the Glomax Luminometer (Promega). Luciferase values of each sample were normalized for Renilla activity.

3D spheroid cell culture

SW480 cells were cultured in a Petri dish using DMEM:F-12 medium with 5% FBS. The top cover was removed from 60 mm tissue culture dishes and 3 ml of PBS placed in the bottom of the dish to act as a hydration chamber. Cells were counted and 500 cells were added as 25 μl drops deposited onto the Petri dish cover, and immediately inverted over the humid chamber. At least 6 drops per condition were plated, keeping enough distance between each other. The inverted drop cultures were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% humidity.

The drops were monitored daily; after 4 days, aggregates had been formed and EHT treatment was added to the spheroids. After 4 days, spheroids were incubated with TMR-dextran 70 kDa (1 mg/ml) for 1 hr, and each spheroid was photographed with an Axio Zoom.V16 Stereo Zoom Zeiss microscope with apotome function.

Time-lapse imaging

SW480 cells were seeded on glass bottom culture dishes (MatTek Corp). After 4 hr, the cells were transfected with mGFP with Lipofectamine 3000 (Albrecht et al., 2020). The video was taken after 3 days in culture. Control cells had DMSO added for 15 min. Then, cells were treated with PMA (0.3 µM) for 15 min. Filming was with a Zeiss Observer.Z1 microscope and AxioVision 4.8.2 SP3 software was used for imaging.

TMR-dextran assays

3T3 or SW480 cells were seeded on cover glass coverslips for 12–18 hr as described in Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2022c. The cells were incubated with Wnt3a overnight in the presence or absence of PMA and EIPA. After incubation, the cells were treated with 1 mg/ml TMR-dextran 70 kDa for 1 hr, then washed, fixed, and blocked for 1 hr with 5% BSA in PBS to reduce background from nonspecific binding. The coverslips were mounted using Fluoroshield Mounting Medium with DAPI (Abcam, ab104139). Immunofluorescence imagings were performed using a Zeiss Imager Z.1 microscope with Apotome.

Bafilomycin and FAK inhibitor treatments, microinjection, and in situ hybridization in Xenopus embryos

We determined experimentally that optimal ventralization with loss of head structures of Xenopus embryos was obtained after incubation with Baf (5 μM) or FAK inhibitor PF-00562271 (100 µM) for 7 min at the 32-cell stage in 0.1× MMR solution. After incubation, embryos were washed two times with 0.1× MMR solution and cultured overnight until early tailbud tadpole stage. Embryos were microinjected once ventrally at the 4-cell stage with any of the following reagents: LiCl (300 mM), PMA (500 nM), EIPA (1 mM), EHT (1 mM), or mRNAs such as DN-GSK3-β (150 pg), DN-Rab-7 (500 pg), and xWnt8 (2 pg), either alone or co-injected with the other reagents. In some experiments, microinjected embryos were incubated in 0.1× MMR solution until the 32-cell stage and transferred to 0.1× MMR solution with or without Baf (5 μM) and incubated for 7 min. Embryos were then washed twice with 0.1× MMR solution and cultured until tadpole stage. In situ hybridization was performed as described at http://www.hhmi.ucla.edu/derobertis.

LiCl and Bafilomycin sequential treatments

Whole embryos at the 32-cell stage were incubated with LiCl (300 mM) alone for 7 min. After this treatment, the embryos were washed two times with 0.1× MMR solution and cultured until the tadpole stage, or incubated again for 7 min in 0.1 MMR solution containing 5 μM Baf, and washed as described before. In the converse experiment, embryos were first treated with Baf and then with LiCl. All treatments were done at the 32-cell stage, which plays a key role in the early Wnt signal (Kao et al., 1986; Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2022c).

qRT-PCR

Quantitative RT-PCR experiments using Xenopus embryos were performed as previously described (Colozza and De Robertis, 2014). Primer sequences for qRT-PCR were as follows:

Gene Forward Reverse Use
ODC CAGCTAGCTGTGGTGTGG CAACATGGAAACTCACACC qRT-PCR
Siamois AAGATAACTGGCATTCCTGAGC GGTAGGGCTGTGTATTTGAAGG qRT-PCR
Xnr3 CGAGTGCAAGAAGGTGGACA ATCTTCATGGGGACACGGA qRT-PCR
Sizzled GTCTTCCTGCTCCTCTGC AACAGGGAGCACAGGAAG qRT-PCR
Vent1 GGCACCTGAACGGAAGAA GATTTTGGAACCAGGTTTTGAC

Quantification and statistical analysis

Data were expressed as means and standard error of the means (SEMs). Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the Student t-test; a p-value of <0.01** was considered statistically significant for differences between means. Fluorescence was quantified in control versus treated cells using ImageJ software analyses with n > 30 cells or n > 30 images from arrays from humans or mouse sample per condition. Fluorescence intensity was normalized in images compared in each condition and results from three or more independent experiments were presented as the mean ± SEM.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Yi Ding and Yuki Moriyama for comments on the manuscript, and to Willy Wong for help depositing data. We are grateful for funding to the UC Cancer Research Coordinating Committee (grant C21CR2039); National Institutes of Health grant P20CA016042 to the University of California, Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center; startup funds from the University of Oklahoma; and the Norman Sprague Endowment for Molecular Oncology.

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Edward M De Robertis, Email: ederobertis@mednet.ucla.edu.

Christof Niehrs, Institute of Molecular Biology, Germany.

Didier YR Stainier, Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • Cancer Research Coordinating Committee C21CRC2039 to Edward M De Robertis.

  • National Institutes of Health P20CA016042 to Edward M De Robertis.

  • Sprague Endowment for Molecular Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles BD-55 to Edward M De Robertis.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – review and editing.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Investigation.

Funding acquisition, Investigation.

Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocols (D16-00124) of the University of California, Los Angeles, Medical School. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of California, Los Angeles (Permit Number: ARC-1995-129).

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

Data have been deposited in the Cell Image Library (CIL): http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/55765.

The following dataset was generated:

Tejeda-Muñoz N, Azbazdar Y, Monka J, Binder G, Dayrit A, Ayala R, O'Brien N, De Robertis EM. 2023. The PMA phorbol ester tumor promoter increases canonical Wnt signaling via macropinocytosis. Cell Image Library. 55765

References

  1. Acebron SP, Karaulanov E, Berger BS, Huang YL, Niehrs C. Mitotic wnt signaling promotes protein stabilization and regulates cell size. Molecular Cell. 2014;54:663–674. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Albrecht LV, Tejeda-Muñoz N, Bui MH, Cicchetto AC, Di Biagio D, Colozza G, Schmid E, Piccolo S, Christofk HR, De Robertis EM. GSK3 Inhibits Macropinocytosis and Lysosomal activity through the Wnt destruction Complex Machinery. Cell Reports. 2020;32:107973. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Albrecht LV, Tejeda-Muñoz N, De Robertis EM. Cell biology of canonical wnt signaling. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2021;37:369–389. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-120319-023657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson CA, Kovar DR, Gardel ML, Winkelman JD. LIM domain proteins in cell mechanobiology. Cytoskeleton. 2021;78:303–311. doi: 10.1002/cm.21677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Azbazdar Y, Tejeda-Munoz N, Monka JC, Dayrit A, Binder G, Ozhan G, De Robertis EM. Addition of exogenous diacylglycerol enhances Wnt/β-catenin signaling through stimulation of macropinocytosis. iScience. 2023;26:108075. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bar-Sagi D, Feramisco JR. Induction of membrane ruffling and fluid-phase pinocytosis in quiescent fibroblasts by ras proteins. Science. 1986;233:1061–1068. doi: 10.1126/science.3090687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Berenblum I. The cocarcinogenic action of croton resin 1. Cancer Research. 1941;1:44–48. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bhatia N, Spiegelman VS. Activation of Wnt/beta-catenin/TCF signaling in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Molecular Carcinogenesis. 2005;42:213–221. doi: 10.1002/mc.20077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Biechele TL, Moon RT. Assaying beta-catenin/TCF transcription with beta-catenin/TCF transcription-based reporter constructs. Methods in Molecular Biology. 2008;468:99–110. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-249-6_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Capecci J, Forgac M. The Function of Vacuolar ATPase (V-ATPase) a subunit isoforms in invasiveness of MCF10a and MCF10CA1a Human Breast Cancer Cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2013;288:32731–32741. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.503771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cardone RA, Casavola V, Reshkin SJ. The role of disturbed pH dynamics and the Na+/H+ exchanger in metastasis. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2005;5:786–795. doi: 10.1038/nrc1713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Chaturvedi A, Hoffman LM, Welm AL, Lessnick SL, Beckerle MC. The EWS/FLI Oncogene drives changes in Cellular Morphology, Adhesion, and Migration in Ewing Sarcoma. Genes & Cancer. 2012;3:102–116. doi: 10.1177/1947601912457024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chuang HH, Zhen YY, Tsai YC, Chuang CH, Hsiao M, Huang MS, Yang CJ. FAK in Cancer: from Mechanisms to Therapeutic Strategies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2022;23:1726. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Colozza G, De Robertis EM. Maternal syntabulin is required for dorsal axis formation and is a germ plasm component in Xenopus. Differentiation; Research in Biological Diversity. 2014;88:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Colozza G, Jami-Alahmadi Y, Dsouza A, Tejeda-Muñoz N, Albrecht LV, Sosa EA, Wohlschlegel JA, De Robertis EM. Wnt-inducible LRP6-APEX2 interacting proteins identify ESCRT machinery and Trk-fused gene as components of the Wnt signaling pathway. Scientific Reports. 2020;10:21555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-78019-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Commisso C, Davidson SM, Soydaner-Azeloglu RG, Parker SJ, Kamphorst JJ, Hackett S, Grabocka E, Nofal M, Drebin JA, Thompson CB, Rabinowitz JD, Metallo CM, Vander Heiden MG, Bar-Sagi D. Macropinocytosis of protein is an amino acid supply route in Ras-transformed cells. Nature. 2013;497:633–637. doi: 10.1038/nature12138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Commisso C, Flinn RJ, Bar-Sagi D. Determining the macropinocytic index of cells through a quantitative image-based assay. Nature Protocols. 2014;9:182–192. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Egami Y, Taguchi T, Maekawa M, Arai H, Araki N. Small GTPases and phosphoinositides in the regulatory mechanisms of macropinosome formation and maturation. Frontiers in Physiology. 2014;5:374. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Escola J-M, Kleijmeer MJ, Stoorvogel W, Griffith JM, Yoshie O, Geuze HJ. Selective Enrichment of Tetraspan Proteins on the internal vesicles of Multivesicular Endosomes and on Exosomes Secreted by Human B-lymphocytes. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1998;273:20121–20127. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.32.20121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fang X, Yu S, Tanyi JL, Lu Y, Woodgett JR, Mills GB. Convergence of Multiple Signaling Cascades at Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3: EDG Receptor-Mediated Phosphorylation and Inactivation by Lysophosphatidic Acid through a Protein Kinase C-Dependent Intracellular Pathway. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2002;22:2099–2110. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.7.2099-2110.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Faux MC, Ross JL, Meeker C, Johns T, Ji H, Simpson RJ, Layton MJ, Burgess AW. Restoration of full-length adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) protein in a colon cancer cell line enhances cell adhesion. Journal of Cell Science. 2004;117:427–439. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fehrenbacher N, Jäättelä M. Lysosomes as targets for cancer therapy. Cancer Research. 2005;65:2993–2995. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fujii M, Kawai K, Egami Y, Araki N. Dissecting the roles of RAC1 activation and deactivation in macropinocytosis using microscopic photo-manipulation. Scientific Reports. 2013;3:2385. doi: 10.1038/srep02385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Galluzzi L, Spranger S, Fuchs E, López-Soto A. WNT Signaling in Cancer Immunosurveillance. Trends in Cell Biology. 2019;29:44–65. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.08.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Garvalov BK, Higgins TE, Sutherland JD, Zettl M, Scaplehorn N, Köcher T, Piddini E, Griffiths G, Way M. The conformational state of TES regulates its zyxin-dependent recruitment to focal adhesions. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2003;161:33–39. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200211015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankov R, Yamada KM. Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix and the cytoskeleton. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2001;2:793–805. doi: 10.1038/35099066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gocheva V, Joyce JA. Cysteine cathepsins and the cutting edge of cancer invasion. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:60–64. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.1.3669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Goode N, Hughes K, Woodgett JR, Parker PJ. Differential regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta by protein kinase C isotypes. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992;267:16878–16882. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)41866-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Haigler HT, McKanna JA, Cohen S. Rapid stimulation of pinocytosis in human carcinoma cells A-431 by epidermal growth factor. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1979;83:82–90. doi: 10.1083/jcb.83.1.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hall A. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science. 1998;279:509–514. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hampsch RA, Shee K, Bates D, Lewis LD, Désiré L, Leblond B, Demidenko E, Stefan K, Huang YH, Miller TW. Therapeutic sensitivity to Rac GTPase inhibition requires consequential suppression of mTORC1, AKT, and MEK signaling in breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:21806–21817. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hinton A, Sennoune SR, Bond S, Fang M, Reuveni M, Sahagian GG, Jay D, Martinez-Zaguilan R, Forgac M. Function of a subunit isoforms of the V-ATPase in pH homeostasis and in vitro invasion of MDA-MB231 human breast cancer cells. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2009;284:16400–16408. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M901201200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Jamieson C, Lui C, Brocardo MG, Martino-Echarri E, Henderson BR. RAC1 augments Wnt signaling by stimulating β-catenin-lymphoid enhancer factor-1 complex assembly independent of β-catenin nuclear import. Journal of Cell Science. 2015;128:3933–3946. doi: 10.1242/jcs.167742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Jeong WJ, Yoon J, Park JC, Lee SH, Lee SH, Kaduwal S, Kim H, Yoon JB, Choi KY. Ras stabilization through aberrant activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling promotes intestinal tumorigenesis. Science Signaling. 2012;5:ra30. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2002242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kadrmas JL, Beckerle MC. The LIM domain: from the cytoskeleton to the nucleus. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2004;5:920–931. doi: 10.1038/nrm1499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kao KR, Masui Y, Elinson RP. Lithium-induced respecification of pattern in Xenopus laevis embryos. Nature. 1986;322:371–373. doi: 10.1038/322371a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell. 1996;87:159–170. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81333-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kirkegaard T, Jäättelä M. Lysosomal involvement in cell death and cancer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2009;1793:746–754. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2008.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Koivusalo M, Welch C, Hayashi H, Scott CC, Kim M, Alexander T, Touret N, Hahn KM, Grinstein S. Amiloride inhibits macropinocytosis by lowering submembranous pH and preventing RAC1 and Cdc42 signaling. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2010;188:547–563. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200908086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kolwijck E, Massuger LFAG, Thomas CMG, Span PN, Krasovec M, Kos J, Sweep FCGJ. Cathepsins B, L and cystatin C in cyst fluid of ovarian tumors. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 2010;136:771–778. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0716-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kroemer G, Jäättelä M. Lysosomes and autophagy in cell death control. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2005;5:886–897. doi: 10.1038/nrc1738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lambies G, Commisso C. Macropinocytosis and cancer: From tumor stress to signaling pathways. Sub-Cellular Biochemistry. 2022;98:15–40. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94004-1_2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lawrence RE, Zoncu R. The lysosome as a cellular centre for signalling, metabolism and quality control. Nature Cell Biology. 2019;21:133–142. doi: 10.1038/s41556-018-0244-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Leibovitz A, Stinson JC, McCombs WB, McCoy CE. Classification of human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell lines. Cancer Research. 1976;36:4562–4569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Loh KM, van Amerongen R, Nusse R. Generating cellular diversity and spatial form: Wnt signaling and the evolution of multicellular animals. Developmental Cell. 2016;38:643–655. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. MacDonald BT, Tamai K, He X. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling: components, mechanisms, and diseases. Developmental Cell. 2009;17:9–26. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. McMahon AP, Moon RT. Ectopic expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 in Xenopus embryos leads to duplication of the embryonic axis. Cell. 1989;58:1075–1084. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90506-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Niehrs C. The complex world of WNT receptor signalling. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2012;13:767–779. doi: 10.1038/nrm3470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Nishizuka Y. The role of protein kinase C in cell surface signal transduction and tumour promotion. Nature. 1984;308:693–698. doi: 10.1038/308693a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nix DA, Beckerle MC. Nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling of the focal contact protein, zyxin: A potential mechanism for communication between sites of cell adhesion and the nucleus. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1997;138:1139–1147. doi: 10.1083/jcb.138.5.1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling, Disease, and Emerging Therapeutic Modalities. Cell. 2017;169:985–999. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Ohno S, Nishizuka Y. Protein kinase C isotypes and their specific functions: prologue. Journal of Biochemistry. 2002;132:509–511. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a003249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Perona R, Serrano R. Increased pH and tumorigenicity of fibroblasts expressing a yeast proton pump. Nature. 1988;334:438–440. doi: 10.1038/334438a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ramirez C, Hauser AD, Vucic EA, Bar-Sagi D. Plasma membrane V-ATPase controls oncogenic RAS-induced macropinocytosis. Nature. 2019;576:477–481. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1831-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Redelman-Sidi G, Binyamin A, Gaeta I, Palm W, Thompson CB, Romesser PB, Lowe SW, Bagul M, Doench JG, Root DE, Glickman MS. The canonical wnt pathway drives macropinocytosis in cancer. Cancer Research. 2018;78:4658–4670. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rous P, Kidd JG. Conditional neoplasms and subthreshold neoplastic states: A study of the tar tumors of rabbits. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1941;73:365–390. doi: 10.1084/jem.73.3.365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Schwarz M, Münzel PA, Braeuning A. Non-melanoma skin cancer in mouse and man. Archives of Toxicology. 2013;87:783–798. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0998-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Segditsas S, Tomlinson I. Colorectal cancer and genetic alterations in the Wnt pathway. Oncogene. 2006;25:7531–7537. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Su Z, Song J, Wang Z, Zhou L, Xia Y, Yu S, Sun Q, Liu SS, Zhao L, Li S, Wei L, Carson DA, Lu D. Tumor promoter TPA activates Wnt/β-catenin signaling in a casein kinase 1-dependent manner. PNAS. 2018;115:E7522–E7531. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802422115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Swanson JA. Phorbol esters stimulate macropinocytosis and solute flow through macrophages. Journal of Cell Science. 1989;94 ( Pt 1):135–142. doi: 10.1242/jcs.94.1.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Taelman VF, Dobrowolski R, Plouhinec J-L, Fuentealba LC, Vorwald PP, Gumper I, Sabatini DD, De Robertis EM. Wnt signaling requires sequestration of glycogen synthase kinase 3 inside multivesicular endosomes. Cell. 2010;143:1136–1148. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Takai Y, Kishimoto A, Iwasa Y, Kawahara Y, Mori T, Nishizuka Y. Calcium-dependent activation of a multifunctional protein kinase by membrane phospholipids. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1979;254:3692–3695. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)50638-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Tatarelli C, Linnenbach A, Mimori K, Croce CM. Characterization of the human TESTIN gene localized in the FRA7G region at 7q31.2. Genomics. 2000;68:1–12. doi: 10.1006/geno.2000.6272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Tejeda-Muñoz N, Albrecht LV, Bui MH, De Robertis EM. Wnt canonical pathway activates macropinocytosis and lysosomal degradation of extracellular proteins. PNAS. 2019;116:10402–10411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903506116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Tejeda-Muñoz N, De Robertis EM. Lysosomes are required for early dorsal signaling in the Xenopus embryo. PNAS. 2022a;119:e2201008119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201008119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tejeda-Muñoz N, De Robertis EM. Wnt, GSK3, and Macropinocytosis. Sub-Cellular Biochemistry. 2022b;98:169–187. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-94004-1_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Tejeda-Muñoz N, Morselli M, Moriyama Y, Sheladiya P, Pellegrini M, De Robertis EM. Canonical Wnt signaling induces focal adhesion and Integrin beta-1 endocytosis. iScience. 2022c;25:104123. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Tobias ES, Hurlstone AF, MacKenzie E, McFarlane R, Black DM. The TES gene at 7q31.1 is methylated in tumours and encodes a novel growth-suppressing LIM domain protein. Oncogene. 2001;20:2844–2853. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Vinyoles M, Del Valle-Pérez B, Curto J, Viñas-Castells R, Alba-Castellón L, García de Herreros A, Duñach M. Multivesicular GSK3 Sequestration upon Wnt Signaling Is Controlled by p120-Catenin/Cadherin Interaction with LRP5/6. Molecular Cell. 2014;53:444–457. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Weinberg RA, Weinberg RA. The Biology of Cancer. Taylor & Francis Group; 2007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wu X, Tu X, Joeng KS, Hilton MJ, Williams DA, Long F. Rac1 activation controls nuclear localization of beta-catenin during canonical Wnt signaling. Cell. 2008;133:340–353. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yoshida S, Pacitto R, Inoki K, Swanson J. Macropinocytosis, mTORC1 and cellular growth control. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2018;75:1227–1239. doi: 10.1007/s00018-017-2710-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhitomirsky B, Assaraf YG. Lysosomes as mediators of drug resistance in cancer. Drug Resistance Updates. 2016;24:23–33. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2015.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife assessment

Christof Niehrs 1

Altogether, the strength of this important study is that it provides compelling evidence in several biological models, including Xenopus embryos, that Wnt3a increases macropinocytosis and that PMA increases this cellular response. This novel link between Wnt, focal adhesions, lysosomes, and macropinocytosis will be very interesting for cell and tumor biologists. In future work, it will be important to identify the underlying mechanism, i.e., the molecular node whereby this interaction occurs.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Anonymous

In this study, the authors utilise different chemical inhibitors and celular markers to examine the roles of macropinocytosis in WNT signalling activation in development (Xenopus), cell culture (3T3 cells) and cancer (CRC sections). Furthermore, they investigate the effect of the inflammation inducer Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) in WNT signalling activation through macropinocytosis. The authors show (1) that PMA induces macropinocytosis-dependent WNT signalling activation, and (2) that CRC development correlates with increased levels and co-localisation of macropinocytosis components and b-catenin.

I found the analyses and conclusions compelling. Additional epistatic analyses could be done in the future to further disentangle the roles of macropinocytosis during WNT signalling activation, especially upon oncogenic alterations (e.g. in APC). The studies on CRC samples open interesting questions for specialists in tumour progression.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Anonymous

Tejeda Muñoz et al. investigate the intersection of Wnt signaling, macropinocytosis, lysosomes, focal adhesions and membrane trafficking in embryogenesis and cancer. Following up on their previous papers, the authors present evidence that PMA enhances Wnt signaling and embryonic patterning through macropinocytosis. Strikingly, PMA and Wnt ligand act synergistically to trigger macropinocytosis in fibroblasts. Proteins that are associated with the endo-lysosomal pathway and Wnt signaling are co-increased in colorectal cancer samples, consistent with their pro-tumorigenic action. The function of macropinocytosis is not well understood in most physiological contexts, and its role in Wnt signaling is intriguing. The authors use a wide range of models - Xenopus embryos, cancer cells in culture and in xenografts and patient samples to investigate several endolysosomal processes that appear to act upstream or downstream of Wnt. This broad approach has the downside that results are often validated only in a subset of biological systems and that experiments tend to lack of mechanistic depth. The connections between PMA, Wnt signaling, Rac stabilization, FAK signaling and macropinocytosis remain unclear. Nevertheless, the results provide intriguing insights into a novel connection of the tumor promoting agent PMA and Wnt signaling in development and cancer.

The authors demonstrate striking, additive effects of Wnt3a and PMA in inducing macropinocytosis in 3T3 cells (Fig. 1 K-P). In the APC-mutant colorectal cancer line SW480, the authors show that PMA treatment increases macropinocytosis (Fig. S1). While these data provide additional confirmation that PMA can trigger macropinocytosis, they do not address the role of Wnt signaling directly. This could be done by restoring APC function in SW480 cells, or by ectopically activating Wnt signaling in a CRC cell line that lacks activating mutations in the Wnt pathway. These experiments would help to strengthen the cancer angle and validate the connection between Wnt signaling and PMA in macropinocytosis induction in additional cell lines.

The authors conclude that PMA enhances Wnt signaling based on experiments in Xenopus embryos where co-treatment with PMA and the Wnt activator LiCl increases Wnt target gene expression. This is an interesting observation, but large parts of the paper focus on mammalian cells / cancer cells. It would be important to demonstrate the ability of PMA to enhance Wnt signaling in these contexts as well.

eLife. 2023 Oct 30;12:RP89141. doi: 10.7554/eLife.89141.3.sa3

Author Response

Nydia Tejeda-Munoz 1, Yagmur Azbazdar 2, Julia Monka 3, Grace Binder 4, Alex Dayrit 5, Raul Ayala 6, Neil O'Brien 7, Edward M De Robertis 8

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

In this ms, Tejeda-Muñoz and colleagues examine the roles of macropinocytosis in WNT signalling activation in development (Xenopus) and cancer (CRC sections, cell lines and xenograft experiments). Furthermore, they investigate the effect of the inflammation inducer Phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) in WNT signalling activation through macropinocytosis. They propose that macropinocytosis is a key driver of WNT signalling, including upon oncogenic activation, with relevance in cancer progression.

I found the analyses and conclusions of the relevance of macropinocytosis in WNT signalling compelling, notably upon constitutive activation both during development and in CRC.

Thank you.

However, I think this manuscript only partially characterises the effects of PMA in WNT signalling, largely due to a lack of an epistatic characterisation of PMA roles in Wnt activation. For example: 1- The authors show that PMA cooperate with (1) GSK3 inhibition in Xenopus to promote WNT activation, and (2) (possibly) with APCmut in SW480 to induce b-cat and FAK accumulation. To sustain a specific functional interaction between WNT and PMA, the effects should be tested through additional epistatic experiments. For example, does PMA cooperate with Wnt8 in axis duplication analyses? Does PMA cooperate with any other WNT alteration in CRC or other cell lines? Importantly, does APC re-introduction in SW480 rescue the effect of PMA? Such analyses could be critical to determine specificity of the functional interactions between WNT and PMA. This question could be addressed by performing classical epistatic analyses in cell lines (CRC or HEK) focusing on WNT activity, and by including rescue experiments targeting the WNT pathway downstream of the effects e.g., dnTCF, APC re- introduction, etc.

We agree that there was need for additional direct evidence of functional interactions of between macropinocytosis, Wnt signaling, and PMA beyond the previously provided target gene assays in Xenopus (now shown in Figure 1I) and luciferase assays in cultured cells (Figure 1J) which used LiCl and inhibition by Bafilomycin. We therefore carried out a new experiment using 3T3 cells, now shown in Figure 1K-P. Wnt3a protein increased the uptake of TMR-dextran 70 kDa, and PMA enhanced this response. The macropinocytosis inhibitor EIPA blocked induction of macropinocytosis by Wnt3a and PMA. These results were quantitated in Figure 1Q. We think this new experiment strengthens the main conclusion that the tumor promoter PMA increases macropinocytosis. Thank you.

1. While the epistatic analyses of WNT and macropinocytosis are clear in frog, the causal link in CRC cells is contained to b-catenin accumulation. While is clear that macropinocytosis reduces spheroid growth in SW480, the lack of rescue experiments with e.g., constitutive active b-catenin or any other WNT perturbation or/and APC re-introduction, limit the conclusions of this experiment.

We now provide new experiments in 3T3 cells treated with LiCl, overexpression of constitutively-active β-catenin and constitutively-active Lrp6 (Figure 4, panels I through L’’); the new results indicate that Wnt signaling activation increases protein levels of the macropinocytosis activator Rac1.

Minor comments:

3- Different compounds targeting membrane trafficking are used to rescue modes of WNT activation (Wnt8 vs LiCl) in Xenopus.

The main goal of our experiments was to test the requirement of membrane trafficking for tumor promoter activity through the Wnt pathway. We therefore used PMA, and a variety of inhibitors such as EIPA (Na+/H+ exchanger, Figure 1I and Figure 3D), Bafilomycin A (Figure 1H), DN-Rab7 (Figure 3G) and EHT1864 (a Rac1 inhibitor, Figure 4G). One could argue that using a wide variety of membrane trafficking inhibitors is a plus.

4- The abstract does not state the results in CRC/xenografts

We have added a sentence to the abstract.

5- Labels of Figure 2E might be swap

Thank you for detecting this error, we now label the last two columns in Figure 2E correctly.

6- Figure 4i,j, 6 and s4 rely on qualitative analyses instead of quantifications, which underscores their evaluation. On the other hand, the detailed quantifications in Figure S3A-D strongly support the images of Figure 5

The quantifications of the previous Figure 4I-J supported the data in the initial reviewed preprint, shown in Author response image 1:

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

However, these data have now been deleted from this version to make space for new experiments showing the stabilization of Rac1 by stabilized β-catenin and CA-LRP6. Quantifications in Figure 6C-F’’ are not shown because they represent changes in subcellular localization, but a western blot is provided in Figure 6B. Quantifications for Figure 6H-I’’ are shown in panel 6G. Supplemental Figure S4 already has 24 panels so introducing quantifications would be unwieldy.

Thank you for the thoughtful comments.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Tejeda Muñoz et al. investigate the intersection of Wnt signaling, macropinocytosis, lysosomes, focal adhesions and membrane trafficking in embryogenesis and cancer. Following up on their previous papers, the authors present evidence that PMA enhances Wnt signaling and embryonic patterning through macropinocytosis. Proteins that are associated with the endo-lysosomal pathway and Wnt signaling are co-increased in colorectal cancer samples, consistent with their pro-tumorigenic action. The function of macropinocytosis is not well understood in most physiological contexts, and its role in Wnt signaling is intriguing. The authors use a wide range of models - Xenopus embryos, cancer cells in culture and in xenografts and patient samples to investigate several endolysosomal processes that appear to act upstream or downstream of Wnt. A downside of this broad approach is a lack of mechanistic depth. In particular, few experiments monitor macropinocytosis directly, and macropinocytosis manipulations have pleiotropic effects that are open alternative interpretations. Several experiments are confirmatory of previous findings; the manuscript could be improved by focusing on the novel relationship between PMA-induced macropinocytosis and better support these conclusions with additional experiments.

New additional experiments focusing on the role of PMA are now provided.

The authors use a range of inhibitors that suppress macropinosome formation (EIPA, Bafilomycin A1, Rac1 inhibition). However, these are not specific macropinocytosis inhibitors (EIPA blocks an Na+/H+ exchanger, which is highly toxic and perturbs cellular pH balance; Bafilomycin blocks the V-ATPase, which has essential functions in the Golgi, endosomes and lysosomes; Rac1 signals through multiple downstream pathways). A specific macropinocytosis inhibitor does not exist, and it is thus important to support key conclusions with dextran uptake experiments.

We used a wide range of inhibitors because the main idea is to show that membrane trafficking is important in Wnt and PMA activity. We would like to point out that the current experimental definition in the field of macropinocytosis, despite any caveats, is the ability to block dextran uptake with EIPA. Because inhibitors may not be entirely specific, we think using a broad approach to target membrane trafficking might be a plus. We now provide in Figure 1K-Q a new experiment showing that Wnt3a protein treatment increases dextran uptake and PMA stimulates this macropinocytosis in 3T3 cells. EIPA inhibited dextran macropinocytosis in the presence of Wnt and PMA (Figure 1N and 1Q). We also provide a time-lapse video of the rapid macropinocytic vesicles induction by PMA in SW480 CRC cells in which the plasma membrane is tagged (Supplemental Movie S1).

The title states that PMA increases Wnt signaling through macropinocytosis. However, the mechanistic relationship between PMA-induced macropinocytosis and Wnt signaling is not well supported. The authors refer to a classical paper that demonstrates macropinocytosis induction by PMA in macrophages (PMID: 2613767). Unlike most cell types, macrophages display growth factor-induced and constitutive macropinocytic pathways (PMID: 30967001). It would thus be important to demonstrate macropinocytosis induction by PMA experimentally in Xenopus embryos / cancer cells. Does treatment with EIPA / Bafilomycin / Rac1i decrease the dextran signal in embryos? In macrophages, the PKC inhibitor Calphostin C blocks macropinocytosis induction by PMA (PMID: 25688212). Does Calphostin C block macropinocytosis in embryos / cancer cells? Do the various combinations of Wnts / Wnt agonists and PMA have additive or synergistic effects on dextran uptake? If the authors want to conclude that PMA activates Wnt signaling, it would also be important to demonstrate the effect of PMA on Wnt target gene expression.

We now provide a new experiment showing macropinocytosis induction of PMA experimentally in cancer cells. CRC SW480 cells, despite having a mutant APC, are able to respond to PMA by further increasing TMR-dextran 70 kDa uptake over background within 1 hour (now shown in Figure S1):

Investigating PKC and Calphostin C is outside of goals of this paper. With respect to final the point on the effect of PMA on Wnt target gene expression, this was shown in the context of the Xenopus embryo in Figure 1I (Siamois and Xnr3 are direct targets of Wnt).

Author response image 2.

Author response image 2.

The experiments concerning macropinosome formation in Xenopus embryos are not very convincing. Macropinosomes are circular vesicles whose size in mammalian cells ranges from 0.2 - 10 µM (PMID: 18612320). The TMR-dextran signal in Fig. 1A does not obviously label structures that look like macropinosomes; rather the signal is diffusely localized throughout the dorsal compartment, which could be extracellular (or perhaps cytosolic). I have similar concerns for the cell culture experiments, where dextran uptake is only shown for SW480 spheroids in Fig. S2. It would be helpful to quantify size of the circular structures (is this consistent with macropinosomes?).

In response, we have deleted the TMR experiments in Xenopus embryos; they will be reinvestigated at a later time. With respect to macropinosome sizes in cultured cells, they are indeed large at the plasma membrane level (see new Supplemental Movie S1), but rapidly decrease in size once dextran is concentrated inside the cell. This can be visualized in the new experiments showing dextran vesicles in Supplemental Figure S1J-K and Figure 1K-P.

In Fig. 4I - J, the dramatic decrease in b-catenin and especially in Rac1 after overnight EIPA treatment is rather surprising. How do the authors explain these findings? Is there any evidence that macropinocytosis stabilizes Rac1? Could this be another effect of EIPA or general toxicity?

We now provide new evidence that Wnt signaling stabilizes Rac1. The old data relying on overnight EIPA treatment has been replaced by new experiments in 3T3 cells showing (i) that LiCl treatment increases levels of Rac1 protein and β-catenin levels (Figure 4I-J’’), (ii) that cells transfected with constitutively active β-catenin-GFP have higher levels of Rac1 than control untransfected cells (Figure 4K-K’’) and (iii) that Rac1 is stabilized in cells transfected with CA-Lrp6-GFP when compared to untransfected cells (Figure4L-L’’).

On a similar note, Fig. 6 K - L the FAK staining in control cells appears to localize to focal adhesions, but in PMA-treated cells is strongly localized throughout the cell. Do the authors have any thoughts on how PMA stabilizes FAK and where the kinase localizes under these conditions? Does PMA treatment increase FAK signaling activity?

The previous Figure 6K-L’’ are now found in Supplementary Figure S4, panels C-D’’. The result is that FAK is greatly stabilized by overnight incubation with PMA. How this achieved is unknown, perhaps the result of increased macropinocytosis, but we do not wish to speculate in the main manuscript. We have not measured FAK activity, but the FAK inhibitor PF-00562271 strongly decreased β-catenin signaling by GSK3 inhibition (Figure 6J) and has strong effects in neural development that mimic inhibition of the early Wnt signal (new experiments shown in Figure 6K-L’’’). The results suggest that FAK activity affects Wnt signaling and dorsal development; the molecular mechanism of this interaction is unknown but worthy of future studies.

The tumor stainings in Figure 5 are interesting but correlative. Pak1 functions in multiple cellular processes and Pak1 levels are not a direct marker for macropinocytosis. In the discussion, the authors discuss evidence that the V-ATPase translocates to the plasma membrane in cancer to drive extracellular acidification. To which extent does the Voa3 staining reflect lysosomal V-ATPase? Do the authors have controls for antibody specificity?

It is true that Pak1 has multiple functions, yet it is essential for the actin machinery that drives macropinocytosis. We have now rephrased the discussion to say “Rac1 is an upstream regulator of the Pak1 kinase required for the actin machinery that drive macropinocytosis (Redelman-Sidi et al., 2018)”. We also explain that: “V-ATPase has been associated with acidification of the extracellular milieu in tumors (Capecci and Forgac, 2013; Hinton et al., 2009; Perona and Serrano, 1988). Extracellular acidification is probably due to increased numbers of lysosomes which are exocytosed, since V0a3 was located within the cytoplasm in advanced cancer or xenografts in mice (Figures 5I and S3I)”. The antibody we used for V0a3 is highly specific and has been used widely (Ramirez et al., 2019).

Reviewer #3 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Tejeda-Munoz examines signaling by Wnt and macropinocytosis in Xenopus embryos and colon cancer cells. A major problem with the study is the extensive use of pleiotropic inhibitors as "specific" inhibitors of macropinocytosis in embryos. It is true that BafA and EIPA block macropinocytosis, but they do many other things as well. A major target of EIPA is the NheI Na+/proton transporter, which also regulates invasive structures (podosomes, invadopodia) which could have major roles in development. Similarly, Baf1 will disrupt lysosomes and the endocytic system, which secondary effects on mTOR signaling and growth factor receptor trafficking. The authors cannot assume that processes inhibited by these drugs demonstrate a role of macropinocytosis. While correlations in tumor samples between increased expression of PAK1 and V0a3 and decreased expression of GSK3 are consistent with a link between macropinocytosis and Wnt-driven malignancy, the cell and embryo-based experiments do not convincingly make this connection. Finally, the data on FAK and TES are not well integrated with the rest of the manuscript.

The criticism that drugs are not entirely specific is a valid one. Our approach of using a variety of drugs such as EIPA, BafA, EHT1864 or FAK inhibitor PF-00562271 all point to the main conclusion that the membrane trafficking is important in signaling by Wnt and the action of the tumor promoter PMA. The data on FAK, TES and focal adhesions have been better integrated in the manuscript and new experiments on the effect of FAK inhibitor in embryonic dorsal development are now provided (Figure 6K-L’’’).

1. The data in Fig. 1A do not convincingly demonstrate macropinocytosis - it is impossible to tell what is being labeled by the dextran.

In response, we have deleted the TMR-dextran experiments in Xenopus embryos; they will be reported at a later time.

1. The data in Fig. 2 do not make sense. LiCL2 bypasses the WNT activation pathway by inhibiting GSK3. If subsequent treatment with BafA blocks the effects of GSK3 inhibition, then BafrA is doing something unrelated to Wnt activation, whose target is the inhibition/sequestration of GSK3. While BafA might block GSK3 sequestration by inhibiting MVB function, it should have no effect on the inhibition of GSK3 by LiCl2.

We now explain in the main text describing Figure 2 in the results, the initial effect of GSK3 inhibition by LiCl is to trigger macropinocytosis (Albrecht et al., 2020). If the downstream acidification of lysosomes is inhibited, then the brief treatment with LiCl (7 min at 32-cell stage) has no effect (LiCl 1st+BafA 2nd, Figure 2H). BafA inhibits lysosomal acidification at 32-cell stage resulting in ventralization, but the effect of brief BafA treatment can be reversed by inducing membrane trafficking by LiCl (BafA 1st+LiCl 2nd, Figure 2C). The labelling of the figure panels C and H has been modified to indicate this is an order-of-addition experiment. These order-of-addition experiments strongly support the proposal that endogenous lysosomal activity is required to generate the initial endogenous Wnt signal that takes place at the 32-cell stage of development (Tejeda-Muñoz and De Robertis, 2022a).

1. The effect of EHT on MP in SW480 cells is not clearly related to what is happening in the embryos. The nearly total loss of staining for Rac and β-catenin after overnight EIPA does not implicate MP in protein stability - critical controls for cell viability and overall protein turnover are absent. Inhibition of WNT signaling might be expected to enhance β-catenin turnover, but the effect on Rac1 is surprising. A more quantitative analysis by western blotting is required.

The results from SW480 cells inhibition by EIPA have been replaced in Figure 4. We now provide new evidence in 3T3 cells that Wnt signaling stabilizes Rac1. The old data relying on EIPA treatment in SW480 cells has been replaced by new experiments in 3T3 cells showing (i) that LiCl treatment increases levels of Rac1 protein and β-catenin levels (Figure 4I-J’’), (ii) that cells transfected with constitutively active β-catenin-GFP have higher levels of Rac1 than control untransfected cells (Figure 4K-K’’) and (iii) that Rac1 is stabilized in cells transfected with CA-Lrp6-GFP when compared to untransfected cells (Figure4L-L’’). In the original EIPA experiment in SW480 cells, now deleted from this version of the manuscript, we tested the cell viability using a Vi-Cell Beckman-Coulter Viability Analyzer and found that cells were 96-98% viable but proliferation was strongly decreased after 12 h of EIPA treatment. The effect of brief Rac1 inhibition (7 min) in decreasing dorsal development in embryos at the critical 32-cell stage is robust (Figure 4A-C). In addition, coinjection of EHT is able to entirely block the effects of microinjected xWnt8 mRNA (compare Figure 4E to 4G, see also Figure 4H), suggesting that Rac1 is required for Wnt signaling. Quantitative target gene expression analysis is provided for the embryo experiments (Figure 4C and 4H); for the stabilization of Rac1 by Wnt we are not providing quantitative measurements, but found similar results with 3 independent approaches (LiCl, CA-β-catenin and CA-Lrp6).

1. The data on FAK inhibition and TES trafficking are poorly integrated with the rest of the paper.

We attempted to better relate the TES trafficking to our previous paper showing that canonical Wnt signaling induces focal adhesion and Integrin-β1 endocytosis. We now write in the results: “We have previously reported a crosstalk between the Wnt and focal adhesion (FA) signaling pathways. Wnt3a treatment rapidly led to the endocytosis of Integrin β1 and of multiple focal adhesion proteins into MVBs (Tejeda-Muñoz et al., 2022). FAs link the actin cytoskeleton with the extracellular matrix (Figure 6A), and we now investigated whether FA activity is affected by Wnt signaling, PMA treatment and CRC progression”.

Reviewer #3 (Recommendations For The Authors):

The reliance on pleiotropic inhibitors is a weakness and should be supplemented by genetic approaches to inhibit macropinocytosis.

We agree, but that would be outside of the scope of this study.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Citations

    1. Tejeda-Muñoz N, Azbazdar Y, Monka J, Binder G, Dayrit A, Ayala R, O'Brien N, De Robertis EM. 2023. The PMA phorbol ester tumor promoter increases canonical Wnt signaling via macropinocytosis. Cell Image Library. 55765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 6—source data 1. Original files with the uncropped western blots used in Figure 6B.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    Data have been deposited in the Cell Image Library (CIL): http://cellimagelibrary.org/groups/55765.

    The following dataset was generated:

    Tejeda-Muñoz N, Azbazdar Y, Monka J, Binder G, Dayrit A, Ayala R, O'Brien N, De Robertis EM. 2023. The PMA phorbol ester tumor promoter increases canonical Wnt signaling via macropinocytosis. Cell Image Library. 55765


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES