Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 27;46(11):1621–1631. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03550-7

Table 3.

Results of the objective image analysis comparing the contrast-to-noise ratio of the lesions’ center and normal liver parenchyma in the biopsy image

CNR: center of lesion vs. liver CI VMI 40 VMI 50 VMI 60 VMI 70 VMI 80 VMI 90 VMI 100 VMI 110 VMI 120
pat #
1 0.04 1.12 0.54 0.16 0.08 0.25 0.35 0.42 0.48 0.51
2 0.02 2.72 1.63 0.79 0.34 0.01 0.18 0.35 0.43 0.49
3 2.78 3.28 3.56 3.69 3.79 3.86 3.85 3.85 3.85 3.85
4 3.39 6.00 5.11 4.55 4.19 3.94 3.79 3.71 3.62 3.55
5 3.57 11.40 8.89 6.73 5.29 4.30 3.56 3.10 2.74 2.46
6 3.06 4.46 4.05 3.88 3.71 3.56 3.51 3.44 3.41 3.41
7 0.86 1.54 0.31 0.45 0.88 1.20 1.39 1.49 1.59 1.69
8 4.41 7.32 6.17 5.38 4.95 4.71 4.47 4.36 4.17 4.19
9 0.84 2.33 1.83 1.50 1.27 1.14 1.03 0.97 0.92 0.88
10 1.55 4.96 3.54 2.54 1.91 1.49 1.22 1.05 0.91 0.81
11 0.92 0.37 0.94 1.35 1.59 1.74 1.83 1.91 1.97 2.00
12 5.91 8.93 8.10 7.46 7.09 6.80 6.72 6.49 6.48 6.37
13 2.71 2.72 2.83 2.85 2.86 2.87 2.88 2.88 2.86 2.88
14 0.28 1.78 0.98 0.43 0.10 0.12 0.27 0.37 0.44 0.49
15 0.42 2.43 1.10 0.27 0.26 0.60 0.81 0.96 1.06 1.14
16 0.72 0.78 0.80 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.79 0.80 0.80 0.80
17 0.42 2.46 1.56 0.98 0.61 0.37 0.22 0.11 0.03 0.02
18 1.42 1.02 0.11 0.86 1.32 1.61 1.79 1.93 2.03 2.10
19 0.04 0.50 0.35 0.26 0.20 0.16 0.14 0.12 0.11 0.10
20 0.16 1.91 0.89 0.26 0.13 0.39 0.53 0.66 0.73 0.78
CNR: center of lesion vs. liver VMI 130 VMI 140 VMI 150 VMI 160 VMI 170 VMI 180 VMI 190 VMI 200 VNC CNRmax/CNRconv
pat #
1 0.53 0.56 0.58 0.58 0.6 0.6 0.62 0.62 0.68 28
2 0.56 0.64 0.71 0.54 0.71 0.65 0.71 0.71 0.90 136
3 3.91 3.87 3.94 3.85 3.90 3.94 3.92 3.87 3.94 1.4
4 3.52 3.51 3.45 3.46 3.42 3.41 3.44 3.44 3.28 1.8
5 2.30 2.16 2.04 1.97 1.88 1.83 1.72 1.70 1.74 3.2
6 3.40 3.38 3.33 3.38 3.31 3.30 3.36 3.35 3.25 1.5
7 1.66 1.70 1.81 1.76 1.85 1.78 1.90 1.83 1.96 2.3
8 4.11 4.10 4.07 3.98 4.02 3.94 3.96 3.98 3.84 1.7
9 0.87 0.84 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.78 0.80 0.80 0.72 2.8
10 0.74 0.70 0.65 0.63 0.58 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.44 3.2
11 2.04 2.02 2.05 2.06 2.06 2.11 2.06 2.09 2.16 2.3
12 6.36 6.24 6.38 6.20 6.29 6.31 6.21 6.22 6.17 1.5
13 2.87 2.82 2.89 2.82 2.87 2.87 2.81 2.87 2.88 1.1
14 0.52 0.56 0.58 0.59 0.61 0.62 0.63 0.63 0.72 6.4
15 1.19 1.24 1.28 1.30 1.32 1.34 1.35 1.36 1.49 5.8
16 0.80 0.78 0.80 0.78 0.81 0.79 0.77 0.79 0.81 1.1
17 0.07 0.10 0.12 0.13 0.16 0.17 0.18 0.20 0.29 5.9
18 2.15 2.20 2.21 2.26 2.27 2.27 2.27 2.33 2.43 1.7
19 0.10 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 12.5
20 0.82 0.85 0.89 0.90 0.93 0.92 0.94 0.96 1.04 11.9

CNR for conventional images (CIs), virtual monoenergetic (VMI) images at 40–200 keV and virtual non-contrast images (VNC) are shown. Results for each patient (1–20) individually as well as the ratio between the highest CNR (CNRmax) and the CNR in the CI (CNRconv) are presented. Highest CNR regarding the visibility of the lesions are highlighted in bold. For patient #3, #13 and #16, no value is highlighted as the CNRmax/CNRconv was lower than 1.5