Table 4.
Intuition scores (%) | vs. Overall control | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | t | p | d | |
Controls | |||||||||
Passive control: | 8.4 | 21.8 | 24.3 | 19.8 | 14.9 | 10.9 | |||
Active control: | 12.2 | 18.5 | 17.1 | 17.6 | 17.1 | 17.6 | |||
Overall control: | 10.3 | 20.2 | 20.6 | 18.7 | 16.0 | 14.3 | |||
Single-response intuition | |||||||||
Intuition recall: | 7.4 | 19.7 | 23.7 | 18.2 | 19.7 | 11.3 | 0.35 | .730 | 0.03 |
Emotion induction: | 2.5 | 7.9 | 15.8 | 26.7 | 29.2 | 17.8 | 5.75 | < .001 | 0.49 |
10s time pressure: | 5.0 | 12.4 | 17.3 | 24.8 | 29.2 | 11.4 | 3.28 | .001 | 0.28 |
5s time pressure: | 5.4 | 5.4 | 20.2 | 30.5 | 24.6 | 13.8 | 4.10 | < .001 | 0.35 |
High cognitive load: | 6.7 | 14.4 | 19.7 | 20.7 | 22.6 | 15.9 | 2.51 | .012 | 0.21 |
Very high cognitive load: | 6.2 | 12.9 | 20.1 | 24.4 | 20.1 | 16.3 | 2.72 | .007 | 0.23 |
Single-response reflection | |||||||||
Reason recall: | 8.4 | 20.3 | 24.8 | 19.3 | 14.9 | 12.4 | -0.21 | .831 | 0.02 |
Reason induction: | 12.1 | 16.5 | 25.2 | 18.0 | 14.1 | 14.1 | -0.37 | .708 | 0.03 |
10s time delay: | 10.9 | 17.3 | 18.3 | 27.7 | 12.9 | 12.9 | 0.03 | .977 | < 0.01 |
20s time delay: | 11.4 | 20.3 | 18.8 | 20.3 | 17.3 | 11.9 | -0.28 | .776 | 0.02 |
Monetary incentives: | 14.3 | 21.7 | 23.2 | 18.7 | 13.8 | 8.4 | -2.37 | .018 | 0.20 |
Decision justification: | 17.2 | 18.7 | 19.1 | 19.6 | 12.4 | 12.9 | -1.66 | .097 | 0.14 |
Short debiasing training: | 22.0 | 20.5 | 21.5 | 17.6 | 9.8 | 8.8 | -3.99 | < .001 | 0.34 |
Long debiasing training: | 30.4 | 24.5 | 20.1 | 14.7 | 7.8 | 2.5 | -7.74 | < .001 | 0.66 |
Standard two-response | |||||||||
5s time pressure: | 6.9 | 13.3 | 14.3 | 25.6 | 26.6 | 13.3 | 3.09 | .002 | 0.27 |
10s time delay: | 13.8 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 25.1 | 20.7 | 11.8 | 0.65 | .514 | 0.06 |
Modified two-response | |||||||||
5s time pressure: | 2.5 | 12.5 | 26.5 | 30.5 | 19.0 | 9.0 | 2.01 | .045 | 0.17 |
Justification + 10s time delay: | 9.5 | 17.5 | 26.0 | 23.5 | 15.5 | 8.0 | -0.81 | .419 | 0.07 |
The table shows the distributions of intuition scores (%) as well as the t-statistics, p-values, and effect sizes (Cohen’s ds) for two-tailed independent samples t-tests comparing the intuition scores for each reflection and intuition manipulation across the single-response and the two-response conditions with the intuition scores in the overall control (i.e., the pool of passive and active control conditions)