Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 17;55(7):3679–3698. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01984-4

Table 5.

Effects on decision error

Error scores (%) vs. Overall control
0 1 2 3 t p d
Controls
  Passive control: 76.7 20.8 2.5 0.0
  Active control: 82.4 14.2 3.4 0.0
  Overall control: 79.6 17.4 3.0 0.0
Single-response intuition
  Intuition recall: 77.8 17.7 3.9 0.5 0.85 .393 0.07
  Emotion induction: 72.8 24.3 3.0 0.0 1.60 .111 0.14
  10s time pressure: 66.8 26.2 6.4 0.5 3.71 < .001 0.32
  5s time pressure: 64.5 28.6 6.9 0.0 4.13 < .001 0.36
  High cognitive load: 81.3 16.8 1.9 0.0 0.66 .511 0.06
  Very high cognitive load: 79.0 17.7 3.4 0.0 0.25 .801 0.02
Single-response reflection
  Reason recall: 86.1 11.4 2.5 0.0 -1.71 .089 0.15
  Reason induction: 78.6 15.5 5.8 0.0 0.87 .383 0.07
  10s time delay: 78.2 18.3 3.5 0.0 0.45 .655 0.04
  20s time delay: 80.2 15.8 3.5 0.5 0.24 .811 0.02
  Monetary incentives: 77.3 20.2 2.0 0.5 0.53 .594 0.05
  Decision justification: 85.7 13.4 1.0 0.0 -2.07 .039 0.18
  Short debiasing training: 76.6 21.0 2.0 0.5 0.71 .481 0.06
  Long debiasing training: 75.0 19.6 4.9 0.5 1.68 .093 0.14
Standard two-response
  5s time pressure: 62.1 32.5 4.9 0.5 4.51 < .001 0.39
  10s time delay: 75.4 21.2 3.5 0.0 1.13 .258 0.10
Modified two-response
  5s time pressure: 56.5 34.0 9.5 0.0 6.22 < .001 0.54
  Justification + 10s time delay: 70.0 24.5 5.0 0.5 2.77 .006 0.24

The table shows the distributions of error scores (%) as well as the t-statistics, p-values, and effect sizes (Cohen’s ds) for two-tailed independent samples t-tests comparing the error scores for each reflection and intuition manipulation across the single-response and the two-response conditions with the error scores in the overall control (i.e., the pool of passive and active control conditions)