Skip to main content
. 2023 Aug 29;16(11):2048–2058. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfad184

Table 2:

Comparing risks of non-COVID-specific outcomes between sotrovimab versus molnupiravir in two cohorts.

OpenSAFELY-UKRR cohort SRR cohort
Outcomes N/events HR (95% CI) for sotrovimab (ref = molnupiravir) P-value N/events HR (95% CI) for sotrovimab (ref = molnupiravir) P-value
28-day all-cause hospitalisation/death 2350/163 993/75
 Model 1 0.65 (0.46–0.92) .016 1.04 (0.61–1.76) .879
 Model 2 0.63 (0.44–0.89) .010 0.80 (0.45–1.43) .455
 Model 3 0.62 (0.43–0.89) .009 0.71 (0.39–1.29) .273
 Model 4 0.60 (0.41–0.85) .004
28-day other-cause hospitalisation/death 2350/130 993/56
 Model 1 0.85 (0.56–1.29) .441 1.29 (0.68–2.40) .426
 Model 2 0.79 (0.52–1.21) .276 0.97 (0.47–1.95) .934
 Model 3 0.76 (0.49–1.16) .205 0.90 (0.44–1.84) .776
 Model 4 0.73 (0.48–1.12) .151

In the OpenSAFELY-UKRR cohort, Model 1 adjusted for age and sex; Model 2 additionally adjusted for high-risk cohort categories, KRT modality and duration; Model 3 additionally adjusted for ethnicity, IMD quintiles, vaccination status, calendar date; and Model 4 additionally adjusted for BMI category, diabetes, hypertension, chronic cardiac and respiratory diseases. In the SRR cohort, Model 1 adjusted for age and sex; Model 2 additionally adjusted for modality, PRD group and KRT duration; Model 3 additionally adjusted for SIMD, vaccination status and calendar time.