Skip to main content
. 1998 Apr;64(4):1430–1435. doi: 10.1128/aem.64.4.1430-1435.1998

TABLE 5.

Results of WF and HF soils tested for infectious ToMV by elution and bait plant methods

Soil type and collection datea Eluate bioassayb Mean A405 ± SD (n)c of:
No. of TEM+/no. of DAS-ELISA+ extractsd
Noninfected extracts Infected extracts
WF mineral
 6/94 0.20 ± 0.02 (6)
 8/94 0.20 ± 0.02 (6)
 2/95 0.19 ± 0.01 (6)
 4/95 0.21 ± 0.02 (6)
 9/95 0.20 ± 0.02 (5)
 12/95 0.22 ± 0.02 (4) 0.31 ± 0.06 (1) 0/1
WF organic
 6/94 0.24 ± 0.02 (6) 0.32 ± 0.03 (2) 1/2
 8/94 0.38 ± 0.07 (6) 4/6
 4/95 0.21 ± 0.03 (6)
 9/95 0.20 ± 0.01 (5)
 12/95 0.21 ± 0.02 (2)
HF
 2/95 + 0.22 ± 0.02 (4) 0.37 ± 0 (2) 1/2
 9/95 0.20 ± 0.03 (5) 0.39 ± 0.01 (1) 0/1
a

Month/year. 

b

C. quinoa plants were inoculated with concentrated soil eluates and monitored for the development of local lesions. 

c

A bait plant root extract was considered positive for ToMV if the mean A405, as determined by DAS-ELISA, of the two sample wells was greater than the mean absorbance (plus three standard deviations) of roots of C. quinoa grown in Promix (A405 = 0.22 ± 0.01 [mean ± standard deviation]). For comparison, the A405 values of dilutions of purified ToMV were 1.7, 0.33, 0.30, and 0.21 for 100, 10, 5, and 1 ng/ml, respectively. —, no extracts. 

d

Root extracts that tested positive for ToMV by DAS-ELISA also were examined for tobamovirus-like particles by TEM.