Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 1;2015(6):CD009566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009566.pub2

Canonica 2003.

Methods Parallel‐group RCT
Participants 139 participants recruited with moderate to severe perennial allergic conjunctivitis
Interventions Three treatment arms: azelastine 0.05% eye drops; placebo eye drops; levocabastine eye drops. Duration of treatment 6 weeks
Outcomes Investigator assessment (itching and redness). Change in clinical sum score (itching and redness using a scale range 0‐6)
Participant assessment of ocular symptoms (daily diaries using a 4‐point scale; 0 = none, 3 = severe symptoms)
Time points: at baseline and day 7, 21, and 42 of treatment
Country France, Italy, Spain, Russia, and United Kingdom
Number randomised, gender (male:female) 139 participants randomised. M:F 65:74
Age mean (SD), median, range Mean (SD): azelastine group 34 years (13.7); placebo group 36 years (13.0); levocabastine 34 years (13.2)
Notes Study conducted from 2 December 1998 to 16 June 1999. Source of funding: University of Genoa, Italy and Clinical and Biometrical Development, VIATRIS GmbH & Co. KG. Declaration of interest by the authors was not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation code (p.323 ‐ drugs): "A predefined randomisation code was used to assign azelastine, placebo or levocabastine treatment to qualified patients in an unbalanced fashion (ratio 2:2:1)."
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk The method used to conceal the allocation sequence was not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Data were nearly fully reported, with less than 10% lost to follow‐up, and the reasons were given
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Evidence was available of proper outcome reporting
Other bias Low risk No apparent evidence of other risk of bias
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐masked (p.323 ‐ drugs): "Both azelastine eye drops and the matching vehicle containing placebo were provided by VIATRIS GmbH in identical packaging."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Double‐masked (p.323 ‐ drugs): "Both azelastine eye drops and the matching vehicle containing placebo were provided by VIATRIS GmbH in identical packaging."