Varguez‐Rodriguez 2009.
Methods | Parallel‐group RCT | |
Participants | 40 participants (naive‐treatment) with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis | |
Interventions | Two treatment arms: olopatadine 0.1%; ketotifen 0.025%. Duration of treatment 4 weeks | |
Outcomes | Assessment of ocular symptoms: itching, watering, burning (range 0‐3; 0 = none, 3 = severe) and signs: redness, chemosis (absent, present) Unclear if outcomes were measured by participants or clinicians, or both |
|
Country | Mexico | |
Number randomised, gender (male:female) | 40 participants randomised. M:F 23:17 | |
Age mean (SD), median, range | Mean (SD): olopatadine 19.7 years (6.6); ketotifen 21.05 years (8.3) | |
Notes | Source of funding not stated. Declaration of interest by the authors was not stated | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | The method used to generate the allocation sequence was not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | The method used to conceal the allocation sequence was not described |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Complete outcome data reported, all the participants randomised were analysed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Evidence was available of proper outcome reporting |
Other bias | Low risk | No apparent evidence of other risk of bias |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Masking of participants (p.401 ‐ methods): "All the bottles had the same appearance and the patient did not know the treatment received." |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Masking of investigators (p.401 ‐ methods): "All the bottles had the same appearance and the patient did not know the treatment received." |