Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 1;2015(6):CD009566. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009566.pub2

Varguez‐Rodriguez 2009.

Methods Parallel‐group RCT
Participants 40 participants (naive‐treatment) with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis
Interventions Two treatment arms: olopatadine 0.1%; ketotifen 0.025%. Duration of treatment 4 weeks
Outcomes Assessment of ocular symptoms: itching, watering, burning (range 0‐3; 0 = none, 3 = severe) and signs: redness, chemosis (absent, present)
Unclear if outcomes were measured by participants or clinicians, or both
Country Mexico
Number randomised, gender (male:female) 40 participants randomised. M:F 23:17
Age mean (SD), median, range Mean (SD): olopatadine 19.7 years (6.6); ketotifen 21.05 years (8.3)
Notes Source of funding not stated. Declaration of interest by the authors was not stated
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk The method used to generate the allocation sequence was not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk The method used to conceal the allocation sequence was not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Complete outcome data reported, all the participants randomised were analysed
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Evidence was available of proper outcome reporting
Other bias Low risk No apparent evidence of other risk of bias
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Masking of participants (p.401 ‐ methods): "All the bottles had the same appearance and the patient did not know the treatment received."
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Masking of investigators (p.401 ‐ methods): "All the bottles had the same appearance and the patient did not know the treatment received."