Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 30;23:171. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-01139-7

Table 2.

Comparison of reconstruction time, image noise, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and visual evaluation of coronary arteries between super-resolution deep learning reconstruction and model-based iterative reconstruction

Parameter SR-DLR MBIR p-value
Reconstruction time, s 97 (88–109) 173 (164–187) < 0.01
Image noise, HU
 Ascending aorta 22.5 (20.5–31.8) 29.1 (26.2–36.6) < 0.01
 Left atrium 22.4 ± 4.0 30.1 ± 5.4 < 0.01
 Septal wall of the ventricle 20.5 ± 3.6 23.7 ± 3.8 < 0.01
 All locations 22.1 (19.3–24.9) 27.4 (24.2–31.2) < 0.01
SNR 16.3 (11.8–21.8) 13.7 (9.9–18.4) 0.01
CNR 24.4 (15.5–30.2) 19.2 (14.1–23.2) < 0.01
Overall quality (scale 1–4) 4.0 (4.0–4.0) 3.0 (3.0–4.0) < 0.01

SR-DLR, super-resolution deep learning reconstruction; MBIR, model-based iterative reconstruction; SNR, signal-to-noise ratio; CNR, contrast-to-noise ratio