Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 27;29:e941111-1–e941111-12. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941111

Supplementary Table 2.

Sensitivity analysis of associations between sitting time and kidney function decline-1 (n=110 721).

Quartile 1 (n=27 531) Quartile 2 (n=22 705) Quartile 3 (n=31 704) Quartile 4 (n=28 781) P for trend
Cases 598 (2.2%) 520 (2.3%) 765 (2.4%) 744 (2.6%) 0.010
Model 1 1 1.028 (0.914–1.156) 1.059 (0.952–1.179) 1.070 (0.961–1.192) 0.183
Model 2 1 1.039 (0.921–1.172) 1.089 (0.976–1.215) 1.198 (1.074–1.338) <0.001
Model 3 1 1.025 (0.906–1.161) 1.070 (0.955–1.198) 1.173 (1.048–1.314) 0.004

The outcome was defined as an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at follow-up or more than a 30% decrease in eGFR from baseline, CKD-related hospitalization or death, or the presence of end-stage renal disease. In this analysis, participants with cancer, cardiovascular diseases, stroke, chronic respiratory diseases, and liver cirrhosis at baseline were excluded. Quartiles of sitting time: 1st quartile ≤17.4 h/week, 2nd quartile=17.5–27.9 h/week, 3rd quartile=28.0–36.9 h/week, 4th quartile ≥37 h/week. Model 1: Crude HR. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, current smoking, and current drinking. Model 3: Adjusted for covariates in model 2 plus BMI, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and MVPA. HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.