Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 27;29:e941111-1–e941111-12. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941111

Supplementary Table 3.

Sensitivity analysis of associations between sitting time and kidney function decline-2 (n=132 123).

Quartile 1 (n=32 947) Quartile 2 (n=27 162) Quartile 3 (n=37 810) Quartile 4 (n=34 204) P for trend
Cases 894 (2.7%) 767 (2.8%) 1153 (3.1%) 1076 (3.2%) 0.003
Model 1 1 1.013 (0.920–1.116) 1.079 (0.989–1.177) 1.052 (0.963–1.150) 0.137
Model 2 1 1.018 (0.924–1.121) 1.097 (1.005–1.197) 1.154 (1.056–1.261) <0.001
Model 3 1 1.004 (0.911–1.106) 1.077 (0.987–1.175) 1.135 (1.038–1.240) 0.002

The outcome was defined as an eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and a rate of decline more than 1 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year, CKD-related hospitalization or death, or the presence of end-stage renal disease. Analysis was done after imputing for missing information. Quartiles of sitting time: 1st quartile ≤17.4 h/week, 2nd quartile=17.5–27.9 h/week, 3rd quartile=28.0–36.9 h/week, 4th quartile ≥37 h/week. Model 1: Crude HR. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, current smoking, and current drinking. Model 3: Adjusted for covariates in Model 2 plus BMI, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and MVPA. HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.