Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 27;29:e941111-1–e941111-12. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941111

Supplementary Table 5.

Sensitivity analysis of associations between sitting time and kidney function decline-4 (n=132 123).

Quartile 1 (n=32 947) Quartile 2 (n=27 162) Quartile 3 (n=37 810) Quartile 4 (n=34 204) P for trend
Cases 624 (1.9%) 507 (1.9%) 739 (2.0%) 736 (2.2%) 0.013
Model 1 1 0.960 (0.854–1.079) 0.990 (0.890–1.102) 1.033 (0.928–1.149) 0.465
Model 2 1 0.957 (0.849–1.079) 1.001 (0.898–1.115) 1.099 (0.986–1.226) 0.062
Model 3 1 0.948 (0.838–1.072) 0.994 (0.889–1.111) 1.078 (0.964–1.205) 0.126

The outcome was defined as more than a 30% decrease in eGFR from baseline, CKD-related hospitalization or death, or the presence of end-stage renal disease. Quartiles of sitting time: 1st quartile ≤17.4 h/week, 2nd quartile=17.5–27.9 h/week, 3rd quartile=28.0–36.9 h/week, 4th quartile ≥37 h/week. Model 1: Crude HR. Model 2: Adjusted for age, sex, current smoking, and current drinking. Model 3: Adjusted for covariates in Model 2 plus BMI, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia and MVPA. HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.