Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2023 Sep 13;89(10):e01217-23. doi: 10.1128/aem.01217-23

Possible beneficial interactions of ciliated protozoans with coral health and resilience

Chinnarajan Ravindran 1,2,, Lawrance Irudayarajan 1,2, Haritha P Raveendran 1
Editor: Jennifer B Glass3
PMCID: PMC10617535  PMID: 37702497

ABSTRACT

Microbial interactions contribute significantly to coral health in the marine environment. Most beneficial associations have been described with their bacterial communities, but knowledge of beneficial associations between protozoan ciliates and corals is still lacking. Ciliates are important bacterial predators and provide nutrition to higher trophic-level organisms. The mucus secreted by corals and the microenvironment of the coral surface layer attract ciliates based on their food preferences. The mixotrophic and heterotrophic ciliates play a major role in nutrient cycling by increasing nitrogen, phosphorus, and extractable sulfur, which can enhance the proliferation of coral beneficial microbe. Besides, bacterial predator ciliates reduce the pathogenic bacterial population that infects the coral and also act as bioindicators for assessing the toxicity of the reef ecosystem. Thus, these ciliates can be used as a beneficial partner in influencing coral health and resilience under various stress conditions. Herein, we explore the urgent need to understand the complex beneficial interactions of ciliates that may occur in the coral reef ecosystem.

KEYWORDS: ciliates, corals, beneficial, symbiosis, health

INTRODUCTION

Corals are invertebrate animals of the Anthozoa class of the phylum Cnidaria with gastrointestinal cavities and tentacles. Coral reefs are formed by compact groups of genetically identical individual polyps held together by calcium carbonate. Coral reefs are microbe-driven ecosystems as they rely on host-related microorganisms for food, nutrients, and trace elements to survive in oligotrophic seas (1). As a result, while corals get their organic nutrients from the photosynthetic dinoflagellate Symbiodiniaceae, they also get their nutrition and defense-enhancing qualities from other helpful microorganisms such as viruses, bacteria, fungus, archaea, and protists that are present in their environment (28). Thus, an assemblage of a host and the many other species living in or around it together form a discrete ecological unit called a holobiont (9). Nutrients derived from the associated organisms are used by corals for reef formation using calcium carbonate and carbon-rich mucus secretion (10). Of all the microorganisms associated with corals, ciliate species distribution and interactions with host coral are not clearly described, although they occur in almost all environments (11, 12). For example, many ciliated species have been described for their close association with marine ecosystems as symbiotic interactions with invertebrates, fishes, and even prokaryotes (13). Also, the benthic ciliates of coral reefs are known to acquire photosymbiosis phototrophy hosting Symbiodinium endosymbionts (14, 15). Thus, the protozoan ciliates have attracted increased attention over the last few decades to understand their role and function in the coral ecosystem. Nevertheless, these protozoa are widely discussed as secondary invaders of immunosuppressed coral fragments, foraging voraciously on the microbial community including the Symbiodinium with coral tissues (16). However, other diverse ecological interactions of the ciliates benefitting the coral host are the least targeted.

Ciliates are a group of alveolates, single-celled eukaryotic organisms whose cells measure about 10 µm to a few millimeters (13). These ciliates have short-hair-like structures called cilia that beat in an integrated way to form water currents for locomotion and feeding bacteria. Ciliates also act as essential regenerators and contribute significantly to maintaining new and high production in the water column (17). Free-living ciliates obtain nutrients by eating microbes, such as bacteria, algae, fungi, or other protozoa. Therefore, the primary role of ciliates feeding on bacteria, or organic matter such as dead tissue or living cells (histophagy or “tissue eating”) by phagotrophy on diseased corals described them as secondary invaders (18). Some ciliates also utilize dissolved organic compounds (osmotrophy). Thus, both phagotrophy and osmotrophy are found in both symbiotic and free-living ciliates (19). However, the phagotrophic and osmotrophic processes for a particular species that are associated with coral health have not been studied. Ciliates of different life stages associated with corals may interact or develop opportunistic, mutualistic, commensal, or parasitic relationships with respect to ambient environmental conditions (Fig. 1). A ciliate may also be an ectocommensal that feeds on detritus from diseased or dead corals. Some ciliate-coral interactions can be food specific and influenced by the size, shape, and biochemical composition of prey cells (16). For instance, ciliates have been described for their direct or indirect transmission in diseased corals and for devouring the damaged tissues (2027). We can therefore define four potential types of ciliate interactions with corals. First, ectocommensal or free-living ciliate feed on dead, dying remains and detritus from living corals. The second relationship of mutualism with corals is the exchange of nutrients. A third group would be free-living or symbiotic ciliates that either inhibit or inactivate the microbial pathogens of corals. A fourth group would be free-living ciliates that can serve as food for the early life stages of corals. However, the distinct role of ciliates in all the above possible interactions is not well understood. Although the ciliates have been related to coral-associated diseases, their pathophysiology in immunocompromised tissues is not well understood (28). Besides, Koch’s postulates have not yet been satisfied for any of the described ciliates that are associated with coral diseases (29). This complication is because mixed ciliate communities have been notified of blooming over the infected coral tissues (29) along with the other microbes and macroalgae. Consequently, there is no clear experimental demonstration of their possible role as primary or secondary causal agents, although some ciliates are described for the direct consumption of symbiotic algae (25, 3032). Besides, the ciliates biodiversity and ecological roles in the coral reef ecosystem are unclear. Thus, the ciliate diversity and other biological and nutrient parameters in the coral ecosystem are reviewed comprehensively to understand their possible beneficial influence on coral health.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Ciliates and their different life stages identified and isolated from coral species. (a) Cohnilembus verminus adult, (b) C. verminus larvae, (c) C. verminus division, (d) Holosticha diademata adult, (e) H. diademata larvae, (f) H. diademata division, (g) Euplotes sp. adult, (h) Euplotes sp. larvae, (l) Euplotes sp. division, (j) Uronema marinum adult, (k) U. marinum larvae, and (l) U. marinum division were observed and isolated from Acropora sp. and Porites sp. C. verminus was observed for its occurrence only in Porites sp. (from coral reefs of Gulf of Mannar reserve regions, Tamil Nadu, India).

Diversity of ciliates—on different types of ciliates (heterotrophic, autotrophic, free-living, and host associated) associated with different coral species

Ciliates are classified into three types: free-swimming ciliates, crawling ciliates, and stalked ciliates. Free-swimming ciliates possess cilia on all surfaces of the body (e.g., Litonotus and Paramecium). Crawling ciliates have cilia only on the ventral or belly surface near the mouth (e.g., Aspidisca and Euplotes). Stalked ciliates have cilia around the mouth and have a head and stalk (e.g., Carchesium and Voticella). All of these ciliate forms were characterized using various ecological strategies ranging from heterotrophy to mixotrophy and from free living to symbionts (13) (Table 1). The diversity of benthic ciliates in Arctic sea sediments and China’s coastal areas were found to be influenced by habitat type, salinity, and granulometric composition of sediments, which promoted changes in the ciliate community (33, 34). Thus, seawater temperature, dissolved oxygen, water depth, pH, salinity, and grain size are described as the important factors that drive ciliate diversity (33, 34). Symbiotic ciliates depend on an external source for organic compounds in mutual, commensal, or parasitic relationships with different types of species of corals (Table 1). All major types of symbiotic ciliates are known to control microbial community composition and biomass (35, 36) leading to a strong control over pelagic and benthic food webs (3741). Thus, ciliates act as major predators by consuming more food than mesozooplankton during all seasons (17).

TABLE 1.

Types of ciliates and their associated corals

Ciliate types Ciliate subtypes Examples Associated with corals
Heterotrophs Bacterivores Scuticociliates—Cohnilembus verminus, Homalogastra setosa, Helicostoma nonatum (=Porpostoma notatum), Uronema sp., Paranophrys magna Acropora sp., Porites sp., Montastraea sp. (11, 32),
Herbivores Oligotrichs—Varistrombidium sp., Varistrombidium kielum, choreotrichs, peritrichs, and prostomatids Acropora sp., Porites sp. (11, 32)
Carnivores Haptotrichs, Hymenostomes, class—Litostomatea (subclass Haptoria—Litonotus pictus, Trachelotractus sp., Chaenea vorax) Pocillopora sp., Acropora sp., Dipolaria sp., Goniopora sp., Orbicella sp., Porites sp. (11, 32)
Histophages Scuticociliates—Helicostoma nonatum (=Porpostoma notatum), Uronema sp., Paranophrys magna, Cohnilembus verminus, Homalogastra setosa Porites astreoides, Montastraea faveolata; Acropora (11, 25, 31, 32)
Symbionts Commensals Phyllopharyngia—Trochilia petrani, Trochilioides recta, Hartmannula derouxi, Dysteria derouxi; Suctoria (Paracineta limbata, Acineta sp,. Suctoria sp.); many scuticociliates (Uronema heteromarinum; Philaster guamense, P. lucinda, Glauconema trihymene) Acropora sp., Porites sp., Pocillopora sp., Orbicella sp., Colpophyllia sp., Dipolaria sp., Goniopora sp., Montastraea annularis (11, 32, 42)
Parasites Scuticociliates—Uronema heteromarinum; Philaster guamense, P. lucinda, Glauconema trihymene Pocillopora sp., Acropora sp., Porites sp., Orbicella sp. (11, 32)
Facultative mixotrophs Heterotrichea—Protocruzia adherens, Licnophora macfarlandi, Halofolliculina coralliasia, Condylostoma sp.; Hypotrichia (Diophrys sp., Euplotes sp., Aspidisca sp.) Oligotrichia (Varistrombidium kielum); Strichotrichia (Holosticha diademata, Pseudokeronopsis sp., Anteholosticha sp., Hemigastrostyla enigmatica); Litostomatea (subclass Haptoria—Litonotus pictus), Prostomatea (Cryptocaryon sp.) Pocillopora sp., Acropora sp., Porites sp., Orbicella sp., A. muricata, Diophrys sp.—
Montastraea annularis, Colpophyllia sp. (11, 32)

Functional roles of ciliates—on ciliates and nutrient cycling

The role of a protozoan in nutrient cycling is frequently influenced by its natural habitat and adaptations to its environment. Their nutrient dynamics are greatly affected by the nutrient transformation, whether it is energy demanding or energy yielding, and most transformation involves a prey-predator relationship, which increases mineralization and leads to nutrient cycling (43). Thus, bacterial grazing improves nutrient mineralization of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus and excretes surplus nutrients (44). Furthermore, amoebal grazing has been discovered to aid in the biochemical and biological mineralization of bacterial sulfur to extractable sulfur (44). Bacterial grazing by ciliates also occasionally releases partially decomposed cells and other bacterium components, whose mineralization raises nitrogen and phosphorus levels in the ecosystem (45, 46) (Fig. 2). Protozoans, as another carbon flux, assimilate carbon dioxide in glucose fermentation to succinic acid and serve as a carbon sink and source (47, 48). It has also been described that phytoplankton grazing ciliates emit algal dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP), also known as prey particulate DMSP, into the seawater (49) (Fig. 2). Thus, released DMSP, an organic carbon, and the sulfur source may increase the prevalence of coral beneficial microbes (phytoplankton, heterotrophic bacteria, and bacterivore and herbivore microzooplankton) (50) (Fig. 2). For example, coral-associated bacterium, Pseudovibrio sp., can use DMSP as a sole sulfur or carbon source and potentially as a precursor in the biosynthesis of tropodithietic acid (TDA), which inhibits the growth of coral disease-causing pathogens, Vibrio coralliilyticus and V. owensii (4). The nutrients produced by these interactions, such as C, N, and P, may help to revive Symbiodiniaceae growth and increase the resilience of the afflicted corals (Fig. 2). Similarly, coral-associated stramenopile protists of Fungia granulosa have been reported as delivering food and nutrients to coral hosts while they recover from stress such as bleaching events and tissue loss (51). Henceforth, the nutrient cycling of ciliates in the coral reef ecosystem may aid in coral recovery with possible beneficial microbiomes including the invasion of endosymbiont Symbiodinium in the coral tissues.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Ciliates nutrient cycles in the coral reef food web and their possible role in coral resilience. (A) Ciliates heterotrophic nutrition on the microbes (intruded by wastewater) excretes C, N, and P. (B) At high temperatures, the pathogenic microbes of waste intrusions or coral reef associates gain virulence and cause coral disease leading to coral Symbiodiniaceae expulsion. (C) The expelled or elsewhere symbionts consumed by mixotrophic ciliates excrete C, N, P, and DMSP. (D) This DMSP is further utilized as a precursor by the coral beneficial microbes (CBM) in the production of TDA (antimicrobial compound) and thereby exhibits biological control over pathogens. CBM also fixes the carbon, phosphorus, and nitrogen of the excreta to bring about the organic compound distribution. (E) Beneficial ciliates’ interaction with corals might bring coral resilience due to nitrogen fixation, sulfur transformation, bacterivorous activity against coral pathogens, phosphate storage, and high photosynthesis. These activities of mutual interactions between ciliate and corals may aid coral health by structuring bacterial communities and attracting the Symbiodiniaceae.

Role of ciliates in coral disease—on causation/secondary infection or amelioration of disease

Halofolliculina corallasia was known to cause the first ciliate disease Skeleton-eroding band (SEB) in Caribbean and Indo-Pacific corals (11, 32, 52). H. corallasia influenced tissue loss in black band disease (BBD)-affected corals was also described (16). However, no other species of the genus Halofolliculina, and none of the other 31 genera in the family Folliculinidae, are known to cause diseases in corals or any other animals (52). Philaster guamense (formerly termed Porpostoma guamense) was found dominantly associated with the lesions of brown band (BrB) disease (21, 26, 30). The ubiquitous disease, White syndrome (WS), is also described for varied ciliate community associations with the disease lesions (11, 26, 32). Thus, varied diseases such as brown jelly syndrome (BJS), white plague (WP), and white band disease (WBD) with different ciliate community associations were discussed in detail (32) (Table 2). About 28 ciliate species were described for their association with varied coral diseases and among which 12 ciliate species have been described for engulfing the symbiotic algae (Table 1) (32). Although the previous investigations related different ciliate species associations with various coral diseases, only a few were associated with disease progression (11, 32). Thus, no extensive research on the specific involvement of ciliates in coral pathobiology and their pathogenesis on immunocompromised tissues has been described (26, 32). For example, although the association of ciliates with Porites white patch syndrome (PWPS) was reported, the bacterial pathogen Vibrio tubiashii has been confirmed as a causative agent of PWPS (20). Therefore, the difficulty in confirming the roles of mixed ciliate communities in coral disease remains unclear (21, 26, 29). Besides, no distinct ciliates infection experimental demonstration for their possible role as primary or secondary causal agents based on Koch’s postulates was made, although the fact that some ciliates are known to consume symbiotic algae directly (22, 26, 2932).

TABLE 2.

Protozoan ciliates and their possible mode of association in the coral ecosystem

Ciliates Type Regions Reported occurrence in dead and diseased tissues of corals and the associated diseases Possible functions
Protocruzia adherens, Trochilioides recta, Trochilia petrani, Litonotus pictus, Hartmannula derouxi, Licnophora macfarlandi, Chaenea vorax, Dysteria derouxi, Hemigastrostyla enigmatica, Uronema heteromarinum, Acineta sp., Halofolliculina sp., Halofolliculina corallasia, Porpostoma guamense. Hartmannula derouxi, Diophrys sp., Aspidisca sp., Philaster sp., Varistrombis sp., Helicostoma nonatum, Diophrys sp., Varistrombidium kielum, Philaster lucinda, Philaster guamense, Glauconema trihymene, Euplotes sp., Pseudokeronopsis sp., Holosticha diademata Free living Great Barrier Reef Solomon and the Heron Islands, Fiji, Maldives, UK Aquaria Acropora muricata, A. aspera, Pocillopora damicornis, Acropora spp., Acropora muricata, Pocillopora damicornis and Porites cylindrica, Acropora muricata, A. aspera, Acropora sp., A. acuminata, A. surculosa, Porites astreoides, Montastraea faveolata, Acropora muricata (11, 16, 22, 26, 5357). SEB disease, BBD, WS, BJS, BrB Majority of the identified and reported ciliates here are described earlier as bacterivores (11). Thus, might feed upon bacterial pathogens, dead coral tissues, or excess mucosal nutrients (11) that may reduce the disease progression/severity caused by bacterial pathogens.
Halofoliculina sp., Holosticha diademata, Protocruzia adherens, Uronema heteromarinum, Anteholosticha sp., Cryptocaryon sp., Dysteria derouxi, Chaenea vorax, Trochilioides recta, Philaster lucinda, Acineta sp., Varistrombidium kielum, and Suctoria sp. Alveolate sp. Varistrombidium kielum, Trochilia petrani, Glauconema trihymene, Pseudocarnopsis sp., Licnophora macfarlandi, Paracineta limbata, Trachelotractus sp. Free living Caribbean sea, Venezuela, and Columbia Acropora cervicornis, Orbicella annularis, O. faveolata, Colpophyllia natans, Montastraea annularis, Acropora palmata, A. prolifera(11, 16, 58, 59).
WBD and SEB
It is possible that these ciliates may help their coral hosts in acquiring essential nutrients or act as an additional food source during stress such as tissue loss and bleaching events (51).
These coral surface microorganisms may provide protection against coral pathogens by secretion of antibiotic substances (60).
Ciliate species are known to recycle organic substances that may aid in the production of the number of essential nutrients required for corals (51).
These ciliates and their symbiotic association with matter cycling are involved in nitrogen fixation, sulfur transformation, high photosynthesis, phosphate storage (61), and UV protection of the ciliate host with mycosproine-like amino acids (62) which may aid corals to revive from their diseased or stressed conditions.
Philaster sp. Paraphilaster sp. and a ciliate belong to the order—Prostomatida, Helicostoma nonatum Free living Florida Keys Orbicella faveolata, Siderastrea sidereal (16, 28). WP, BrB-like, and BJS-like signs
Philaster lucinda, Uronema heteromarinum, Dysteria derouxi, Varistrombidium kielum, Paracineta limbata, Holosticha diademata, Chaenea vorax, Philaster lucinda, Trochilioides recta, Licnophora macfarlandi, Halofolliculina corallasia, Paracineta limbata, and Condylostoma sp. Free-living Moyonette, Reunion and South Africa reefs Acropora muricata, Porites lutea (11, 16)
Porpostoma sp., Philaster sp. Free living Barrier reefs of Bermuda and Belize Montastrea annularis and Diploria strigma (16, 63); BBD
Philaster lucinda, Suctoria sp., Protocruzia adherens, Chaenea vorax, and Holosticha diademata Free living South Africa, Venezuela Reunion, Maldives, and Moyonette Porites lutea, Acropora muricata, Goniopora djiboutiensis, Colpophyllia natans, Orbicella annularis, and Diplora sp. (11, 16)
Halofolliculina corallasia Free living Gulf of Aqaba, the Red Sea Stylophora sp., Acropora muricata, Seriatopora sp., Hydnophora sp., Galaxea sp., Pocillopora sp., Mycedium sp., Montipora sp., Echinopora sp., Lobophyllia sp., Goniastrea sp., Millepora sp., Platygyra sp., Fungia sp., Favia sp., Porites sp., Goniopora sp., Favites sp., and Pavona sp. (16, 22, 64, 65); SEB
Condylostoma sp., Porpostoma sp., Philaster sp., Porpostoma guamense, Philaster lucinda, Varistrombidium sp., Trachelotractus sp., Holosticha diademata, Homalogastra setosa, Euplotes sp., Cohnilembus verminus, Halofolliculina sp. Free living with ingested Symbiodinium sp. Moyonette, Reunion and South Africa reefs, Caribbean sea, Venezuela and Columbia, Great Barrier Reef Solomon and the Heron Islands Acropora muricata, A. surculosa, A. hyacinthus, A. cervicornis, A. palmate, A. prolifera, Diploria sp., Colpophyllia natans, Montastraea annularis, M. faveolata, M. franksi, Madracis mirabilis, M. decactis, Diploria labyrinthiformis, Porites furcata, P. astreoides, Agaricia agaricites, A. tenuifolia, A. fragilis, A. lamarcki, Siderastrea siderea, Scolimia cubensis, Leptoseris cuculata, Stephanochoenia intersepta, and Millepora alcicornis (11, 16, 21, 30, 54, 59, 66); BrB, BBD, and SEB Mixotrophic ciliates containing endosymbiotic algae, or by sequestering chloroplasts may infect and establish an endosymbiotic relationship with corals, similar to Symbiodinium sp. until they recover from stress such as bleaching.
Chromera velia Symbiotic Australia Montipora digitata, Acropora digitifera (larvae), and A. tenuis (larvae) (99).

Ciliate’s ingestion of symbiotic algae

Ciliates are known for predation of different prey categories (bacteria, pico-, and nanoplanktons, diatoms, and dinoflagellates) through mixotrophy and heterotrophy (67). Their mixotrophic forms (e.g., Mesodinium rubrum) exhibit both phototrophy and heterotrophy. Protozoan ciliates such as Paraeuplotes tortugensis, Euplotes uncinatus, and Maristentor dinoferus are described to be associated with Symbiodiniaceae members. Also, dinoflagellates (around 50–800 dinoflagellates) of genus Symbiodinium clade C are noticed internally inside a single Maristentor dinoferus performing symbiotic exchange of nutrients from ciliate to dinoflagellate and photosynthates from dinoflagellate to its ciliate host (14, 15, 68). In this act, the host ciliates are benefitted from algal photosynthate and the photosynthetic oxygen generations, which are utilized to increase their oxic respiration diffusion limits under closely populated diseased lesion conditions (30, 53). Besides, the ingested Symbiodiniaceae remains undamaged within the cytostome and maintained actively within the ciliates host for 2–3 days, until digested (21, 30, 58, 69, 70) (Fig. 2 and 3; Table 3). Also, the chloroplasts of the ingested dinoflagellates are demonstrated to remain functional by fixing carbon which is metabolized by the ciliate (70, 71). Furthermore, beyond 50 Symbiodiniaceae members are ingested by a BrB disease-associated ciliate of class Scuticociliata, foraging voraciously upon the diseased polyps Acropora hyacinthus and A. muricata remains photosynthetically competent (30, 31, 53, 72). Thus, BrB and WS disease are associated with nine ciliate ribotypes, among which four ciliates ingested the endosymbiotic algae, indicative of ciliate histophagy over the coral tissues (26). Similarly, different ciliates (Propostoma guamense, Philaster lucinda, Varistrombidium sp., Trachelotractus sp., Condylostoma sp., Holosticha sp., and Cohnilembus verminus) associated with Acropora spp. and Porites sp. are described for engulfing the endosymbiont through histophagy from the immunocompromised corals (16, 21, 54, 58) (Table 3; Fig. 3; Videos S1 and S2). Symbiodiniaceae of the decaying octocorals are also devoured by ciliate histophagy (Porpostoma and Philaster) (66). Thus, about 16 ciliate species have been reported for ingestion of coral-associated endosymbiotic algae (32) (Table 3). The ciliate heterotrophy or mixotrophy nature of feeding in coral reefs described above was the only known example of marine ciliates that host real endosymbionts. However, the ciliate ingestion of coral-associated endosymbionts is not well understood for a specific function in the coral-ciliate interactions or their prevalence in coral reef ecosystems (32, 58, 63, 67). Also, it is unclear whether ingestion of Symbiodiniaceae by the ciliate occurred during feeding live or dead tissues of coral (carnivorous/histophagous) or attains from elsewhere (algivorous) (53).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Cohnilembus verminus feeding on coral detritus and zoozanthellae. (a) C. verminus adults from Porites sp. (b) and (c) C. verminus feeding the zooxanthellae with white arrows denoting their bulged portions due to engulfed feed (d) C. verminus feeding on coral dead tissues and bacteria denoted with red arrows. (e) C. verminus with engulfed zooxanthellae, white arrows denoting the presence of zooxanthellae inside and outside the cell of the ciliate.

TABLE 3.

Marine ciliates containing chloroplasts, cleptochloroplasts, and dinoflagellates

Marine ciliates Reference
Marine ciliates containing chloroplast/cleptochloroplasts
Myrionecta rubra (photoautotrophs) (73)
Tontonia sp.
Laboea strobila (obligate mixotrophs)
Strombidium conicum (obligate mixotrophs) (74)
S. rassoulzadegani (obligate mixotrophs)
Marine benthic ciliates (photoautotrophs) (75, 76)
Mesodinium coatsi—green plastid
M. pulex
M. chamaeleon—green plastid
M. rubrum
M. major
Marine ciliates containing dinoflagellates (77)
 Many species of oligotrichs in the genera Tontonia, Laboea, and Strombidium sequester or enslave chloroplasts from ingested flagellates
Coral-associated ciliates containing dinoflagellates (32)
 Many reports described on ciliates containing the coral-associated dinoflagellate species such as Condylostoma sp., Porpostoma sp., Philaster sp., Varistrombidium kielum, Trachelotractus sp., Holosticha diademata, Homalogastra setosa, Euplotes sp., Cohnilembus verminus, Halofolliculina sp., Maristentor dinoferus, and Paraeuplotes tortugensis

Ciliates as bioindicators

The short generation time and delicate membrane of ciliates are most reactive to environmental changes. Thus, ciliated protozoans are used as a biological indicator in assessing the pollution and toxicity of an aquatic ecosystem (61). Ciliates perform an important role in balancing the biological ecosystem by grazing the majority of dispersed bacteria to reduce the biological oxygen demand (BOD) and suspended matter content of the wastewater (7880). Any change in these protozoan communities affects the entire food web and thereby the biological performance of the waste treatment. Thus, the protozoan community structure is an important indicator of the working conditions of artificial waste treatment plants (61). It was also observed that increasing eutrophication brought a ciliate assemblage shift from oligotrich algivorous to omnivorous-non-selective gymnostomatids to detritivorous-bacterivorous scuticociliatids (81). Thus, the nutrient content of the seawater plays a major role in the occurrence of varied ciliate communities. Besides, it has been demonstrated that the algivorous ciliate Tintinnopsis baltica and Favella ehrenbergii as indicators of low levels of nutrients and bacterivorous/detritivorous, while Uronema marinum as an indicator of eutrophication/organic-rich and oxygen-poor environments (81). Ciliates are also observed frequently in industrial waste containing toxic matters such as heavy metals, detergents, antibiotics, etc., serving as an indicator of the toxicant presence in the affected ecosystem (82). In this process, around 230 protozoan species (160 ciliates) such as Uronema nigricans, Pseudocohnilembus pusillus, Euplotes aediculatus, E. affinis, E. patella, etc. are identified (62, 83). Furthermore, they have a wide ecological significance and perform major functions in elementary cycling and energy flow in aquatic food webs (84). Henceforth, ciliates can be assumed to be bioindicators of wastewater intrusions into the coral ecosystem. In this context, the corals affected by anthropogenic wastewater inflow can be controlled by their associated ciliates through predation or grazing, reducing the BOD, and suspended matter. This might reduce the pathogenic bacterial intrusion into the coral ecosystem and reduce the chances of a bacterial infection or disease severity in the corals.

Bacterivorous ciliates against coral pathogens

The protozoan has been recognized as a potential biological control for pathogen removal within ecological systems such as aquaculture (85). They are also used as bacterivorous organisms to prey on pathogens to avoid bacterial infection in an environmentally friendly manner (85). Thus, as bacterial predators, protozoans play a vital role in maintaining the ecology of the aquatic environment (86). The marine ciliate Strombidium sp. was studied for its ability to feed on pathogenic species such as Vibrio campbellii, V. harveyi, and Escherichia coli (85). Apart from bacteriophages, ciliates are important bacterial predators of the microbial ecosystem (87, 88). Other bacterivorous ciliates such as Paramecium caudatum, Halteria grandinella, Tetrahymena vorax, and Tetrahymena pyriformis are reported to prey on microbes unrestricted to any bacteria type by non-selective phagocytosis (89). Also, the feeding response of estuarine ciliate Uronema nigricans is larger when fed Vibrio sp. than when fed Bacillus sp. (86). Vibrio cholerae is a common saltwater bacterium that often serves as a food source for planktonic bacterivorous ciliates, and so Cyclidium glaucoma, a ciliate isolated from a wastewater treatment plant, is reviewed to consume bacterial assemblages such as V. cholerae, Shigella sp., and Salmonella typhi (90). Similarly, numerous bacterivorous ciliates that feed on pathogenic bacterial species have been studied extensively. Two heterotrophic protists, for example, Thraustochytrids and labyrinthulids, associated with corals are hypothesized for their bacterial predation, production of polyunsaturated fatty acids, and provision of carbon that helps in host coral recovery (91). Thus, the ciliate’s ecological role can be adapted to the coral ecosystem. That is, the invaded ciliates can hunt infectious organisms (bacterial pathogens) that cause coral disease (Videos S3 to S5). As a result, the microbial pathogenic effect that contributes to the progression of coral disease lesions would be reduced, benefiting coral health and the coral reef ecosystem (Fig. 2 and 3; Table 2).

Potential roles of ciliates in ecosystem health and the possibilities that can be used in coral reef assessments

Although many studies had posed ciliates as pathogenic survivors, they have also demonstrated beneficial functions in numerous aspects such as in waste treatment, bacterivorous of pathogenic bacteria, and symbiosis between the ciliate and ingested microbes (62, 9294), which may be beneficial to coral health as well. Recent research has revealed a synergy of coral-associated microbial communities that play a vital part in the health of the coral colony (51), in which ciliate symbiosis is frequently mutualistic, parasitic, and commensal (Table 1) (92). Symbiosis in the form of mutual interaction benefits both the organism’s fitness and their ability to exist in new ecological niches (92). It assists both parties in the delivery of energy and nutrition, as well as protection from environmental stressors like pollutants or free radicals, and predator defense (95). Ciliates function as hosts for symbionts such as eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea (92). This ciliate symbiotic action benefits symbionts by providing nutrition, CO2, protection from grazing, inorganic and organic material disposal, and genetic exchange (92). Where genetic alterations are accelerated through genome evolution as a result of the close physical proximity of both symbiotic partners (96). Similarly, in cases of phosphate limitation in a freshwater system, some ciliate algal symbiosis can store phosphate under favorable conditions (92). A few associations also aid in sulfur oxidation and sequester algal plastids by keeping their chloroplast intact, which the host maintains and employs in photosynthesis (92, 97) (Table 2). As a result, these ciliates and their symbiotic relationship with matter cycling are involved in nitrogen fixation, sulfur transformation, high photosynthesis, phosphate storage (92), and UV protection due to the release of MAA (98) (Fig. 2), which may aid corals in recovering from diseased or stressed conditions (Table 2). For example, the functional ecology of the coral-associated ciliate Chromera velia revealed their potential to infect and develop an endosymbiotic interaction with coral larvae (99). They also function similarly to Symbiodinium sp. as coral photosymbionts (100). Thompson et al. (91) also hypothesized that ciliates benefit corals through the production of carbon sources, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and predation of bacteria. Hence, these poorly studied ciliate interactions with corals are likely to play an important role in coral health with the influence of changes in nutrient availability and associated microorganisms (12).

Research gaps and future perspectives

Corals connect with a variety of complex microbial communities, the most well studied of which are Symbiodiniaceae and bacteria for their symbiotic relationship. Other microorganisms, such as protistan ciliates, fungi, and bacteriophages, are little understood in terms of their symbiotic benefits to the host. Ciliates are an important component of aquatic ecosystems because of their role as predators of bacteria, algae, and providing nutrients for organisms at higher trophic levels. Thus, coral-associated microeukaryotic ciliates must be useful to the host in a variety of ways, such as nutrient suppliers, pathogenic bacterial and algal removers, which must be explored to understand their potential beneficial influence on coral health. Besides, various coral-associated heterotrophic and mixotrophic ciliates must now be isolated, identified, cultivated, and maintained in the laboratory and used as a model to investigate ciliate life cycle stages and diverse forms of nutrition. In laboratory aquaculture conditions, such analysis of feeding patterns and the nature of interaction with the coral holobiont may show their nutrition exchange, material disposal (organic and inorganic), UV protection capability, and genetic exchange. Furthermore, the presence of plastids and other unique photosynthetic pigments in ciliates can be used to study their interaction and distinguish between photosynthetic and heterotrophic forms to find mixotrophic ciliates connected with corals. Besides, characterization of the photosynthetic pigments of ciliates and endosymbiotic algae can provide insights into the exchange of ciliate photosynthetic derivatives with host corals. Ciliates in elemental cycling may also be studied to evaluate their impact on nitrogen and phosphorus cycling, as well as other symbiotic benefits that may lead to coral reef resilience. Furthermore, multiple investigations have shown ciliates grazing on bacteria, suggesting that coral-associated ciliates can prevent bacterial infection. Therefore, focusing on identifying and characterizing more non-pathogenic protozoan symbionts that actively graze bacteria for growth and proliferation can be used as biological control agents. Performing co-infection experiments of compatible protozoan and coral bacterial pathogens also gives the protozoan with the potential to graze on the bacteria that infect the corals. This will allow us to gain the knowledge we need about ciliate specificity, as well as broaden the application of such an approach in pathogen-infected corals. As a result, the next step would be to identify, isolate, and culture more potential protozoan ciliates, screen infecting ciliates with various diseased, immunocompromised, and bleached corals, and characterize the mechanisms involved in bacterial inhibition, nutrition exchange, and other beneficial activities that support coral health using more realistic microcosm environments. Finally, DNA-based molecular approaches such as polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing of internal transcriber spacer, 5.8S and 28S rRNA (ribosomal RNA) regions of ciliates may provide identity (32), and studying the metagenome and transcriptome of coral holobiont may reveal the extent of ciliate diversity and functions (101).

Conclusion

Various protozoan ciliate species have been described for their relationships with corals all around the world. However, the nature of their relationship and the potential ecological importance of ciliate-coral interaction is not well understood. The current study highlights some of the essential topics that need to be addressed regarding the significance of ciliates and their host coral connections, as well as the involvement of ciliate communities in nutrient cycling and the colonization of immunocompromised and bleached coral tissue. Furthermore, ciliate cultures could be utilized to better understand the feed specificity of ciliates linked with corals, which could aid in better understanding the host specificity, if any, in the biochemical interactions that enhance coral health.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank the Director, CSIR-National Institute of Oceanography for the encouragement and support. C.R. thanks, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), Govt. of India, New Delhi and Forest Department, Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (PCCF) and Chief wildlife Warden, Chennai 15, Tamil Nadu and Wildlife Warden, Gulf of Mannar Marine National park, Tamil Nadu, India, for the entry and as well as for collecting the coral samples.

This study was supported by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT) (Grant No. BT/PR15162/AAQ/3/752/2015), India to Dr. C.R. This is NIO contribution no. 7105

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest or competing interests.

Contributor Information

Chinnarajan Ravindran, Email: cravindran@nio.org.

Jennifer B. Glass, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01217-23.

Supplemental movie legend. aem.01217-23-s0001.docx.

Supplemental movie legend

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF1
Cohnilembus verminus. aem.01217-23-s0002.mp4.

Cohnilembus verminus- adult C. verminus isolated from Porites sp. C. verminus feeding on dead and decaying coral tissues of Porites sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF2
Holosticha sp. aem.01217-23-s0003.mp4.

Holosticha sp. - Adult Holosticha sp. isolated from both Acropora sp. and Porites sp. feeding on the Zooxanthellae of Acropora sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF3
Cohnilembus verminus. aem.01217-23-s0004.mp4.

Cohnilembus verminus- adult C. verminus isolated from Porites sp. C. verminus feeding on bacteria of coral tissues of Porites sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF4
Euplotes sp. aem.01217-23-s0005.mp4.

Euplotes sp.- isolated from both Acropora sp. and Porites sp. feeding on bacteria of coral tissues of Acropora sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF5
Uronema marinum. aem.01217-23-s0006.mp4.

Uronema marinum - Adult Uronema marinum isolated from both Acropora sp. and Porites sp. feeding on the dead and decaying tissues of both Porites sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF6

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Vanwonterghem I, Webster NS. 2020. Coral reef microorganisms in a changing climate. iScience 23:100972. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.100972 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Siboni N, Ben-Dov E, Sivan A, Kushmaro A. 2008. Global distribution and diversity of coral-associated archaea and their possible role in the coral holobiont nitrogen cycle. Environ Microbiol 10:2979–2990. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01718.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Bourne DG, Garren M, Work TM, Rosenberg E, Smith GW, Harvell CD. 2009. Microbial disease and the coral holobiont. Trends Microbiol 17:554–562. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2009.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Raina JB, Tapiolas D, Motti CA, Foret S, Seemann T, Tebben J, Willis BL, Bourne DG. 2016. Isolation of an antimicrobial compound produced by bacteria associated with reef-building corals. PeerJ 4:e2275. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wegley L, Edwards R, Rodriguez-Brito B, Liu H, Rohwer F. 2007. Metagenomic analysis of microbial community associated with the coral Porites astreoides. Environ Microbiol 9:2707–2719. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01383.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Amend AS, Barshis DJ, Oliver TA. 2012. Coral-associated marine fungi form novel lineages and heterogeneous assemblages. ISME J 6:1291–1301. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Krediet CJ, Ritchie KB, Paul VJ, Teplitski M. 2013. Coral-associated micro-organisms and their roles in promoting coral health and thwarting diseases. Proc Biol Sci 280:20122328. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ferrier-Pagès C, Godinot C, D’Angelo C, Wiedenmann J, Grover R. 2016. Phosphorus metabolism of reef organisms with algal symbionts. Ecol Monogr 86:262–277. doi: 10.1002/ecm.1217 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Margulis L. 1991. Symbiogenesis and symbionticism, p 1–14. In Margulis L, R Fester (ed), Symbiosis as a source of evolutionary innovation: speciation and morphogenesis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Webster NS, Reusch TBH. 2017. Microbial contributions to the persistence of coral reefs. ISME J 11:2167–2174. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.66 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sweet MJ, Séré MG. 2016. Ciliate communities consistently associated with coral diseases. J Sea Res 113:119–131. doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2015.06.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ainsworth TD, Fordyce AJ, Camp EF. 2017. The other microeukaryotes of the coral reef microbiome. Trends Microbiol 25:980–991. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Lynn D. 2008. The ciliated protozoa. characterization, classification, and guide to the literature. Springer Science + Business Media B .V, Toronto, ON. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lobban C, Schefter M, Simpson A, Pochon X, Foissner W. 2002. Maristentor Dinoferus N. Gen., N. SP., a giant Heterotrich Ciliate (Spirotrichea: Heterotrichida) with Zooxanthellae, from coral reefs on Guam, Mariana Islands. Mar Biol 140:411–423. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lobban CS, Modeo L, Verni F, Rosati G. 2005. Euplotes uncinatus (ciliophora, hypotrichia), a new species with zooxanthellae. Mar Biol 147:1055–1061. doi: 10.1007/s00227-005-0024-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ravindran C, Bhagwat PV, Silveira KA, Shivaramu MS, Lele UP. 2020. Characterization of coral associated ciliates and their interactions with disease lesion progression of Indian scleractinian corals. Microb Pathog 149:104472. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104472 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Johansson ME, Gorokhova LU. 2004. Annual variability in Ciliate community structure, potential prey and predators in the open northern Baltic sea proper. J Plankton Res 26:67–80. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbg115 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Ainsworth TD, Hoegh-Guldberg O. 2009. Bacterial communities closely associated with coral tissues vary under experimental and natural Reef conditions and thermal stress. Aquat Biol 4:289–296. doi: 10.3354/ab00102 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pinheiro MDO, Bols NC. 2013. Use of cell cultures to study the interactions of ciliates with fish. Springer Sci Rev 1:95–113. doi: 10.1007/s40362-013-0008-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Séré MG, Tortosa P, Chabanet P, Quod J-P, Sweet MJ, Schleyer MH. 2015. Identification of a bacterial pathogen associated with Porites white patch syndrome in the Western Indian ocean. Mol Ecol 24:4570–4581. doi: 10.1111/mec.13326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lobban CS, Raymundo LM, Montagnes DJS. 2011. Porpostoma guamensis n. sp., a philasterine scuticociliate associated with brown-band disease of corals. J Eukaryot Microbiol 58:103–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2010.00526.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Page CA, Willis BL. 2008. Epidemiology of skeletal eroding band on the great barrier reef and the role of injury in the initiation of this widespread coral disease. Coral Reefs 27:257–272. doi: 10.1007/s00338-007-0317-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Rodríguez S, Cróquer A, Guzmán HM, Bastidas C. 2009. A mechanism of transmission and factors affecting coral susceptibility to Halofolliculina sp. infection. Coral Reefs 28:67–77. doi: 10.1007/s00338-008-0419-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nugues MM, Bak RPM. 2009. Brown-band syndrome on feeding scars of the crown-of-thorn starfish Acanthaster Planci . Coral Reefs 28:507–510. doi: 10.1007/s00338-009-0468-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Cooper W, Lirman D, Schmale M, Lipscomb D. 2007. Consumption of coral spat by histophagic ciliates. Coral Reefs 26:249–250. doi: 10.1007/s00338-007-0196-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Sweet M, Bythell J. 2012. Ciliate and bacterial communities associated with white syndrome and brown band disease in reef‐building corals. Environ Microbiol 14:2184–2199. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2012.02746.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nicolet KJ, Hoogenboom MO, Gardiner NM, Pratchett MS, Willis BL. 2013. The corallivorous invertebrate Drupella aids in transmission of brown band disease on the great barrier reef. Coral Reefs 32:585–595. doi: 10.1007/s00338-013-1010-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Randall CJ, Jordán-Garza AG, van Woesik R. 2015. Ciliates associated with signs of disease on two caribbean corals. Coral Reefs 34:243–247. doi: 10.1007/s00338-014-1212-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Sweet M, Jones R, Bythell J. 2012. Coral diseases in aquaria and in nature. J Mar Biol Ass 92:791–801. doi: 10.1017/S0025315411001688 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ulstrup KE, Kühl M, Bourne DG. 2007. Zooxanthellae harvested by ciliates associated with brown band syndrome of corals remain photosynthetically competent. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1968–1975. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02292-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Qiu D, Huang L, Huang H, Yang J, Lin S. 2010. Two functionally distinct ciliates dwelling in Acropora corals in the South China sea near Sanya, Hainan province, China. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5639–5643. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03009-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ravindran C, Raveendran HP, Irudayarajan L. 2022. Ciliated protozoan occurrence and association in the pathogenesis of coral disease. Microb Pathog 162:105211. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Azovsky AI, Mazei YA. 2018. Diversity and distribution of free-living ciliates from high-Artic Kara sea sediments. Protist 169:141–157. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2018.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Xu Y, Soininen J. 2019. Spatial patterns of functional diversity and composition in marine benthic ciliates along the coast of China. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 627:49–60. doi: 10.3354/meps13086 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Vargas R, Hattori T. 1990. The distribution of protozoa among soil aggregates. FEMS Microbiol Lett 74:73–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04053.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Geltser YG. 1992. Free living protozoa as a component of soil biota. Eurasian Soil Sci 24:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wieltschnig C, Fischer UR, Kirschner AKT, Velimirov B. 2003. Benthic bacterial production and protozoan predation in a silty freshwater environment. Microb Ecol 46:62–72. doi: 10.1007/s00248-002-2040-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Porter KG, Pace ML, Battey JF. 1979. Ciliate protozoans as links in freshwater planktonic food chains. Nature 277:563–565. doi: 10.1038/277563a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Vargas CA, Martínez RA, Cuevas LA, Pavez MA, Cartes C, GonzÁlez HE, Escribano R, Daneri G. 2007. The relative importance of microbial and classical food webs in a highly productive coastal upwelling area. Limnol Oceanogr 52:1495–1510. doi: 10.4319/lo.2007.52.4.1495 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Fenchel T. 1968. ON “red water” in the Isefjord (inner danish waters) caused by the ciliate Mesodjnium rubrum. Ophelia 5:245–253. doi: 10.1080/00785326.6812.10407613 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Fenchel T. 1980. Suspension feeding in ciliated protozoa: feeding rates and their ecological significance. Microb Ecol 6:13–25. doi: 10.1007/BF02020371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Pan B, Chen X, Hou L, Zhang Q, Qu Z, Warren A, Miao M. 2019. Comparative genomics analysis of ciliates provides insights on the evolutionary history within "nassophorea-synhymenia-phyllopharyngea" assemblage. Front Microbiol 10:2819. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Stout JD. 1980. The role of protozoa in nutrient Cycling and energy flow, p 1–50. Advances in Microb Ecol Springer, Boston, MA. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-8291-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Gupta V, Germida JJ. 1989. Microbial biomass and extractable sulfate sulfur levels in native and cultivated soils as influenced by air-drying and rewetting. Can J Soil Sci 69:889–894. doi: 10.4141/cjss89-091 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Clarholm M. 1985. Interactions of bacteria, protozoa and plants leading to mineralization of soil nitrogen. Soil Biol Biochem 17:181–187. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90113-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Griffiths BS. 1986. Mineralization of nitrogen and phosphorus by mixed cultures of the ciliate protozoan Colpoda steinii. The nematode rhabdifis sp. and the bacterium Pseudomonas jluorescens. Soil Biol Biochem 18:637–641. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(86)90087-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. van Niel CB, Thomas JO, Ruben S, Kamen MD. 1942. Radioactive carbon as an indicator of carbon dioxide utilization. IX. The assimilation of carbon dioxide by protozoa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 28:157–161. doi: 10.1073/pnas.28.5.157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Peak JG, Peak MJ. 1977. Regulation by ammonium of variation in heterotrophic CO. fixation by Euglena gracilis during growth cycles. J Protozool 24:441–444. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1977.tb04772.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Christaki U, Belviso S, Dolan J, Corn M. 1996. Assessment of the role of copepods and ciliates in the release to solution of particulate DMSP. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 141:119–127. doi: 10.3354/meps141119 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Peixoto RS, Rosado PM, Leite DC, Rosado AS, Bourne DG. 2017. Beneficial microorganisms for corals (BMC): proposed mechanisms for coral health and resilience. Front Microbiol 8:341. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Kramarsky-Winter E, Harel M, Siboni N, Ben Dov E, Brickner I, Loya Y, Kushmaro A. 2006. Identification of a protist-coral association and its possible ecological role. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 317:67–73. doi: 10.3354/meps317067 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Cróquer A, Bastidas C, Lipscomb D. 2006. Folliculinid ciliates: a new threat to caribbean corals? Dis Aquat Organ 69:75–78. doi: 10.3354/dao069075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Bourne DG, Boyett HV, Henderson ME, Muirhead A, Willis BL. 2008. Identification of a ciliate (oligohymenophorea: scuticociliatia) associated with brown band disease on corals of the great barrier reef. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:883–888. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01124-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Katz SM, Pollock FJ, Bourne DG, Willis BL. 2014. Crown-of-thorns starfish predation and physical injuries promote brown band disease on corals. Coral Reefs 33:705–716. doi: 10.1007/s00338-014-1153-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Sweet M, Craggs J, Robson J, Bythell J. 2013. Assessment of the microbial communities associated with white syndrome and brown jelly syndrome in aquarium corals. J Zoo Aquar Res 1:20–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Page C, Willis B. 2006. Distribution, host range and large-scale spatial variability in black band disease prevalence on the great barrier reef, Australia. Dis Aquat Org 69:41–51. doi: 10.3354/dao069041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Willis BL, Page CA, Dinsdale EA. 2004. Coral disease on the great barrier reef, p 69–104. In Coral health and disease. Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-06414-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Sweet MJ, Croquer A, Bythell JC. 2014. Experimental antibiotic treatment identifies potential pathogens of white band disease in the endangered caribbean coral Acropora cervicornis. Proc Biol Sci 281:20140094. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Cróquer A, Bastidas C, Lipscomp D, Rodríguez-Martínez RE, Jordan-Dahlgren E, Guzman HM. 2006. First report of folliculinid ciliates affecting caribbean scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 25:187–191. doi: 10.1007/s00338-005-0068-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Rohwer F, Seguritan V, Azam F, Knowlton N. 2002. Diversity and distribution of coral-associated bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243:1–10. doi: 10.3354/meps243001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Nicolau A, Dias N, Mota M, Lima N. 2001. Trends in the use of protozoa in the assessment of wastewater treatment. Res Microbiol 152:621–630. doi: 10.1016/s0923-2508(01)01241-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Madoni P. 2011. Protozoa in wastewater treatment processes: a Minireview. Ital J Zool 78:3–11. doi: 10.1080/11250000903373797 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. van Oppen MJ, Palstra FP, Piquet AM, Miller DJ. 2001. Patterns of coral–dinoflagellate associations in Acropora: significance of local availability and physiology of Symbiodinium strains and host–symbiont selectivity. Proc Biol Sci 268:1759–1767. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1733 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Antonius AA, Lipscomb D. 2000. First protozoan coral-killer identified in the indo-pacific. Atoll Res Bull 481:1–21. doi: 10.5479/si.00775630.481 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Winkler R, Antonius A, Abigail Renegar D. 2004. The skeleton eroding band disease on coral reefs of Aqaba, Red Sea. Mar Ecol 25:129–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2004.00020.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Rutzler KD, Santavy L, Antonius A. 1983. The black band disease of Atlantic reef corals, III: distribution, ecology, and development. Mar Ecol 4:329–358. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.1983.tb00118.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Johnson MD. 2011. Acquired Phototrophy in ciliates: a review of cellular interactions and structural adaptations. J Eukaryot Microbiol 58:185–195. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00545.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Germond A, Nakajima T. 2016. Symbiotic associations in ciliates: ecological and evolutionary perspectives, p 253–275. In Biocomunication of ciliates. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32211-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Esteban GF, Fenchel T, Finlay BJ. 2010. Mixotrophy in ciliates. Protist 161:621–641. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2010.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Stoecker DK, Silver MW, Michaels AE, Davis LH. 1988. Obligate mixotrophy in Laboea strobila, a ciliate which retains chloroplasts. Mar Biol 99:415–423. doi: 10.1007/BF02112135 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Stoecker DK, Silver MW, Michaels AE, Davis LH. 1988. Enslavement of algal chloroplasts by four Strombidium spp. (ciliophora, oligo trichida). Mar Microb Food Webs 3:79–100. [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Rosenberg E, Kushmaro A. 2011. Microbial diseases of corals: pathology and ecology, p 451–464. In Coral reefs: an ecosystem in transition. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-0114-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Seuthe L, Rokkan Iversen K, Narcy F. 2011. Microbial processes in a high-latitude fjord (kongsfjorden, svalbard): II. Ciliates and dinoflagellates. Polar Biol 34:751–766. doi: 10.1007/s00300-010-0930-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. McManus GB, Schoener DM, Haberlandt K. 2012. Chloroplast symbiosis in a marine ciliate: ecophysiology and the risks and rewards of hosting foreign organelles. Front Microbiol 3:321. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Kim M, Kang M, Park MG. 2019. Growth and chloroplast replacement of the benthic mixotrophic ciliate Mesodinium coatsi. J Eukaryot Microbiol 66:625–636. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Nishitani G, Yamaguchi M. 2018. Seasonal succession of ciliate Mesodinium spp. with red, green, or mixed plastids and their association with cryptophyte prey. Sci Rep 8:17189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35629-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Dolan JR, PÉrez MT. 2000. Costs, benefits and characteristics of mixotrophy in marine oligotrichs. Freshw Biol 45:227–238. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2000.00659.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Motta MD, Pons MN, Vivier H, Amaral AL, Ferreira EC, Roche N, Mota M. 2001. The study of protozoa population in wastewater treatment plants by image analysis. Braz J Chem Eng 18:103–111. doi: 10.1590/S0104-66322001000100009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Curds CR, Cockburn A, Vandike JM. 1968. An experimental study of the role of the ciliated protozoa in the activated-sludge process. Water Pollution Control 67:312–329. [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Curds CR. 1973. The role of protozoa in the activated-sludge process. Am Zool 13:161–169. doi: 10.1093/icb/13.1.161 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Xu K, Choi JK, Lei Y, Yang EJ. 2011. Marine ciliate community in relation to eutrophication of coastal waters in the yellow sea. Chin J Ocean Limnol 29:118–127. doi: 10.1007/s00343-011-9106-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Gracia MP, Salvado H, Rius M, Amigo JM. 1994. Effects of copper on ciliate communities from activated sludge plants. Acta Protozool 33:219–226. [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Madoni P. 1994. A sludge biotic index (SBI) for the evaluation of the biological performance of activated sludge plant based on the microfauna analysis. Water Res 28:67–75. doi: 10.1016/0043-1354(94)90120-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Twagilimana L, Bohatier J, Groliere CA, Bonnemoy F, Sargos D. 1998. A new low-cost microbiotest with the protozoan Spirostomum teres: culture conditions and assessment of sensitivity of the ciliate to 14 pure chemicals. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 41:231–244. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1998.1698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Lin H-Y, Yeh W-Y, Tsai S-F, Chiang K-P, Lin J-Y, Tsao C-C, Lin H-J. 2020. Biological protective effects against vibrio infections in grouper larvae using the Strombidium sp. NTOU1, a marine ciliate amenable for scaled-up culture and with an excellent bacteriovorous ability. Front Mar Sci 7:373. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00373 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Berk SG, Colwell RR, Small EB. 1976. A study of feeding responses to bacterial prey by estuarine ciliates. Trans Amer Micr Soc 95:514. doi: 10.2307/3225146 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Becks L, Hilker FM, Malchow H, Jürgens K, Arndt H. 2005. Experimental demonstration of chaos in a microbial food web. Nature 435:1226–1229. doi: 10.1038/nature03627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Sherr EB, Sherr BF. 2002. Significance of predation by protists in aquatic microbial food webs. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:293–308. doi: 10.1023/a:1020591307260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Grønlien HK, Berg T, Løvlie AM. 2002. In the polymorphic ciliate Tetrahymena vorax, the non-selective phagocytosis seen in microstomes changes to a highly selective process in macrostomes. J Exp Biol 205:2089–2097. doi: 10.1242/jeb.205.14.2089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Macek M, Carlos G, Memije P, Ramírez P. 1997. Ciliate- Vibrio cholerae interactions within a microbial loop: an experimental study. Aquat Microb Ecol 13:257–266. doi: 10.3354/ame013257 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Thompson JR, Rivera HE, Closek CJ, Medina M. 2014. Microbes in the coral holobiont: partners through evolution, development, and ecological interactions. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:176. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00176 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Dziallas C, Allgaier M, Monaghan MT, Grossart HP. 2012. Act together—implications of symbiosis in aquatic ciliates. Front Microbiol 3:288. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Arregui L, Serrano S, Linares M, Pérez-Uz B, Guinea A. 2007. Ciliate contributions to bioaggregation: laboratory assays with axenic cultures of Tetrahymena thermophila. Int Microbiol 10:91–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Ali TH, Saleh DS. 2014. A simplified experimental model for the clearance of some pathogenic bacteria using common bacterivorous ciliated spp. Appl Water Sci 4:63–71. doi: 10.1007/s13201-013-0130-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Boucher DH, James S, Keeler KH. 1982. The ecology of mutualism. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 13:315–347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.001531 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Shinzato N, Kamagata Y. 2010. The methanogenic and eubacterial endosymbionts of trimyema, in (Endo)Symbiotic Methanogenic archaea, p 35–53. In Hackstein J (ed), Microbiology monographs. Springer, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Nowack ECM, Melkonian M. 2010. Endosymbiotic associations within protists. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:699–712. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Sommaruga R, Whitehead K, Shick JM, Lobban CS. 2006. Mycosporine-like amino acids in the zooxanthella-ciliate symbiosis Maristentor dinoferus. Protist 157:185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2006.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Cumbo VR, Baird AH, Moore RB, Negri AP, Neilan BA, Salih A, van Oppen MJH, Wang Y, Marquis CP. 2013. Chromera velia is endosymbiotic in larvae of the reef corals Acropora digitifera and A. tenuis. Protist 164:237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2012.08.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Cumbo VR, Baird AH. 2013. Chromera velia: coral symbiont or parasite. Galaxea. J Coral Reef Stud 15:15–16. doi: 10.3755/galaxea.15.15 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Levy S, Elek A, Grau-Bové X, Menéndez-Bravo S, Iglesias M, Tanay A, Mass T, Sebé-Pedrós A. 2021. A stony coral cell atlas Illuminates the molecular and cellular basis of coral symbiosis, calcification, and immunity. Cell 184:2973–2987. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental movie legend. aem.01217-23-s0001.docx.

Supplemental movie legend

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF1
Cohnilembus verminus. aem.01217-23-s0002.mp4.

Cohnilembus verminus- adult C. verminus isolated from Porites sp. C. verminus feeding on dead and decaying coral tissues of Porites sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF2
Holosticha sp. aem.01217-23-s0003.mp4.

Holosticha sp. - Adult Holosticha sp. isolated from both Acropora sp. and Porites sp. feeding on the Zooxanthellae of Acropora sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF3
Cohnilembus verminus. aem.01217-23-s0004.mp4.

Cohnilembus verminus- adult C. verminus isolated from Porites sp. C. verminus feeding on bacteria of coral tissues of Porites sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF4
Euplotes sp. aem.01217-23-s0005.mp4.

Euplotes sp.- isolated from both Acropora sp. and Porites sp. feeding on bacteria of coral tissues of Acropora sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF5
Uronema marinum. aem.01217-23-s0006.mp4.

Uronema marinum - Adult Uronema marinum isolated from both Acropora sp. and Porites sp. feeding on the dead and decaying tissues of both Porites sp.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.01217-23.SuF6

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES