. 2023 Oct 6;89(10):e00165-23. doi: 10.1128/aem.00165-23

TABLE 10.

Differences CFU of flies reared on different preservatives (none, set 1, set 2) on specific combinations of dietary yeast and microbiota: ANOVA analysis stratified by yeast and microbiota

Bacteria^a	Yeast batch	Contrast (Preservatives)	Estimate	SE	df	t ratio	P value^b
Lb	C	Set 1 - Set 2	0.267	0.116	90	2.296	0.0614
Lb	C	Set 1 - None	0.951	0.116	90	8.189	<0.0001
Lb	C	Set 2 - None	1.218	0.116	90	10.486	<0.0001
Ap	C	Set 1 - Set 2	0.417	0.116	90	3.591	0.0015
Ap	C	Set 1 - None	0.539	0.116	90	4.645	<0.0001
Ap	C	Set 2 - None	0.956	0.116	90	8.236	<0.0001
Lb	D	Set 1 - Set 2	0.894	0.116	90	7.698	<0.0001
Lb	D	Set 1 - None	0.339	0.116	90	2.92	0.0122
Lb	D	Set 2 - None	1.233	0.116	90	10.618	<0.0001
Ap	D	Set 1 - Set 2	0.315	0.116	90	2.71	0.0217
Ap	D	Set 1 - None	0.534	0.116	90	4.595	<0.0001
Ap	D	Set 2 - None	0.848	0.116	90	7.305	<0.0001
Lb	E	Set 1 - Set 2	0.828	0.116	90	7.128	<0.0001
Lb	E	Set 1 - None	0.193	0.116	90	1.659	0.2265
Lb	E	Set 2 - None	1.02	0.116	90	8.787	<0.0001
Ap	E	Set 1 - Set 2	0.555	0.116	90	4.775	<0.0001
Ap	E	Set 1 - None	1.146	0.116	90	9.867	<0.0001
Ap	E	Set 2 - None	1.7	0.116	90	14.642	<0.0001

^{^a}

Lb, L. brevis; Ap, A. pomorum.

^{^b}

Turkey corrected.