Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 6;2014(2):CD002207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002207.pub4

Comparison 1. Flexible‐dose buprenorphine versus flexible‐dose methadone.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Retention in treatment 11 1391 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.73, 0.95]
1.1 Double‐blind flexible dose studies 5 788 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.83 [0.72, 0.95]
1.2 Open label flexible dose studies 6 603 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.63, 1.02]
2 Morphine‐positive urines 8 1027 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.11 [‐0.23, 0.02]
3 Self‐reported heroin use 4 501 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.11 [‐0.28, 0.07]
4 Cocaine‐positive urines 6 919 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.10 [‐0.05, 0.25]
5 Benzodiazepine‐positive urines 6 859 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.05 [‐0.12, 0.22]
6 Criminal activity 2 328 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐0.10 [‐0.31, 0.12]