Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 31;14:6856. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42639-y

Table 2.

Screening of reaction conditionsa

graphic file with name 41467_2023_42639_Tabc_HTML.gif
Entry Change from standard conditions Yield (%) of 3aab
1 None 71
2 PTH2 instead of PTH1 74 (70)
3 PTH3 instead of PTH1 37
4 PTH4 instead of PTH1 0
5c Without LiBF4 0
6c LiPF6 instead of LiBF4 trace
7c NaBF4 instead of LiBF4 0
8c MeCN instead of MeCN/DCM 45
9c DCM instead of MeCN/DCM 53
10c DMF instead of MeCN/DCM 0
11c THF instead of MeCN/DCM 39
12c 0 °C instead of 10 °C 31
13c 20 °C instead of 10 °C 69
14c 40 °C instead of 10 °C 65
graphic file with name 41467_2023_42639_Tabd_HTML.gif

a Each reaction was carried out with 1a-1 (0.05 mmol), 2a (0.15 mmol), PTH1 (0.05 mmol) and LiBF4 (0.05 mmol) in MeCN (0.3 mL) and DCM (0.2 mL) at 10 °C under blue LED irradiation for 18 hb 1.H NMR yields. The number in parentheses is the isolated yieldc .PTH2 (1.0 equiv.) was used.