Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 26;2014(3):CD008486. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008486.pub2

Bleijenberg 1994.

Methods Study design: randomised controlled trial
Total study duration: Mean follow‐up 14 months (SD 8.9; range 3 to 28 months) for EMG biofeedback and 9 months (SD 7.0; range 3 to 26 months) for comparison group
Participants 21 patients, all with pelvic floor dyssynergia and constipation
N = 11 electromyograph (EMG) biofeedback (8 female, 3 male) (mean age 35 years, range 20 to 50 years); duration of symptoms (mean 8 years, range 2 to 11years)
N = 10 balloon biofeedback (8 female, 2 male) ‐ 1 drop out (mean age 40 years (range 28 to 47 years)); duration of symptoms (mean 7.5 years, range 2 to 15 years)
No difference between groups at pre‐test
Interventions No laxatives allowed
Weekly outpatient sessions for 8 weeks
Intervention group:
Phase 1: EMG biofeedback using anal‐plug electrode and digital display
Phase 2: simulated defecation of oatmeal porridge
Phase 3: toilet instructions ‐ to strain a maximum of 5 times on the toilet after each meal and patient to decide whether 'straining' was correct or not
Comparison group:
Phase 1: Balloon biofeedback using balloon catheter inflated with 20 mL air inserted 8 cm into rectum, patient to pull balloon out over 10 seconds without straining
Phase 2 and 3 same as EMG biofeedback
Outcomes EMG quality score (based on depth and amplitude of EMG signal from 0 to 100: 0 = no relaxation during straining, 100 = maximal relaxation)
Patient symptom diary (recorded 4 times daily): frequency, difficult evacuation, incomplete evacuation, hard stools, abdominal pain
Constipation score (calculated from symptom diary)
VAS (0 to 200: 100 = unchanged) of subjective rating of change
SCL‐90 ‐ validated psychopathology symptom checklist
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Low attrition (one participant only)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Not registered on a clinical trials registry
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias