Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 2;27:422. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04688-z

Table 3.

Summary of the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)

Patient or population: Adult patients with expected trauma-induced coagulopathy

Settings: In-hospital care

Intervention: Patients treated with PCC

Comparison: Patients treated without PCC

Outcomes
No of participants (studies)
Odds ratio Anticipated absolute effects Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) Comments
Without PCC With PCC Difference

Mortality

(8 studies,

n = 1685)

0.94

[0.60, 1.45]

27.2% 22.4% −  4.8%

 ⊕  ⊝  ⊝  ⊝ 

Very lowa,b

May decrease in-hospital mortality

DVT

(6 studies,

n = 1497)

1.00

[0.64; 1.55]

5.3% 7.0%  + 1.3%

 ⊕  ⊝  ⊝  ⊝ 

Very Lowa,c,d

May increase DVT

aDowngraded because the overall risk of bias for observational studies was serious

bDowngraded because PCC administration was not associated with mortality reduction in the only RCT published

cDowngraded because of the large confidence intervals

dDowngraded because the only RCT did not reported a significant increase of the DVT (but an increase of a composite outcome regrouping the occurrence of at least one thromboembolic event)

DVT deep venous thrombosis, PCC prothrombin complex concentrate